![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Political Wrinkles Book Club Discuss Book Suggestions at the General Discussion; Originally Posted by AlicornsPrayer In otherwords, literature about the condition of self. Chicken Soup for the UNSINKABLE SOUL.. Chicken Soup ... |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Now, I haven't read this book myself. But I found it linked to the other book I posted...And for those interested about discussing conflict literature, I think this might be to your liking...
The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini On one level, The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini is the story of two boys in Afghanistan and Afghan immigrants in America. It is a story set in a culture that has become of increasing interest to Americans since the September 11, 2001 attacks. On this level, it provides a good way for people to learn more about Afghan history and culture in the context of story. Looking at The Kite Runner as a story about culture, however, misses what the book is really about. This is a novel about humanity. This is a story about friendship, loyalty, cruelty, longing for acceptance, redemption and survival. The core story could be set in any culture because it deals with issues that are universal. The Kite Runner looks at how the main character, Amir, deals with a secret in his past and how that secret shaped who he became. It tells of Amir's childhood friendship with Hassan, his relationship with his father and growing up in a privileged place in society. I was drawn in by Amir's voice. I sympathized with him, cheered for him and felt angry with him at different points. Similarly, I became attached to Hassan and his father. The characters became real to me, and it was difficult for me to put the book down and leave their world. |
|
||||
|
Yep, that it will. But we do have a great list of books to start with, and in due time will eventually be one of hopefully many more future discussions...
But always deciding on which one to do first is the hardest. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
||||
|
The Killing of Bonnie Garland: A Question of Justice
Willard Gaylin "Willard Gaylin is a gifted writer who is also a psychiatrist with long years of practice. The book is about an awful murder, but more than that it's about the inability of institutions of society -- Yale, and the criminal justice system -- to deal effectively with immorality and cruelty. The murder is the lens through which Gaylin brings social, moral and psychiatric issues into focus. Twenty years after I first read this book it remains vivid in my mind." I admit that I've read this book three times,it's one of the best books I have ever read. Yes...I could read it "again" and so should you.. You can order a used copy for just $4.00
__________________
"Destiny must be shaped and not left to mere chance."..Spencer Collins |
|
|||
|
Quote:
After we gain a greater insight on that score the absolute most important issue to discuss is the condition of self. Last edited by bhkad; 10-24-2007 at 01:27 AM. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
One, a willingness to find the truth. And that has much to do with our opponents who wish to subvert Americans who haven't the knowledge to recognize their enemy's tactics and so they remain obstinate no matter what the evidence that's presented. The net effect is that someone trying to discern the truth might find it difficult to know which side to support simply because the other side never admits it is wrong. That's one reason discussion can only go so far in helping to achieve clarity on the issue of the WoT and Islam and Jihad. The other thing that's missing from these political discussions is the limitation of the shallow, soundbyte, human reaction people have when dealing with information, especially information which runs counter to their particular beliefs. When I find myself having to post the same information over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again it becomes clear to me that some people simply do not read anything that contradicts their world view. And if you are content to have this dysfunctional stalemate clashing and grinding on here while we discuss books that teach us about ourselves when we will only have a need for that IF we can prevent the world from blowing up, then it's clear to me that you have more of a need to read, and seriously read, books on Jihad than anyone else. Why? Because you think there is time to dawdle. And that's proof positive you aren't seeing things, the most urgent and important things to mankind, clearly. One closing remark... How stereotypical is it that at a time when WWIII and the possible end of the world is being discussed that some people want to self-indulge and learn more about THEMSELVES? |
|
||||
|
bhkad
I've read both of your responses fully. And from what I'm grasping of both of your explinations, is that you want the Book Club to discuss not literature, but be yet another discussion forum for others to air their political stances on current issues...In a more achedemic manner. I respect that. I honestly do. BUT, what you're wanting is not what the forum was asked to be designed as... Literature discussion is about discussing what the author is saying through their characters. Of how the person feels reading the book, in regards to their identifying with the different characters of the book itself. That is in no way 'dawdling' as you put it. Just like songs often speak a personal message to people, so do the characters in a book. And that was what IP, KOS, and myself were discussing about what would make a good book forum. I wish I could explain it better to you then I have. I'd really love to see you participate in this forum. But from the two posts you've put up here, from what I'm reading from your words, you're more interested in making a political statement then anything else. And as such, going that route would unintentionally do what Redd was fearing would occure...Of individuals being at odds in opinions on those very subjects, meaning a more then likely a 'you're wrong', 'no you're wrong' type of responding that goes on in the debate forums themselves. That the 'debate' would become personal attacks if opinions differed... You did this very, very quickly infact. Quote:
Fact is, you don't know at all what my stance is about the war, Islam, or anything else. All you do know is that I'd perfer not to read a book about it, or discuss that book about it. Cause I'm satisfied to discuss the war and politics in forums already designed to discuss such things. But because myself and another said that we'd perfer not to do so, you immediately felt it appropriate to attack assumed beliefs as a defense for your imagined threatened stance on those issues. You decided to take and make it a personal thing, in the form of attack and retaliation response. This forum wasn't invisioned for making a political stances. It's supposed to be about how one views a book on a personal level. Of how they feel a similarity to the characters within that book and the overall message the author is trying to project through his/her characters. It's about personal truths found in literature and it's characters, of how the individual relates to it on a personal level of conciousness. |
|
||||
|
The Kite Runner is a big hit right now - they even sell it in Starbucks
![]() It's the book that was filmed - and caused all the problems for the family of the boy who stars in it, because there is a rape scene in it (the boy is raped). The family has received death threats because of allowing their son to be in the movie. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to tristanrobin For This Useful Post: | ||
|
||||
|
I still think that ANIMAL FARM might be an option
Quote:
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to KnightOfSappho For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|