Sing for Change Obama - Page 2

bhkad · #11 (**permalink**) 10-01-2008, 09:05 PM

The official Obama campaign page has been deleted. This is the classic and typical behavior of criminals. When the evidence threatens to implicate them they erase it. Only in this Obamated political climate do we overlook this type of behavior.

This is the link to the page which was erased.

Quote:

1 - 10 of about 185,000 for sing venice kids obama. (0.22 seconds)
Search Results

1.
Barack Obama and Joe Biden: The Change We Need | Hope Tacos ...
Aug 20, 2008 ... Tags: barack obama, grassroots, Sing for Change, Venice ... in Venice, when 22 children, ages 5-12, gathered to sing original songs in the ...
my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/HopeTacos/gG59KJ - 34k - Cached - Similar pages

Barack Obama and Joe Biden: The Change We Need | Invalid URL

How can anyone trust them?

And lest you think the page never existed, I took a cue from cnredd who screen grabbed a site that he believed would have been deleted by the Obums.

Here is what the page looked like yesterday!

Patriots and freedom fans should always record the pages you think the Obamabots might delete so that they can't hide the truth. The bastards!

dabateman · #12 (**permalink**) 10-01-2008, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhkad

The official Obama campaign page has been deleted. This is the classic and typical behavior of criminals. When the evidence threatens to implicate them they erase it. Only in this Obamated political climate do we overlook this type of behavior.

This is the link to the page which was erased.

Barack Obama and Joe Biden: The Change We Need | Invalid URL

How can anyone trust them?

And lest you think the page never existed, I took a cue from cnredd who screen grabbed a site that he believed would have been deleted by the Obums.

Here is what the page looked like yesterday!

Patriots and freedom fans should always record the pages you think the Obamabots might delete so that they can't hide the truth. The bastards!

Quote:

User-Contributed Content
Content posted on our Website by our users is not guaranteed by us as to accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, and we do not endorse any content posted by our users. It is the responsibility of our Website users to evaluate the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any content posted on our Website by other users.

You agree not to upload, post or otherwise make available on our Website any material protected by copyright, trademark or other proprietary right without the express permission of the owner of the copyright, trademark or other proprietary right. You agree and acknowledge that you have the burden of determining whether any material is or is not protected by copyright. By submitting material, you grant (or warrant that the owner of such material has expressly granted) to us the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive right and license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate and distribute such material (in whole or in part) worldwide and/or to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or hereafter developed for the full term of any copyright that may exist in such material. You also permit any other user of the Website to access, view, store or reproduce the material for that user's personal use. You grant us the right to edit, copy, publish and distribute any material you make available to us.. You will indemnify us for, from and against all claims, losses, costs and expenses resulting from the content and information you supply.

You may not post or otherwise make available on our Website any content that is illegal, obscene, threatening, defamatory, or otherwise injurious to third parties. You may not impersonate any person or entity, or otherwise mislead as to the origin of your content. Further, you may not make use of our services to forge e-mail headers, or send bulk unsolicited e-mail messages. We have the right, but not the obligation, to monitor the content posted on our Website to determine compliance with our Terms of Service and/or to satisfy any law, regulation or government request. We have the right, in our sole discretion, to edit, refuse to post or remove any material submitted to or posted on our Website including, but not limited to, material that is unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic, graphic, or otherwise objectionable.

Barack Obama and Joe Biden: The Change We Need | Terms of Service

It's a BLOG that is monitored and the campaign takes down items that are posted by everyday citizens, not the campaign. Getting in a uproar because some person in BFE posted something on Obama's blog is beyond childish.

What I want to know is where is such a statement on the McCain website? He allows people to post. Is he not going to remove information? Of course he's going to, he just doesn't tell them about it.

cnredd · #13 (**permalink**) 10-02-2008, 03:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dabateman

It's a BLOG that is monitored and the campaign takes down items that are posted by everyday citizens, not the campaign. Getting in a uproar because some person in BFE posted something on Obama's blog is beyond childish.

Your point here is something I've brught up a couple of times on this forum...

Obama COULD moderate his forums by greenlighting blogs once they've been approved by the people he would put in change of such things, but instead, he allows deviousness and scum to be made public on his blog BEFORE his "moderation team" catches it...

That would be the prudent thing to do...But as we've seen, it's much better, in Obama's eyes, to have his forum open to deviousness and scum and catch it LATER...

That way, objective voters will base their opinions on bullsh*t, and he can claim innocence...

dabateman · #14 (**permalink**) 10-02-2008, 03:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cnredd

Your point here is something I've brught up a couple of times on this forum...

Obama COULD moderate his forums by greenlighting blogs once they've been approved by the people he would put in change of such things, but instead, he allows deviousness and scum to be made public on his blog BEFORE his "moderation team" catches it...

That would be the prudent thing to do...But as we've seen, it's much better, in Obama's eyes, to have his forum open to deviousness and scum and catch it LATER...

That way, objective voters will base their opinions on bullsh*t, and he can claim innocence...

You are making assumptions as to motivation. You know about assumptions... It is inefficient to require approval before the post. It is more efficient to review the posts after the fact. It's a matter of man hours and staffing. When the post is public, you have more people monitoring the site for free because the report posts.

cnredd · #15 (**permalink**) 10-02-2008, 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dabateman

You are making assumptions as to motivation. You know about assumptions... It is inefficient to require approval before the post. It is more efficient to review the posts after the fact. It's a matter of man hours and staffing. When the post is public, you have more people monitoring the site for free because the report posts.

Not at all!...

Every person's blog submittion can go into a queue...It sits there until a moderator skims it over and gives it a greenlight...

This could be done 4 or 5 times a day with minimal delay...At the MOST, a legitimate blog would have to wait 24 hours to become public...Probably less than 2 hours if they have 4 volunteers on it checking in a few times a day...

Big deal...For someone that's trying to become the president of the country, making bloggers wait a few hours before their posts become public so they can be greenlighted is inconsequential...and MUCH less damaging than having their site host anti-Semetic and communist blogs before they check them...

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode