Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQDonate Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Politics Discuss Teabaggers punk'd by anti-racists who get them to cheer rant against European-America at the Political Forums; Originally Posted by jabbo I think Salty's right. Furthermore, all this innocence about justifying the continued use of the word ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 09:02 AM
foundit66's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,670
Thanks: 1,656
Thanked 2,839 Times in 1,868 Posts
Post Re: Teabaggers punk'd by anti-racists who get them to cheer rant against European-Ame

Quote:
Originally Posted by jabbo View Post
I think Salty's right.
Furthermore, all this innocence about justifying the continued use of the word teabagger out of ignorance is kinda like using the word gay in its original sense and refusing to pay attention to folks that try to explain it to ya - in other words, it's a bunch of crapola or stupidity - take your pick.
"Gay" was never chosen by homosexuals.
From the start of the use of the word, it was used derogatorily towards homosexuals.

Gays just retook the word and refused to be cowed by it.

"That's so gay" being applied to something that has no real homosexual connotations is simply a mindless attempt to slur gays by a negative association.
It's like saying "That's so white of you" or calling somebody an "Indian giver".
If somebody tried to start a trend of substituting "black" in place of "gay" in "That's so gay", people would undoubtedly recognize the prejudicial approach.
The POINT of the phrase is involving a negative connotation regarding the group in a situation that typically has NOTHING TO DO with the group.

So "That's so gay" is appropriately applied here...



"Tea Bag" is something that I have DOCUMENTED is a part of what the "Tea Party" people themselves were doing from the start.
By the loose standards that have been applied trying to criticize me in this thread, ANYBODY could take a term they don't like and assume the worst possible connotation (even when clearly not intended by the original poster).
And in some cases, people have just plain made up their own stupid nonsense as to what they want people to think it means...

I haven't applied the term to any NON-tea party situation. Nor was I intending to.

What's really happened in this thread is that some people (not referencing you), who have NO PROBLEM USING INVECTIVE when it comes to slurring "liberals" have turned around and insisted that they themselves be free from negative commentary...

But at this stage, people have side-tracked the point of the thread by what can only be interpreted as a Politically Correct demand that offended parties be free from being offended, regardless of whether any offense was truly meant or rationally applicable.

As long as the Tea Party groups (and the GOP) invoke the use of Tea Bags themselves, I see no real problem in the use of the word.
Likewise, as gays call themselves gay, go ahead and call a homosexual "gay".


Quote:
Originally Posted by jabbo
like using the word gay in its original sense
"The original sense" regarded
1 a : happily excited : merry <in a gay mood> b : keenly alive and exuberant : having or inducing high spirits <a bird's gay spring song>
2 a : bright, lively <gay sunny meadows> b : brilliant in color
3 : given to social pleasures



Like Wanda Sykes said, when people are using "That's so gay" to say something is dumb or stupid, then your own comment is violated.
Right?

"Dumb or Stupid" were never part of the meaning of the word "gay" ...
__________________
Republicans have a sweet racket because they run on "government is ineffective," and then when they **** things up, they go, "See." – Bill Maher

"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint.
When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a Communist."

--Dom Hélder Pessoa Câmara
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 10:04 AM
Michael1's Avatar
Godfather
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Greensboro, NC
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,976
Thanks: 935
Thanked 1,213 Times in 848 Posts
Default Re: Teabaggers punk'd by anti-racists who get them to cheer rant against European-Ame

I'm now about as clear about the use of the term 'tea-bagger' as I am about the terms 'gay', 'faggot', 'homo', 'queer', 'poof', 'twink', and especially 'fudge-packer'.

It sounds to me that the argument here is that a word cannot be a derogatory slur as long as it is an accurate description of a groups actions.

Therefore logically, I should probably use the term 'fudge-packer' to describe homosexual men than 'gay', because homosexual men aren't necessarily happy but are ... well, you know.
__________________
Dudes ... you're just NOT THAT MUCH ****ING SMARTER than all of us. GET OVER YOURSELVES!
-- Me, to President Obama and the rest of his self-loving amateur staff.

Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Michael1 For This Useful Post:
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 10:04 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tennessee
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,347
Thanks: 629
Thanked 355 Times in 245 Posts
Default Re: Teabaggers punk'd by anti-racists who get them to cheer rant against European-Ame

Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
And thus begins a long and pointless "attack the messenger" approach...
This particular "messenger" appears to have an almost limitless sense of schadenfreude.

One might be pardoned for wondering just how much credibility you would attach to an article carried by Newsmax or World Net Daily. Or even by The Weekly Standard or--that classiest of all conservative journals--National Review.

Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
And instead of an argument against the issue, you instead whine about your fantasies of my supposed imagination...
The modifier, "supposed," seems quite superfluous (and downright misleading) in the sentence, above.

Your intent does, after all, appear rather obvious.

An addendum: The Urban Dictionary defines the word "troll" (in the Internet sense of the term) as "[o]ne who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument[.]"

Last edited by pjohns; 11-21-2009 at 10:16 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 10:21 AM
foundit66's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,670
Thanks: 1,656
Thanked 2,839 Times in 1,868 Posts
Post Re: Teabaggers punk'd by anti-racists who get them to cheer rant against European-Ame

Quote:
Originally Posted by pjohns View Post
This particular "messenger" appears to have an almost limitless sense of schadenfreude.
Another swing and a miss...

But you keep plugging away slugger. Eventually somebody will lob one over your plate that you can hit...


Quote:
Originally Posted by pjohns
One might be pardoned for wondering just how much credibility you would attach to an article carried by Newsmax or World Net Daily. Or even by The Weekly Standard or--that classiest of all conservative journals--National Review.
One might wonder why you would "wonder" that in the first place.
"Credibility"?
There is video proof at the web-site.

You can believe your eyes if you want to doubt the web-site.
If you find anything on the video that is inaccurate, please let me know.
Otherwise, you're just trying to ignore the message by attacking the messenger...


Quote:
Originally Posted by pjohns
The modifier, "supposed," seems quite superfluous (and downright misleading) in the sentence, above.
No. It's 100% accurate.
Because it's what YOU SUPPOSE I am thinking.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pjohns
Your intent does, after all, appear rather obvious.
My intent was to point out the true nature of these "Tea Parties", as I have repeatedly described.

If I asked you for more evidence of the certainty of your presumption of "my intent", would I be met with a chorus of "I know what you're thinking" type commentary?

Feh. Why remain on the hypothetical...
Let's make it official.
Can you show me the evidence of why you are so certain that you think my "intent" is as you previously described ("delight at the discomfort he believes has been caused to the Tea Party participants")?
__________________
Republicans have a sweet racket because they run on "government is ineffective," and then when they **** things up, they go, "See." – Bill Maher

"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint.
When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a Communist."

--Dom Hélder Pessoa Câmara
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 10:24 AM
MrLiberty's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Michigan
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,942
Thanks: 2,214
Thanked 1,721 Times in 1,309 Posts
Default Re: Teabaggers punk'd by anti-racists who get them to cheer rant against European-Ame

troll also can mean someone who lives in the lower peninsula of Michigan.

for those of you not familiar with Michigan you must cross over the mighty Mackinac Bridge to get to the upper peninsula and the people up there call us trolls because we live below the bridge.

just a bit of trivia to add to this thread which I find to be so gay!
__________________
The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it always to be kept alive.
Thomas Jefferson

* An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia regatur orbis?
o Translation: "Don't you know, my son, with how little wisdom the world is governed?


VIVE LIBERTE'
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MrLiberty For This Useful Post:
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 10:28 AM
foundit66's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,670
Thanks: 1,656
Thanked 2,839 Times in 1,868 Posts
Post Re: Teabaggers punk'd by anti-racists who get them to cheer rant against European-Ame

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael1 View Post
I'm now about as clear about the use of the term 'tea-bagger' as I am about the terms 'gay', 'faggot', 'homo', 'queer', 'poof', 'twink', and especially 'fudge-packer'.
It sounds to me that the argument here is that a word cannot be a derogatory slur as long as it is an accurate description of a groups actions.
No.

I never said "cannot be derogatory".

I am saying what MY INTENT on using the word was...

I clearly explained that.

As for OTHER PEOPLE using the word "tea-bagger" in reference to other meanings, that's part of the great thing about the dictionary.
It has MULTIPLE MEANINGS included cause different people use it in different ways.


What you guys really need to stop and do is question how these comments aimed at me mimic the whole "Politically Correct" mindset.
After all, some people complain it is "Politically Correct" that people use an NFL term like "Redskins".
SOME Politically Correct people insist that the term "Redskins" shouldn't be used because the interpretation of the use could be negative, disregarding the intent of the actual use...


Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael1
Therefore logically, I should probably use the term 'fudge-packer' to describe homosexual men than 'gay', because homosexual men aren't necessarily happy but are ... well, you know.

Considering the majority of men who have anal sex are actually HETEROSEXUAL, I would hope such a use on your part wouldn't be exclusive towards gay men...
__________________
Republicans have a sweet racket because they run on "government is ineffective," and then when they **** things up, they go, "See." – Bill Maher

"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint.
When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a Communist."

--Dom Hélder Pessoa Câmara
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 12:02 PM
jabbo's Avatar
Village Idiot
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Margaritaville and/or the Scottish Highlands
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,247
Thanks: 426
Thanked 647 Times in 446 Posts
Default Re: Teabaggers punk'd by anti-racists who get them to cheer rant against European-Ame

Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post

....

"Tea Bag" is something that I have DOCUMENTED is a part of what the "Tea Party" people themselves were doing from the start.

....

I haven't applied the term to any NON-tea party situation. Nor was I intending to.

....

What's really happened in this thread is that some people (not referencing you), who have NO PROBLEM USING INVECTIVE when it comes to slurring "liberals" have turned around and insisted that they themselves be free from negative commentary...

But at this stage, people have side-tracked the point of the thread by what can only be interpreted as a Politically Correct demand that offended parties be free from being offended, regardless of whether any offense was truly meant or rationally applicable.

As long as the Tea Party groups (and the GOP) invoke the use of Tea Bags themselves, I see no real problem in the use of the word.
Likewise, as gays call themselves gay, go ahead and call a homosexual "gay".

....
So sending a tea bag to someone makes you a teabagger...like sending flowers to someone makes you a flowerer...or sending a present to someone makes you a presenter....

Maybe if instead of tea bags they originally sent loose tea....

C'mon, you're smarter than that....

I do see your general point though, and it is well taken.
__________________
_____________________________________________
Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -Friedrich Nietzsche, philosopher (1844-1900)
_____________________________________________

Just an old sweet song keeps Georgia on my mind
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 12:24 PM
Michael1's Avatar
Godfather
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Greensboro, NC
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,976
Thanks: 935
Thanked 1,213 Times in 848 Posts
Default Re: Teabaggers punk'd by anti-racists who get them to cheer rant against European-Ame

Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
No.

I never said "cannot be derogatory".

I am saying what MY INTENT on using the word was...

I clearly explained that.
So as long as I don't intend for a word to be derogatory, I can keep using it. OK. I fully understand now.

Quote:
Considering the majority of men who have anal sex are actually HETEROSEXUAL, I would hope such a use on your part wouldn't be exclusive towards gay men...
So you're suggesting that I'd be best off referring to a homosexual man as a queer fudgepacker, or say fudge-packing faggot and not just a fudgepacker. Gotcha!

This is silly but I know you'll deny getting my point. If you once are made aware that quite a few people consider a word or phrase derogatory, and you're a civil human being, you then usually refrain from future use.
__________________
Dudes ... you're just NOT THAT MUCH ****ING SMARTER than all of us. GET OVER YOURSELVES!
-- Me, to President Obama and the rest of his self-loving amateur staff.

Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 03:53 PM
saltwn's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: town in the Northwest- Home of the National Fiddle Finals!
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,815
Thanks: 8,694
Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,265 Posts
Default Re: Teabaggers punk'd by anti-racists who get them to cheer rant against European-Ame

I'd like to point out that many people were unaware of the derogatory nature of the word "teabag" until very recently.
Whereas pretty much everybody knows the nature of terms like "fag", "FP" .

So let's quit responding as children, shall we?


This group of people were unaware of the potential violence of the people they faced.
Now they know and we all know, some tea partiers are not concerned with fairness or even anything remotely related to health care and economic security issues.
It's all about frothing fury in the name of a "cause" so that fury can be displayed publicly without many repercussions.
People who were seriously concerned about their country have been drowned out by the louder more agitated protester.
__________________

I did not win the Powerball again!


"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
--Jonathan Swift
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to saltwn For This Useful Post:
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2009, 04:07 PM
GottaGo's Avatar
Resident Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hot Spot for Fishermen
Posts: 1,142
Thanks: 504
Thanked 565 Times in 400 Posts
Default Re: Teabaggers punk'd by anti-racists who get them to cheer rant against European-Ame

Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
No.

I never said "cannot be derogatory".

I am saying what MY INTENT on using the word was...

I clearly explained that.

As for OTHER PEOPLE using the word "tea-bagger" in reference to other meanings, that's part of the great thing about the dictionary.
It has MULTIPLE MEANINGS included cause different people use it in different ways.


What you guys really need to stop and do is question how these comments aimed at me mimic the whole "Politically Correct" mindset.
After all, some people complain it is "Politically Correct" that people use an NFL term like "Redskins".
SOME Politically Correct people insist that the term "Redskins" shouldn't be used because the interpretation of the use could be negative, disregarding the intent of the actual use...




Considering the majority of men who have anal sex are actually HETEROSEXUAL, I would hope such a use on your part wouldn't be exclusive towards gay men...
Why don't we try it this way: ask a person who attended a Tea Party what they want to be called? Gays call themselves gay, lesbians refer to themselves as lesbian, and Tea Partiers call them selves, (hold your breath now....) Tea Partiers!

Tea bagging, according to someone I asked, is when a man lets his testicles rest on the givers face when receiving oral sex.

Is that blunt enough for you? Can you not see how it MIGHT be considered a slur?
__________________
Freedom is the only thing that means a damn to me.... you can't fake it" Bad Company, Simple Man
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
against, antiracists, cheer, europeanamerica, get, punkd, rant, teabaggers, them, who

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Search Engine Optimization and SEO Tools
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0