Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
He was punished for killing people.
There is no "motive" tied to his sentence whereby he was sentenced for disliking the coffee.
You are seriously divorced from reality.
The difference is inflated in your (and right-winger) heads.
You guys didn't give one iota of concern when GW Bush or other right-wingers used terminology which was "worse". But Holder talks about how the terrorism has no legitimate religious claim and you guys lose your minds.
And Obama worked hard on making each and every single one of those campaign stickers.
Okay. You're too absurd.
I can't take your b.s. seriously.
When you can address the below, you let me know.
Until then, I'm bored with your derailment. The only common thread is you want to rant about Obama.
Who said these: "Well I think there was one important point that he was making about them not being Islamic or a form of true Islam. Ultimately civilized Islam will have to step up. We need to do everything we can to do protect ourselves and I'm all in for saying we have to combat ISIS but also the ultimate war, the long war, whoever knows how long, ultimately is going to need allies from civilized Islam. So I think it is important not only for the American public, but for the world, and for the Islamic world to point out that this is not a true form of Islam. This is an abhorrent form that should not represent most of the civilized Islamic world. " "I also want to speak tonight directly to Muslims throughout the world We respect your faith. It's practiced freely by many millions of Americans, and by millions more in countries that America counts as friends. Its teachings are good and peaceful, and those who commit evil in the name of Allah blaspheme the name of Allah. (Applause.) The terrorists are traitors to their own faith, trying, in effect, to hijack Islam itself. The enemy of America is not our many Muslim friends; it is not our many Arab friends Our enemy is a radical network of terrorists, and every government that supports them." |
Classifying Hasan as the perpetrator of work place violence is spin to shift the focus for future prevention away from the real problem of Islamic extremist terrorism. Despite your efforts at fixating on Hasan's punishment, it isn't the issue. The deliberate cover up of Islamic terrorism in the attack is.
The only way Obama is responsible for his campaign bumper sticker proclaiming his breakthrough accomplishment, killing Bin Laden, is if they were printed by his own hand. The rhetorical contortions by members of the cult of Obama to shield him from responsibility are comical.
Of course it doesn't matter that he bragged over and over again about killing Bin Laden or that the bumper stickers were produced and touted by his campaign, he is not responsible.
President Bush was very clear that we were fighting terrorism. He even had a strategy for the war, a foreign policy to support it and obtained Congressional approval for the use of military force. Yet this is somehow supposed to be indistinguishable from President Obama's muddled response to the same threat of Islamic terrorism.
After shunning the international show of support for combating Islamic terrorism in Paris, our President is going to host a dog and pony show on combating "violent extremism" . Who cares if Islamic terrorism is responsible for terrorist attacks world wide, the real problem is this nebulous group of violent extremists.
01-17-2015, 08:16 AM
Re: Eric Holder Asked Twice if the U.S. Is at War With Radical Islam. Just Guess How
Linear Mode
