![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Religion & Philosophy Discuss ADF attorneys defend Wis. high school student facing religious discrimination at the General Discussion; One of these pictures is not like the other... 2 of them are perfectly acceptable in the teacher's eyes, but ... |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
![]() ![]() ![]() One of these pictures is not like the other... 2 of them are perfectly acceptable in the teacher's eyes, but one of them gets you punished... Can you guess which one?... ![]() ADF attorneys defend Wis. high school student facing religious discrimination Quote:
[SARCASM]No attack on Christianity here...[/SARCASM]...: ![]()
__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd Last edited by cnredd; 04-01-2008 at 05:25 PM. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I find it absurd that the students cannot have a religious art rendition. It's the student who makes the art. It is not endorsed by the school. No violation of separation of church and state. The only possible sticky part is if the art involves a competition, on which case the judges should judge based on artistic merit. Not on whether or not they like the Dalmation drawn by one artist as opposed to the Russian Blue drawn by another. (Dog people can be notoriously prejudiced. (just kidding...)) But seriously, the school is being ridiculous. There is no rational reason for the prohibition. On another front, unrelated to my support of the student winning the case, the claim of "A public school cannot require students to sign away their constitutional right to free speech and religious expression..." is banal. Students often have their "free speech" and "religious expression" limited. But the interests in doing so are not present here. Also on another front, I wonder how the first two would do at a Christian school. Oh wait! Let me guess. THEN the "free speech and religious expression" would be curtailed, and it would be okay, right? ![]() |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to foundit66 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
||||
|
I agree that the policy is stupid and unconstitutional. But I think it could be convincingly argued that the first two pictures do not depict "religious beliefs." Who says those are demons? They are fantasy art, pure and simple. The fact that the teacher only asked the student to remove the Biblical reference indicates to me that he/she was trying to tred a fine line between the established rule and stifling freedom of expression. He/she could just as easily have insisted that the cross itself was a violation of the rule but didn't. I think they will do better to stick to the argument that the rule is unconstitutional.
__________________
Right now America spends $700 billion every year on foreign oil. That's our money going overseas when it could be staying here. We have to stop this. That's why I support the Pickens Plan. Check out the website at www.pickensplan.com. If you like what you see, please join me as a Pickens Plan supporter. If a certain course of action makes the mouth-breathers furious, then that’s a good policy. – The Practical Environmentalist |
| The Following User Says Thank You to crazyflamingos For This Useful Post: | ||
| The Following User Says Thank You to foundit66 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Idealogically Promiscuous For This Useful Post: | ||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Must be a transplant. This is getting worse, isn't it? Who do these people think they are telling an 'artist' he cannot create something out of his emotional connection with the subject. We've gone about as far as we can go in allowing non Christians and protesters of the war and their religions (including Christianity) the right to their own creativity. This is too much. This teacher should be horse whipped. Or at the very least fired. You do not stiffle a child's creativity like this. This is horrible from an artistic standpoint, a psychological standpoint, and a legal one!
__________________
________________________________________ Salty THANKSGIVING MENUS AND TIPS A GREAT PLACE TO SHOP |
| The Following User Says Thank You to saltwn For This Useful Post: | ||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The teacher was just following a school district rule. And, it seems to me, stretched a point in allowing the cross to remain and only requesting the removal of the Bible reference. Why, then, should he/she be punished?
__________________
Right now America spends $700 billion every year on foreign oil. That's our money going overseas when it could be staying here. We have to stop this. That's why I support the Pickens Plan. Check out the website at www.pickensplan.com. If you like what you see, please join me as a Pickens Plan supporter. If a certain course of action makes the mouth-breathers furious, then that’s a good policy. – The Practical Environmentalist |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Because...he/she is stupid? The child's creativity is undermined here. I don't believe the school has specific rules against religious art. If it does, then, of course, it should be sued. I cannot consider the words 'teacher' and 'monster' in the same contexet. But that is what we are talking about. A monster who purports to teach children. OR an ignoramus teaching kids. Either one is unacceptable. You have a child who is interested in the piano, for instance. He wants to learn to play a simple tune that is dear to him. Do you stiffle that urge by putting a fence around what he can play? Say the song is "Little Brown Jug." Or say the song is "Jesus Loves Me." Same dif.
__________________
________________________________________ Salty THANKSGIVING MENUS AND TIPS A GREAT PLACE TO SHOP |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Right now America spends $700 billion every year on foreign oil. That's our money going overseas when it could be staying here. We have to stop this. That's why I support the Pickens Plan. Check out the website at www.pickensplan.com. If you like what you see, please join me as a Pickens Plan supporter. If a certain course of action makes the mouth-breathers furious, then that’s a good policy. – The Practical Environmentalist |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Wearing a T-shirt or a ball cap that is red or blue is one thing. But why have a damned art class if you are going to dictate what a person can draw? Or play on a violin? Once the music of the Irish was forced underground as sinful. The "devil music" was three-part-harmony.
__________________
________________________________________ Salty THANKSGIVING MENUS AND TIPS A GREAT PLACE TO SHOP |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.politicalwrinkles.com/religion-philosophy/2676-adf-attorneys-defend-wis-high-school-student-facing-religious-discrimination.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Political Wrinkles | This thread | Refback | 04-01-2008 05:55 PM | |