I would.

And who gets to decide who is a radical?

What the hell does that have to do with this thread?

__________________
"What you want to do is appropriate women, you want to appropriate womanhood and turn it into basically a costume that could be worn!" - Matt Walsh to trans activist

That usually turns out to be an eye of the beholder deal....


Example: Like some republicans kicking Liz Cheney to the curb....

Or, like when the democrats kicked John Edwards to the curb after his affair became known....

It's a "if you don't vote for me you ain't black" kinda deal. Group identity depends on Democrat party loyalty.

__________________
If Democrats were confident their nominee actually received more than 80 million votes they wouldn't have more troops occupying Washington, DC than Lincoln had defending the city during the Civil War. Not Joe Biden, Kim Jung Biden.

That always turns out to be in the eyes of the beholder.

If the group wishes to rename itself The Black Democratic Caucus (or The Democratic Black Caucus), it would be perfectly within its ethical rights to deny membership to this Republican congressmen.

But that is not the way that it advertises itself...

__________________
"In his second inaugural address, [Franklin D.] Roosevelt sought 'unimagined power' to enforce the 'proper subordination' of private power to public power. He got it…"—George Will, July 8, 2007