Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > General Forum > Open Discussion
Register FAQDonate PW Store PW Trivia Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Open Discussion Discuss Trey Gowdy injects Benghazi into the 2016 campaign at the General Forum; Duh, shocking Is Trey Gowdy planning a July surprise? The chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi went to ground ...

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2016, 07:34 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PNW
Gender: Male
Posts: 70,513
Thanks: 22,404
Thanked 18,920 Times in 13,935 Posts
Default Trey Gowdy injects Benghazi into the 2016 campaign

Duh, shocking

Is Trey Gowdy planning a July surprise?

The chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi went to ground after he and his colleagues grilled Hillary Clinton in October. They haven’t had a single hearing since then (and had only three public hearings before that one), though they occasionally send news releases reminding the world that their 700-day-old investigation continues.

But that is about to change. Gowdy, after blowing through several previous deadlines he set, has said to expect a final report “before summer,” and Republicans say they are drafting it now. In another indication that the rollout is approaching, Gowdy last month stopped giving Democrats transcripts of witness interviews. This move, ostensibly to prevent leaks, diminishes the minority’s ability respond to allegations contained in the majority report.

Depending on how long the declassification review takes, the Benghazi report is on track to drop by mid-July, just before Congress recesses for the conventions and at a time when Republicans will be in need of a distraction from the Trump-Cruz standoff. If the review takes longer (they typically last from a few weeks to a several months), it could come out in September, in the campaign’s homestretch.

Either scenario would confirm what critics of the panel have said all along (and what Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy incautiously confirmed) — that the panel is a political exercise designed to damage Clinton. Fox News host Greta van Susteren, writing in the Huffington Post a year ago, argued that “dragging the investigation into 2016 looks political” and that releasing the report right before the election “looks awful” and “sends a bad message about fairness.”

If the report comes out in 2016, she wrote, “it is fair to draw an adverse inference against the Committee — an adverse inference of playing politics. . . . Whatever the findings are in this investigation — it will forever be plagued by allegations of unfairness, and politics if this investigation is dragged into 2016.”

Back then, Gowdy told van Susteren that “I want it done before 2016” and that “it’s not going to come out in the middle of 2016.” The panel had originally contemplated finishing work in October 2015. Gowdy later shifted that to the end of 2015, then this spring.
He will argue that Obama administration foot-dragging slowed the investigation; one batch of documents, delivered Friday, had been requested 17 months earlier. But it’s hard to pin the delay on the White House when the committee has continued in recent weeks to add new witnesses. The panel waited to request interviews with former CIA director David Petraeus and former defense secretary Leon Panetta until after Clinton testified. Those two, along with national security adviser Susan Rice and deputy Ben Rhodes, are among at least 35 interviewed since October. Though most of the committee’s work has been a retread of previous investigations, it claims it has received more than 72,000 pages of records not seen by other congressional committees — not exactly a picture of stonewalling.

Gowdy and his staff, apparently aware of the perception problem, have been releasing defensive statements to the public. When the report is released, “I’m confident the value and fairness of our investigation will then be abundantly clear to everyone,” Gowdy said on April 8. The majority on April 6 issued a statement taking issue with the “idea that the committee’s October hearing [with Clinton] was ‘a flop’ that produced ‘no new information.’ ” Gowdy previously promised the report findings would be “eye-opening.”

One eye-opening thing has already happened: Gregory Hicks, the U.S. diplomat in Libya who criticized the administration response, is now on detail from the State Department working as a legislative assistant to Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), who previously said Hicks’s “shocking testimony” confirmed a “Benghazi whitewash” by the administration.

Another eye-opening thing: The panel never agreed on rules or a budget (some $6.5 million has been spent). And the probe, after a respectable start, quickly devolved into the mix of unfounded allegations, selective leaks and partisan sniping that characterized the preceding Benghazi investigation by Rep. Darrel Issa’s oversight panel.

Democrats don’t expect to see the majority’s report before it is made public. Rep. Elijah Cummings (Md.), the top Democrat on the panel, said in a statement Wednesday that he expects “an excessively long rehash of old Republican allegations that were disproved long ago.”

Expect a lot of findings questioning Clinton’s honesty (she told her family the Benghazi attack was the work of terrorists but misled the American public), judgment (her policy led to the Libya attack) and humanity (she was indifferent to diplomats’ security). These themes dovetail nicely with the general-election campaign Republicans plan to run against Clinton. This, like the timing of the Benghazi report, is a curious coincidence.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...6c5_story.html
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2016, 08:36 AM
Conservative Sage
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 17,586
Thanks: 10,932
Thanked 11,524 Times in 6,866 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to AZRWinger
Default Re: Trey Gowdy injects Benghazi into the 2016 campaign

Aww, the rancorously partisan WaPo editorial is upset because the committee will not parrot the Democrat propaganda about Benghazi. The Obama administration delays document production and Democrat committee members decry the committee as "political" for daring to finally investigate Saint Hillary's role in the cover up.

In a moronic display of partisan cheer leading the Democrat mouth organ WaPo first complains the committee hasn't provided a public spectacle for months by conducting public interviews with high profile witnesses while ignoring the fact that a systematic investigation would take time to analyze evidence privately before issuing a report. No doubt the WaPo would reject the notion that it's investigative reporters reveal the information they collect piecemeal while the story is being written but they have no problem braying insistence the Republicans investigating Benghazi do exactly that.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to AZRWinger For This Useful Post:
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2016, 09:22 AM
zoriolus's Avatar
Banjo qd
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: North Carolina
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,104
Thanks: 3,032
Thanked 2,222 Times in 1,540 Posts
Default Re: Trey Gowdy injects Benghazi into the 2016 campaign

I expect the report to include, in detail, the deficiencies of the ARB. It may also confirm some conclusions of the ARB. Keep up the good work Mr. Gowdy.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to zoriolus For This Useful Post:
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2016, 09:27 AM
WallyWager's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Michigan
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,873
Thanks: 1,576
Thanked 9,030 Times in 5,773 Posts
Default Re: Trey Gowdy injects Benghazi into the 2016 campaign

The good work of what?

Using a terrorist attack for political gains?

Disgusting.
__________________
"I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side." - Donald Trump, on pedophile Jeff Epstein.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to WallyWager For This Useful Post:
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2016, 11:27 AM
zoriolus's Avatar
Banjo qd
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: North Carolina
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,104
Thanks: 3,032
Thanked 2,222 Times in 1,540 Posts
Default Re: Trey Gowdy injects Benghazi into the 2016 campaign

Quote:
Originally Posted by WallyWager View Post
The good work of what?

Using a terrorist attack for political gains?

Disgusting.
It's been proven a very difficult job trying to get documents from this administration whether through request, subpoena, or FOIA. Fast and Furious is an example. Gowdy has persevered in battles with the State Dept., reluctant witnesses, Elijah Cummings, and what's his name at the WaPo. I would rather read the final report sooner than later. It seems that the process has been made more complicated by the fact that HRC's documents weren't conveniently accessible. Does anyone know if the FBI was able to retrieve anything from the servers?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2016, benghazi, campaign, gowdy, injects, into, the, trey

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0