Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > General Forum > Opinions & Editorials
Register FAQDonate PW Store PW Trivia Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Opinions & Editorials Discuss I don't believe you............... at the General Forum; Originally Posted by 40yearfan SS is not off budget. SS is a trust fund. See note from government web-site below: ...

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #171 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2012, 12:27 AM
40yearfan's Avatar
Easy Living
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ.
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,356
Thanks: 369
Thanked 939 Times in 706 Posts
Default Re: I don't believe you...............

Quote:
Originally Posted by 40yearfan View Post
SS is not off budget. SS is a trust fund. See note from government web-site below:



Trust Fund FAQs

As usual, you are wrong. SS has not been off budget since 1990. Money is being paid out of the trust fund and it is financially solvent for at least the next 25 years. Please quit making up numbers. It just makes you look silly.
Sorry about that xcali. I wasn't aware of the changes in 1985 - 1990 to the budgetary process. Please disregard.
__________________
When they discover the center of the universe, a lot of people are going to be disappointed they are not it.
Reply With Quote
  #172 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2012, 09:04 AM
Conservative Sage
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 5,853
Thanks: 1,926
Thanked 2,036 Times in 1,457 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to AZRWinger
Default Re: I don't believe you...............

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xcali View Post
What Bush was doing was going to Congress and asking for Special Appropriations so he could keep the spending from being reflected on the actual budget. When Obama added the War spending they had to account for the spending and any additional spending had to pass through normal appropriations . It was this additional Spending that was added back into the budget that made Obama's spending appear more than it actually was.

Bush was responsible for the economic melt down, the deficits, and the debt. Obama has spent nothing compared to what Bush did.
Bush financed the wars on emergency appropriations so the cost would not be added to the Federal budget baseline. This kept the ten year spending plan from being distorted by the temporary war costs. The emergency appropriations were not hidden, Congress had to vote on them including Democrats in the majority.

Nice touch quoting Obama the Ignorant on including a ten year spending plan in the budget proposal. That has been done for decades. But wait, Obama expanded the plan to 12 years with heavy cuts in the last 2 years after he is long out of office.

By placing the war cost back into the Federal baseline Obama inflates spending across the board. He then makes the deceptive claim he is cutting spending by subtracting war costs from future budgets.

Last edited by AZRWinger; 09-02-2012 at 09:13 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #173 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2012, 09:14 AM
Xcali's Avatar
Scholar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Arkansas
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,345
Thanks: 262
Thanked 968 Times in 635 Posts
Default Re: I don't believe you...............

Quote:
Originally Posted by AZRWinger View Post
Bush financed the wars on emergency appropriations so the cost would not be added to the Federal budget baseline. This kept the ten year spending plan from being distorted by the temporary war costs. The emergency appropriations were not hidden, Congress had to vote on them including Democrats in the majority.
I understand that, and by using the Emergency Appropriations he was able to keep the Spending off budget so that it would not be reflected in the deficits. It goes toward the national debt but does not count as deficit spending.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AZRWinger View Post
By placing the war cost back into the Federal baseline Obama inflates spending across the board. He then makes the deceptive claim he is cutting spending by subtracting war costs from future budgets.
By placing the Spending back On Budget we are getting the true numbers in the budget and the deficits increased by the amount of War spending. I'm not aware of any claim from Obama that he is subtracting war costs from Future budgets... Considering he doesn't have one of his own budgets passed I'd say that claim is false.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #174 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2012, 09:32 AM
Xcali's Avatar
Scholar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Arkansas
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,345
Thanks: 262
Thanked 968 Times in 635 Posts
Default Re: I don't believe you...............

Quote:
Originally Posted by 40yearfan View Post
And as usual, you can't defend what I said, so you hurl insults and change the subject. The Obama Stimulus was in the 2009 spending, so you can't charge that whole deficit to Bush. Obama owns over 1/2 of it. That means your whole premise is wrong.
Afraid your dreaming there dude..

Ok, So suppose I give Obama credit for his part of spending in the 2009 year.. That means Bush's Deficit would be 1.38 trillion dollars. The CBO estimated before the Stimulus passed that if it was implemented it would raise the Deficit for 2009 by 185 billion dollars. So Obama spent a tiny fraction of the deficit in 2009.. Most of his stimulus spending went on the 2010 and 2011 deficits.

So Bush still gets credit for the First and Largest 1.4 trillion dollar deficit.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #175 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2012, 09:58 AM
Xcali's Avatar
Scholar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Arkansas
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,345
Thanks: 262
Thanked 968 Times in 635 Posts
Default Re: I don't believe you...............

Quote:
Originally Posted by 40yearfan View Post
As usual, you are wrong. SS has not been off budget since 1990. Money is being paid out of the trust fund and it is financially solvent for at least the next 25 years. Please quit making up numbers. It just makes you look silly.
I saw your other post so I'm ignoring the insults.. but I would like to respond to the post...

Social Security is not a trust fund. Social Security is a Pay as you go Retirement Program. This is one reason, THE MAIN reason I am disappointed in Obama on. The Payroll Tax.

Revenues that come into the Government each month through the Payroll tax are used to pay current monthly Benefits. If there is excess revenues then that Money goes into the SS trust fund, by way of Special Securities purchased by the Government. Basically the Government borrows this money and issues an IOU to the trust fund. As long as there is more coming in each month than is needed to pay monthly benefits then the Government does not have to buy back those securities. If say one month the Revenues drop off and they don't have the cash to pay monthly benefits, then the Government by Law has to pay off enough IOU's to cover those benefits.

When Reagan created this reform back in 1983 it was his plan to use the surplus to fund government spending. He kept SS on Budget for a time to allow the surplus to build, but it was written into the Law that in 1990 SS would go Off Budget . This was to hide the additional spending from the surplus by keeping it off the budget. Clinton used the surplus to help close the deficits when he balanced the budget in the last 2000's. When Clinton left office there was almost 3 trillion dollars in the Surplus. That doesn't mean we had that much money in there, that money was in the form of IOU's . The Government blew through the Surplus .

Then Obama cut the payroll tax down to 4% for Employees. This put SS in the red starting in 2010 and into the future. With unemployment still at 8% and the payroll tax still at 4% there is not enough revenues coming in each month to cover benefits being paid out. This means the Government each month now has to buy back enough Securities to cover current costs. This means the Government has to Borrow more because they used the Surplus as a piggy bank and allowed it to run dry. That spending is now going on the debt because the payroll revenues are still in the red.

Social Security is not solvent, it's running on it's last leg . Once the surplus has been depleted and all the securities have been paid back by the government the program will rely on whatever revenue comes in each month. This means benefits will have to be cut for some or all ..

Why do you think Republicans have been trying for years to Eliminate the program? They are trying to find ways to get out of paying back this debt. This is tax payers money that the Government has squandered and now they look for ways to get out of paying it back.

Obama's biggest mistake was cutting the payroll tax. When it was at 6.2% the program was at least solvent. In order to fix it we need to raise that payroll tax back to 6.2 % or go to 7%.. We need to pass a jobs bill and infrastructure bill to drive unemployment back down below 4%. We need to eliminate the Cap on SSI payments. and if that isn't enough we should extend the retirement age to 70 over a period of time...

ok.. rant over....
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #176 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2012, 04:49 PM
40yearfan's Avatar
Easy Living
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ.
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,356
Thanks: 369
Thanked 939 Times in 706 Posts
Default Re: I don't believe you...............

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xcali View Post
I saw your other post so I'm ignoring the insults.. but I would like to respond to the post...

Social Security is not a trust fund. Social Security is a Pay as you go Retirement Program. This is one reason, THE MAIN reason I am disappointed in Obama on. The Payroll Tax.

Revenues that come into the Government each month through the Payroll tax are used to pay current monthly Benefits. If there is excess revenues then that Money goes into the SS trust fund, by way of Special Securities purchased by the Government. Basically the Government borrows this money and issues an IOU to the trust fund. As long as there is more coming in each month than is needed to pay monthly benefits then the Government does not have to buy back those securities. If say one month the Revenues drop off and they don't have the cash to pay monthly benefits, then the Government by Law has to pay off enough IOU's to cover those benefits.

When Reagan created this reform back in 1983 it was his plan to use the surplus to fund government spending. He kept SS on Budget for a time to allow the surplus to build, but it was written into the Law that in 1990 SS would go Off Budget . This was to hide the additional spending from the surplus by keeping it off the budget. Clinton used the surplus to help close the deficits when he balanced the budget in the last 2000's. When Clinton left office there was almost 3 trillion dollars in the Surplus. That doesn't mean we had that much money in there, that money was in the form of IOU's . The Government blew through the Surplus .

Then Obama cut the payroll tax down to 4% for Employees. This put SS in the red starting in 2010 and into the future. With unemployment still at 8% and the payroll tax still at 4% there is not enough revenues coming in each month to cover benefits being paid out. This means the Government each month now has to buy back enough Securities to cover current costs. This means the Government has to Borrow more because they used the Surplus as a piggy bank and allowed it to run dry. That spending is now going on the debt because the payroll revenues are still in the red.

Social Security is not solvent, it's running on it's last leg . Once the surplus has been depleted and all the securities have been paid back by the government the program will rely on whatever revenue comes in each month. This means benefits will have to be cut for some or all ..

This is at least 25 years down the road and it could be as much as 75 years away. Check the government web-site I have listed at the bottom.

Why do you think Republicans have been trying for years to Eliminate the program? They are trying to find ways to get out of paying back this debt. This is tax payers money that the Government has squandered and now they look for ways to get out of paying it back.

Complete and utter BS. Republicans didn't want to eliminate it, they wanted to get it out of the control of the federal government and let individuals control their own funds. Democrats were against this because it meant they would no longer have these funds to use for their spending.

Obama's biggest mistake was cutting the payroll tax. When it was at 6.2% the program was at least solvent. In order to fix it we need to raise that payroll tax back to 6.2 % or go to 7%.. We need to pass a jobs bill and infrastructure bill to drive unemployment back down below 4%. We need to eliminate the Cap on SSI payments. and if that isn't enough we should extend the retirement age to 70 over a period of time...

The only thing we agree on.

ok.. rant over....
First you say SS isn't a trust fund and in the very next sentence, you say the money goes into a SS trust fund. You aren't making any sense. From the Social Security office of the government:

Trust Fund FAQs

The first question is what are the Social Security Trust Funds. The answer:

Quote:

The Social Security Trust Funds are the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) and the Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Funds. These funds are accounts managed by the Department of the Treasury. They serve two purposes: (1) they provide an accounting mechanism for tracking all income to and disbursements from the trust funds, and (2) they hold the accumulated assets. These accumulated assets provide automatic spending authority to pay benefits. The Social Security Act limits trust fund expenditures to benefits and administrative costs.
Benefits to retired workers and their families, and to families of deceased workers, are paid from the OASI Trust Fund. Benefits to disabled workers and their families are paid from the DI Trust Fund. More than 98 percent of total disbursements in 2011 were for benefit payments.

A Board of Trustees oversees the financial operations of the trust funds. The Board reports annually to the Congress on the financial status of the trust funds.
So if the federal government considers Social Security trust funds, how can you claim it to be different?
__________________
When they discover the center of the universe, a lot of people are going to be disappointed they are not it.
Reply With Quote
  #177 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2012, 05:13 PM
Xcali's Avatar
Scholar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Arkansas
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,345
Thanks: 262
Thanked 968 Times in 635 Posts
Default Re: I don't believe you...............

Quote:
Originally Posted by 40yearfan View Post
First you say SS isn't a trust fund and in the very next sentence, you say the money goes into a SS trust fund. You aren't making any sense. From the Social Security office of the government:
Trust Fund FAQs
you said this...
Quote:
Originally Posted by 40yearfan View Post
SS is not off budget. SS is a trust fund.
Which is not true. Social Security is the Program, the Program will and has worked without the Trust Funds. The Trust Funds were created to keep over payments into the program by building a surplus.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 40yearfan View Post
So if the federal government considers Social Security trust funds, how can you claim it to be different?
The is a difference between Social Security and Social Security Trust Fund... They are not one and the same.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #178 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2012, 05:19 PM
40yearfan's Avatar
Easy Living
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ.
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,356
Thanks: 369
Thanked 939 Times in 706 Posts
Default Re: I don't believe you...............

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xcali View Post
Afraid your dreaming there dude..

Ok, So suppose I give Obama credit for his part of spending in the 2009 year.. That means Bush's Deficit would be 1.38 trillion dollars. The CBO estimated before the Stimulus passed that if it was implemented it would raise the Deficit for 2009 by 185 billion dollars. So Obama spent a tiny fraction of the deficit in 2009.. Most of his stimulus spending went on the 2010 and 2011 deficits.

So Bush still gets credit for the First and Largest 1.4 trillion dollar deficit.
This guy explains it better than I can:


Quote:
As Art Laffer and Steve Moore showed in the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday, President Bush began a spending spree in his term that erased most of the gains in reduced government spending as a percent of GDP achieved by the Republican Congress in the 1990s led by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, in conjunction with President Clinton. But for fiscal year 2009, President Bush in February, 2008 proposed a budget with just a 3% spending increase over the prior year. Fiscal year 2009 ran from October 1, 2008 until September 30, 2009. President Obama’s term began on January 20, 2009.

Recall, however, that in 2008 Congress was controlled by Democrat majorities, with Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House, and the restless Senator Obama already running for President, just four years removed from his glorious career as a state Senator in the Illinois legislature. As Hans Bader reported on May 26 for the Washington Examiner, the budget approved and implemented by Pelosi, Obama and the rest of the Congressional Democrat majorities provided for a 17.9 percent increase in spending for fiscal 2009!

Actually, President Obama and the Democrats were even more deeply involved in the fiscal 2009 spending explosion than that. As Bader also reports, “The Democrat Congress [in 2008], confident Obama was going to win in 2008, passed only three of fiscal 2009’s 12 appropriations bills (Defense, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and Homeland Security). The Democrat Congress passed the rest of them [in 2009], and [President] Obama signed them.” So Obama played a very direct role in the runaway fiscal 2009 spending explosion.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterfer...world-history/

So the budget you want to blame on Bush was passed and implemented by the Democrats who controlled the House and Senate at that time. And quite a bit of the budget was left until 2009 after Obama got into the White House. Can you blame that on Bush also?
__________________
When they discover the center of the universe, a lot of people are going to be disappointed they are not it.

Last edited by 40yearfan; 09-02-2012 at 05:22 PM.. Reason: Forgot to add the web-site.
Reply With Quote
  #179 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2012, 05:21 PM
40yearfan's Avatar
Easy Living
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ.
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,356
Thanks: 369
Thanked 939 Times in 706 Posts
Default Re: I don't believe you...............

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xcali View Post
you said this...


Which is not true. Social Security is the Program, the Program will and has worked without the Trust Funds. The Trust Funds were created to keep over payments into the program by building a surplus.



The is a difference between Social Security and Social Security Trust Fund... They are not one and the same.
Total BS. The federal government says SS is kept in trust funds and there is only one SS. Why can't you admit you are wrong?
__________________
When they discover the center of the universe, a lot of people are going to be disappointed they are not it.
Reply With Quote
  #180 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2012, 05:27 PM
Xcali's Avatar
Scholar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Arkansas
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,345
Thanks: 262
Thanked 968 Times in 635 Posts
Default Re: I don't believe you...............

Quote:
Originally Posted by 40yearfan View Post
Total BS. The federal government says SS is kept in trust funds and there is only one SS. Why can't you admit you are wrong?
The Social Security Surplus is kept in trust funds.. Monthly checks are paid by revenues taken in each month...

Because I'm not wrong...
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
believe, dont, you

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0