Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > General Forum > Open Discussion
Register FAQDonate PW Store PW Trivia Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Open Discussion Discuss Should Trump pursue the matter of the election? at the General Forum; Originally Posted by FrancSevin BS. There is plenty of evidence. Both direct testimony, forensic and statistical. Biden never won a ...

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2021, 02:41 AM
saltwn's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Esto perpetua
Posts: 85,007
Thanks: 56,370
Thanked 26,593 Times in 19,072 Posts
Send a message via AIM to saltwn Send a message via MSN to saltwn Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: Should Trump pursue the matter of the election?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrancSevin View Post
BS. There is plenty of evidence. Both direct testimony, forensic and statistical. Biden never won a case in court. Trump's team never lost a case in court because no court ever heard the cases. Each was able to reject suits based on technical issues. No Standing seemed to be the popular dodge.

Since none of the evidence could see the light of day in a courtroom, the Public cannot see the truth or lie of it. That doesn't negate the evidence by any measure counselor. And you should damn well know it.

I take it back. You just might be a lawyer as only a lawyer would be so audacious as to try and pull that crap.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumara View Post
People on both sides of the political aisle, except for the very stupid, know that corrupt, senile, Joe Biden didn't have a legitimate win over the most popular president ever, and there is no reason to allow a fraudulent election to stand. You won't see it on the MSM, but Trump signed an EO in 2018 about what he could do in the event of foreign interference in our elections. He is still the president and can still do something about it based on that very prescient EO. The latest to come out is that Italy also had CIA servers that switched results. Since Italy is supposed to be one of our nation's NATO allies, that presents a huge problem for them and for those domestic traitors who colluded with the numerous foreign countries who planned to take our country down by installing a globalist puppet.

Trump is still our president, and there is no reason to allow a rigged election to install a criminal the people didn't vote for. Oh, a few idiots voted for him, but not enough for Biden to win, and it's disgusting to see people on both sides believe we need to let the results of a stolen election to stand. That is BS.
btw be sure and go on parler to get ted cruz new email so he can contact you for money before they shut the chat room down sunday.
__________________
Prince Phillip was one of the last of that greatest generation who kept the peace and built Western liberal freedom. ~Scott Morrison, PM Australia
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2021, 08:33 AM
Constant_Slothrop's Avatar
Scholar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,344
Thanks: 7
Thanked 358 Times in 317 Posts
Default Re: Should Trump pursue the matter of the election?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrancSevin View Post
BS. There is plenty of evidence. Both direct testimony, forensic and statistical. Biden never won a case in court. Trump's team never lost a case in court because no court ever heard the cases. Each was able to reject suits based on technical issues. No Standing seemed to be the popular dodge.

Since none of the evidence could see the light of day in a courtroom, the Public cannot see the truth or lie of it. That doesn't negate the evidence by any measure counselor. And you should damn well know it.

I take it back. You just might be a lawyer as only a lawyer would be so audacious as to try and pull that crap.
This is false. Here’s just one example. This is from a decision by a federal district court judge appointed by Trump:

Quote:
With the Electoral College meeting just days away, the Court declined to address the issues in piecemeal fashion and instead provided plaintiff with an expedited hearing on the merits of his claims.

****

And, on the merits of plaintiff’s claims, the Court now further concludes that plaintiff has not proved that defendants violated his rights under the Electors Clause.

****

Plaintiff’s Electors Clause claims fail as a matter of law and fact.

****
This Court has allowed plaintiff the chance to make his case and he has lost on the merits. In his reply brief, plaintiff “asks that the Rule of Law be followed.” (Pl. Br., ECF No. 109.) It has been.

****

1. Plaintiff’s complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction, ECF No. 6, is DENIED as moot.3. Defendants’ motions to dismiss, ECF No. 69, 71, 78, 84, 86, 96, 97, and 99, areGRANTED.
https://www.wpr.org/sites/default/files/20314498782.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2021, 09:44 AM
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,723
Thanks: 10,548
Thanked 8,578 Times in 5,089 Posts
Default Re: Should Trump pursue the matter of the election?

Quote:
Originally Posted by saltwn View Post
btw be sure and go on parler to get ted cruz new email so he can contact you for money before they shut the chat room down sunday.
Another brilliant Salty post.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
election, matter, pursue, should, the, trump

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0