Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > Political Forums > US Congress & The Legislative Branch
Register FAQDonate PW Store PW Trivia Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

US Congress & The Legislative Branch Discuss Napolitano says keeping America safe may require civil liberty, privacy trade-offs at the Political Forums; Originally Posted by MrLiberty The group of imbeciles sitting in Washington would love nothing more than to tear up the ...

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-20-2010, 01:38 PM
TacticalEvilDan's Avatar
Intern
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 17
Thanks: 4
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Napolitano says keeping America safe may require civil liberty, privacy trade-off

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrLiberty View Post
The group of imbeciles sitting in Washington would love nothing more than to tear up the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
The same goes for the last group of imbeciles, too.

The same will be true of the next group of imbeciles.

This is the continuation of a trend that has been getting steeper over the last 100 or so years.

It isn't particular to Obama.

Just saying.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TacticalEvilDan For This Useful Post:
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-20-2010, 03:16 PM
MrLiberty's Avatar
professional curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,411
Thanks: 9,011
Thanked 8,563 Times in 5,799 Posts
Default Re: Napolitano says keeping America safe may require civil liberty, privacy trade-off

Quote:
Originally Posted by TacticalEvilDan View Post
The same goes for the last group of imbeciles, too.

The same will be true of the next group of imbeciles.

This is the continuation of a trend that has been getting steeper over the last 100 or so years.

It isn't particular to Obama.

Just saying.
And I agree, both parties have been doing!
__________________
And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country.

John F. Kennedy January 20th 1960
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-20-2010, 03:19 PM
MrLiberty's Avatar
professional curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,411
Thanks: 9,011
Thanked 8,563 Times in 5,799 Posts
Default Re: Napolitano says keeping America safe may require civil liberty, privacy trade-off

Quote:
Originally Posted by dabateman View Post
There have been tons of threads about the Bush Administration and their push against civil liberties on this forum. And not one peep from you UNTIL its the Obama Administration... Why is that if you are so passionate?
I think you should check again and you will see that I have bashed Bush also in many threads. I'm an equal opportunity basher. The problem you're having is that Bush is no longer president and is therefore no longer relevant where as obama is.
__________________
And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country.

John F. Kennedy January 20th 1960
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-20-2010, 03:30 PM
dabateman's Avatar
Common Sense-Common Good
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 14,472
Thanks: 1,863
Thanked 7,640 Times in 4,430 Posts
Default Re: Napolitano says keeping America safe may require civil liberty, privacy trade-off

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrLiberty View Post
I think you should check again and you will see that I have bashed Bush also in many threads. I'm an equal opportunity basher. The problem you're having is that Bush is no longer president and is therefore no longer relevant where as obama is.
I don't have a problem with people bashing the President. I have a problem with people bashing him for something they gave Bush a pass on. I am not saying that you have not been critical of the former President, but on this issue your silence has been deafening.
__________________
How can actions that are wrong lead to a greater good? - Jean-Luc Picard (Star Trek)
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-20-2010, 03:56 PM
MrLiberty's Avatar
professional curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,411
Thanks: 9,011
Thanked 8,563 Times in 5,799 Posts
Default Re: Napolitano says keeping America safe may require civil liberty, privacy trade-off

Quote:
Originally Posted by dabateman View Post
I don't have a problem with people bashing the President. I have a problem with people bashing him for something they gave Bush a pass on. I am not saying that you have not been critical of the former President, but on this issue your silence has been deafening.
Bush is no longer president. The patriot act was passed under Bush with democratic support AND before Politicqal Wrinkles was even a gleam in redd's eye.

I also find it ironic that people who have blasted Bush at every turn because he was a danger to our civil liberties and freedoms now want to support someone who is even more of a danger than Bush.

You can't have it both ways.
__________________
And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country.

John F. Kennedy January 20th 1960
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-20-2010, 04:28 PM
TacticalEvilDan's Avatar
Intern
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 17
Thanks: 4
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Napolitano says keeping America safe may require civil liberty, privacy trade-off

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrLiberty View Post
Bush is no longer president. The patriot act was passed under Bush with democratic support AND before Politicqal Wrinkles was even a gleam in redd's eye.
There wasn't a single politician in Washington who had the willpower to stand up to the PATRIOT act in any meaningful way. Nobody wanted to be portrayed as being soft on terrorists or slow to defend the nation's interests.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrLiberty View Post
I also find it ironic that people who have blasted Bush at every turn because he was a danger to our civil liberties and freedoms now want to support someone who is even more of a danger than Bush.
They support him for the same reason you say he's a bigger threat to our civil liberties than Bush was -- because he's their guy.

Obama represents precisely the same threat to our civil liberties that Bush did -- he represents the steadily expanding power of the Presidency.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TacticalEvilDan For This Useful Post:
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-20-2010, 04:34 PM
MrLiberty's Avatar
professional curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,411
Thanks: 9,011
Thanked 8,563 Times in 5,799 Posts
Default Re: Napolitano says keeping America safe may require civil liberty, privacy trade-off

Quote:
Originally Posted by TacticalEvilDan View Post
There wasn't a single politician in Washington who had the willpower to stand up to the PATRIOT act in any meaningful way. Nobody wanted to be portrayed as being soft on terrorists or slow to defend the nation's interests.



They support him for the same reason you say he's a bigger threat to our civil liberties than Bush was -- because he's their guy.

Obama represents precisely the same threat to our civil liberties that Bush did -- he represents the steadily expanding power of the Presidency.
I'll agree to that!
__________________
And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country.

John F. Kennedy January 20th 1960
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2010, 10:03 AM
dabateman's Avatar
Common Sense-Common Good
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 14,472
Thanks: 1,863
Thanked 7,640 Times in 4,430 Posts
Default Re: Napolitano says keeping America safe may require civil liberty, privacy trade-off

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrLiberty View Post
Bush is no longer president. The patriot act was passed under Bush with democratic support AND before Politicqal Wrinkles was even a gleam in redd's eye.

I also find it ironic that people who have blasted Bush at every turn because he was a danger to our civil liberties and freedoms now want to support someone who is even more of a danger than Bush.

You can't have it both ways.
I don't have a problem with a trade off as I know such a trade off must exist. HOWEVER, I should be aware of what areas I might be trading and for what level of security. We never got that out of the Bush Administration.

I'm not asking for both ways, I'm asking you not to play it both ways. You've had PLENTY of opportunity to criticize the previous Administration (while they were in office) about their civil liberty violations on this website. There have been threads upon threads.

Nothing but silence from you so this appears to be nothing more than politically expediant.
__________________
How can actions that are wrong lead to a greater good? - Jean-Luc Picard (Star Trek)
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2010, 11:06 AM
MrLiberty's Avatar
professional curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,411
Thanks: 9,011
Thanked 8,563 Times in 5,799 Posts
Default Re: Napolitano says keeping America safe may require civil liberty, privacy trade-off

Quote:
Originally Posted by dabateman View Post
I don't have a problem with a trade off as I know such a trade off must exist. HOWEVER, I should be aware of what areas I might be trading and for what level of security. We never got that out of the Bush Administration.

I'm not asking for both ways, I'm asking you not to play it both ways. You've had PLENTY of opportunity to criticize the previous Administration (while they were in office) about their civil liberty violations on this website. There have been threads upon threads.

Nothing but silence from you so this appears to be nothing more than politically expediant.
While Bush was in office I was not on Political Wrinkles so you don't know what I said about Bush when he was in office! I've only been here since March of 2009 and I believe that obama was in office already!
__________________
And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country.

John F. Kennedy January 20th 1960
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2010, 01:02 PM
GottaGo's Avatar
Sanity is overrated.
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Today Amuses
Posts: 8,081
Thanks: 5,879
Thanked 4,848 Times in 3,193 Posts
Default Re: Napolitano says keeping America safe may require civil liberty, privacy trade-off

....and all the devil wants is a soul.....

nibbles and bites, nibbles and bites. We got nailed to the wall in the Patriot Act, and in the fear of the moment, allowed too many of our rights and freedoms to be infringed upon.

It's not an "if" about using terrorism as a fear tactic, it's how far they think they can push it before someone yells ENOUGH!!
__________________
"Try and fathom the hypocrisy of a Government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured, but not everyone must prove they are a citizen".
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GottaGo For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
america, civil, keeping, liberty, may, napolitano, privacy, require, safe, says, tradeoffs

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0