Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > General Forum > Polls
Register FAQDonate PW Store PW Trivia Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Polls Discuss Should White Supremist violent speech be covered by the 1st amendment? at the General Forum; Originally Posted by pjohns And this is directly related to support for the congresswoman from Georgia...how, exactly? Liz Cheney retained ...

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2021, 05:49 PM
saltwn's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Esto perpetua
Posts: 88,398
Thanks: 57,142
Thanked 26,881 Times in 19,329 Posts
Send a message via AIM to saltwn Send a message via MSN to saltwn Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: Should White Supremist violent speech be covered by the 1st amendment?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pjohns View Post
And this is directly related to support for the congresswoman from Georgia...how, exactly?

Liz Cheney retained her position--easily--as it was just a minority in the GOP who opposed her. (To fail to note this is...well, at best, it is intellectually dishonest...)



Well, that is a good talking point.

Except for the fact that you cannot prove it.



Every time you cannot actually refute a point, you just drag in Fox News and "talk radio" (as if CNN and MSNBC were, somehow, more neutral in their coverage).
you never answered the question. what is romney's voting record?

Cheney's wyoming state legislators censured her. That perhaps speaks more to the craziness of the party than anything. yes if it had been public she would probably have inched past or been removed from committees, with some twisted mitch logc thrown in to appease orange boy.

How is not going through metal detectors related to how cray-cray Republicans are?
who put these arse ole's IN and are keeping them in?
__________________
The IRS budget has been reduced by roughly 20%. Meanwhile, the richest 1% have been able to evade as much as $163 billion a year in taxes. These things are directly connected.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2021, 08:02 AM
Conservative Sage
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 20,401
Thanks: 14,190
Thanked 15,492 Times in 8,863 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to AZRWinger
Default Re: Should White Supremist violent speech be covered by the 1st amendment?

Quote:
Originally Posted by saltwn View Post
you never answered the question. what is romney's voting record?

Cheney's wyoming state legislators censured her. That perhaps speaks more to the craziness of the party than anything. yes if it had been public she would probably have inched past or been removed from committees, with some twisted mitch logc thrown in to appease orange boy.

How is not going through metal detectors related to how cray-cray Republicans are?
who put these arse ole's IN and are keeping them in?
Are you trying to say Romney's voting record contradicts his attacks on Trump? If so, that would make him a hypocrite.

Instead of representing her constituents Liz Cheney joined the impeachment lynch mob. It's a pity House Republicans didnít strip he of her leadership position.
__________________
If Democrats were confident their nominee actually received more than 80 million votes they wouldn't have more troops occupying Washington, DC than Lincoln had defending the city during the Civil War. Not Joe Biden, Kim Jung Biden.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2021, 11:13 AM
Dog Man's Avatar
Down Boy!
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Southern Nevada
Gender: Male
Posts: 15,781
Thanks: 10,566
Thanked 8,925 Times in 5,877 Posts
Default Re: Should White Supremist violent speech be covered by the 1st amendment?

Quote:
Originally Posted by saltwn View Post
Should speech such as asking for or agreeing with the killing of politicians be covered by the 1st amendment?.
Yes...but only if it is about killing Republican politicians.


Signed: Typical Democrat
__________________
Political Correctness, is Fascism masquerading as manners - George Carlin.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dog Man For This Useful Post:
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2021, 11:16 AM
GetAClue's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Ohio
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,040
Thanks: 13,410
Thanked 9,869 Times in 5,602 Posts
Default Re: Should White Supremist violent speech be covered by the 1st amendment?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AZRWinger View Post
Are you trying to say Romney's voting record contradicts his attacks on Trump? If so, that would make him a hypocrite.

Instead of representing her constituents Liz Cheney joined the impeachment lynch mob. It's a pity House Republicans didnít strip he of her leadership position.
My guess is that they will repay her in the next election by voting for someone that WILL represent the voters interest's instead of their own.
__________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine

A lie doesn't become truth, a wrong doesn't become right, and Evil doesn't become good, just because it is accepted by the majority. - Booker T Washington
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2021, 02:30 PM
cnredd's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Gender: Male
Posts: 57,273
Thanks: 2,451
Thanked 39,402 Times in 21,906 Posts
Default Re: Should White Supremist violent speech be covered by the 1st amendment?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GetAClue View Post
My guess is that they will repay her in the next election by voting for someone that WILL represent the voters interest's instead of their own.
Depends...

How many times have we seen a candidate you just KNOW will lose their own primary, only to have their opponent be completely incompetent?...
__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2021, 11:22 PM
Conservative Sage
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 20,401
Thanks: 14,190
Thanked 15,492 Times in 8,863 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to AZRWinger
Default Re: Should White Supremist violent speech be covered by the 1st amendment?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cnredd View Post
Depends...

How many times have we seen a candidate you just KNOW will lose their own primary, only to have their opponent be completely incompetent?...
Claire McCaskill comes to mind. Democrat Senator from Missouri was wildly unpopular with voters. She donated $1 million to the Republican primary candidate she thought she was most likely to beat.. She was able to win reelection after her chosen opponent made some crazy claims about spontaneous abortion by rape victims.
__________________
If Democrats were confident their nominee actually received more than 80 million votes they wouldn't have more troops occupying Washington, DC than Lincoln had defending the city during the Civil War. Not Joe Biden, Kim Jung Biden.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AZRWinger For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
1st, amendment, covered, should, speech, supremist, the, violent, white

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0