Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > General Forum > Opinions & Editorials
Register FAQDonate PW Store PW Trivia Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Opinions & Editorials Discuss The Syria Strike Was International Security Theater at the General Forum; The Syria Strike Was International Security Theater It was designed to look as if it would keep us safer, while ...

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2017, 08:40 AM
Senior's Avatar
Political Independent 👌
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,093
Thanks: 1,455
Thanked 1,233 Times in 853 Posts
Default The Syria Strike Was International Security Theater

The Syria Strike Was International Security Theater

It was designed to look as if it would keep us safer, while actually doing nothing of the sort.....

Quote:
BY THERESA HITCHENS
APRIL 9, 2017


White House photo

We are all familiar with the phrase “security theater.” Those people-scanning machines at airports that work less than half of the time but cost local airports millions, not to mention waste everyone’s time at the airport? A border wall that will do nothing to lower crime, or bring back jobs to the U.S. working class? Both are examples of security theater: actions designed to look as if they will keep us safer, while actually doing nothing of the sort. We are seeing the same thing now in Syria, only on a wider scale. U.S. President Donald Trump’s snap decision to bomb a Syrian airfield with cruise missiles — in the wake of an alleged (although not internationally verified) chemical attack by Syrian government forces on the town of Khan Sheikhoun —* is nothing more than “international security theater.” The bombing raid did nothing to stop the long-running Syrian civil war; nor to topple Syrian President Bashar al-Assad; nor to persuade Moscow to reduce its support for him.

Let’s break it down.

The 59 cruise missiles that hit the Al-Shayrat airfield Friday evening (about 4 a.m. local time) reportedly blew up 20 aircraft. But 24 hours later, the airfield was once again sending Syrian warplanes off to strike Khan Sheikhoun. (The Russians were notified an hour or so before the missiles arrived, which surely helped Syrian forces batten down the hatches.) The airstrikes did not destroy any of Assad’s remaining stock of chemical weapons — and nor were they meant to. Striking chemical weapons depots with regular missiles does nothing more than disperse the deadly gas. Further, no single airstrike is going to resolve the Syrian war, nor the massive refugee crisis that has accompanied it. Assad is not going to simply slink away because of a few U.S. cruise missiles. Finally, Russia is hardly backing off. Instead, Moscow has announced that it is withdrawing from cooperation with U.S. forces to deconflict air action, a bid to avoid mistaken attacks on each other. Russian President Vladimir Putin called the strike “an act of aggression” and stated that the U.S. action had violated international law. Which it probably did; not to mention being, perhaps, a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

So, what did the move accomplish? What theater usually does, and why politicians so often fall back on such strategies: it “looks good.” Interestingly, in this case, at the moment it looks good not just for Trump, but also for Putin and even Assad.

First and foremost, and no doubt high on minds at the White House, it made Trump “look presidential” at a time when his approval ratings have been not only in the cellar, but practically buried beneath the cellar. Every politician knows that military action against an external foe (real or not) almost always bring a big jump in popular support. And as expected, Trump’s strike has met mostly with domestic applause: from fellow Republicans, including many in Congress who opposed a similar move by Obama; from much of the mainstream media, earlier this year tagged as an “enemy of the people” by Trump; and, from initial impressions, also from the American public. And no one seems to mind the $50-million price tag.

Second, Trump’s action bolstered his Russian counterpart as well. Vladimir Putin gets to paint the United States as an aggressor, and to rail against Washington for breaching international law. He gets to talk tough for his domestic audience, undermine America’s already abysmal approval rates abroad, and even put some distance between himself and the embattled Trump administration, which is caught up in an investigation of ties and even possible collusion with Russian spies.

Third, even Assad’s reputation has perhaps been burnished rather than further tarred – not, to be honest, that it could get much worse. Assad continues to present himself as the “strongman” of the region, and to freely press his civil war using any and all means. All the while thumbing his nose at the United Nations and the West.

Unfortunately, as with all security theater, international security theater also comes with a cost. Who is paying the price? The American people. The Syrian people. And the rule of law.
Nothing was accomplished. A feel-good gesture. A reality-tv show gimmick to boost ratings for a few days.
__________________
*
Semper Gumby / USMC - Always Be Flexible
*
When the ramp drops, the bullshıt stops
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2017, 09:32 AM
Conservative Sage
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 18,890
Thanks: 12,379
Thanked 13,353 Times in 7,781 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to AZRWinger
Default Re: The Syria Strike Was International Security Theater

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senior View Post
The Syria Strike Was International Security Theater

It was designed to look as if it would keep us safer, while actually doing nothing of the sort.....



Nothing was accomplished. A feel-good gesture. A reality-tv show gimmick to boost ratings for a few days.
Nothing accomplished is an accurate description of this editorial. It is a collection of blind partisan Trump hatred filled with idiotic complaints that Trump violated international law while ignoring the gross violation of humanity by the Assad regime's chemical weapons attack on his own people.

There is an argument to be made for continuing Obama's policy of ignoring Syria but the OP is nothing more than partisan propaganda, political theater.
__________________
If Democrats were confident their nominee actually received more than 80 million votes they wouldn't have more troops occupying Washington, DC than Lincoln had defending the city during the Civil War. Not Joe Biden, Kim Jung Biden.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AZRWinger For This Useful Post:
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2017, 12:40 PM
zoriolus's Avatar
Banjo qd
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: North Carolina
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,104
Thanks: 3,032
Thanked 2,222 Times in 1,540 Posts
Default Re: The Syria Strike Was International Security Theater

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senior View Post
Nothing was accomplished. A feel-good gesture. A reality-tv show gimmick to boost ratings for a few days.
Theresa Hitchens seems to have an ax to grind. The decision to respond to the confirmed sarin attack in a timely manor was the best choice. I don't think it was designed to get rid of Assad. It was a simple straight forward signal to stop gassing people. If he uses his left over chem arsenal again, maybe there'll be a response by other countries such as the UK, French, SA, etc. It's not theater. The strike may have the net result of isolating Syria, Russia, Iran, and NK, maybe not. The UN experts can examine the sarin attack site and the maybe the bombed out air base to gather additional facts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
international, security, strike, syria, the, theater, was

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0