McCain wants to follow Bin Laden to the gates of hell - Page 3

saltwn · #21 (**permalink**) 09-01-2008, 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhkad

Bin Laden is a symbol. The entire world of extremist Islamism would still have been operating with impunity had we mounted a multi-billion dollar wild goose chase for OBL in 2001.

Tell us what you know about Blackjack Pershing and Pancho Villa, Brainiac.

Just thought I'd throw this in cause I love history (in shards and tidbits).
One of my ancestors was a mercenary for the Federals, and was captured by Poncho Villa. Great-great something grandpa was told he could fight with them or die immediately. So a guy of Greek ancestry, living in America, fought for the Mexican revolutionaries! Then some Americans captured him and put him in prison for awhile. There he used to tick off the guards by playing "Yankee Doodle Dandy" on a little flute that he had made while in prison.

(Hey, but according to my grandmother it paid well.)

cnredd · #22 (**permalink**) 09-01-2008, 03:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saltwn

which brings us to that same question Obama asked during the debates. Why are we allied w/ Pakistan?

Nuuuuu...cleeeeee...arrrrr...wea...ponsssss...

You want the radicals taking over control of the "red button"?...You know...the ones who yell "Death to America" everytime someone breaks a fingernail?...

saltwn · #23 (**permalink**) 09-01-2008, 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cnredd

Nuuuuu...cleeeeee...arrrrr...wea...ponsssss...

You want the radicals taking over control of the "red button"?...You know...the ones who yell "Death to America" everytime someone breaks a fingernail?...

O.K., You sold me on that one.
See? If people would all just annunciate, I'd get the picture eventually!

dabateman · #24 (**permalink**) 09-01-2008, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhkad

Websites are not sentient beings. Websites can not care. But if they could care you would offend every one within which you posted.

You would offend them with your ignorance of the facts.

You would offend them with your sloth in looking up the facts.

You would offend them with your lack of curiosity to learn.

You would offend them with your grammar.

You would offend them with your vanity.

You would offend them with your breath.

You may go and practice better oral hygiene.

What you need is a mental douche.

Because your brain is fucked.

Wow... You think you know so much. It's entertaining to see you attempt insult.

1. Ignorance of facts and letting facts be facts are two different things. A blue baseball hat is nothing more than a blue baseball hat, but you believe that we should look beyond the surface. This blue baseball hat must mean that the wearer of this hat likes baseball. Maybe it means he works in the sun. Maybe it means that he's trying to hide his face. Maybe it means that he is a Dallas Cowboys fan because it's blue... There aren't enough facts to support any of the conclusions. He hasn't given us enough answers to eliminate the assumptions I've made. He must be the Anti-Christ or at least the Manchurian Candidate.

2. I don't have a problem with the facts. I enjoy the research. I have a problem with the manner in which those people you use to support your claims half-a$$ed associate facts. They use flawed logic. "Jackie O wore big sunglasses. I wear big sunglasses. Therefore I am Jackie O."

3. I have a passion for learning FACTS, not illogically drawn conclusions like the one listed above.

4. I would rather debate the issue than worry about grammar. It's true. Perhaps I should be put in some facility for that because it doesn't match your belief system.

5. Funny Mr. Internet Flame, how would you know about my vanity?

6. Funny Mr. Internet Flame, how would you know about my breath?

7. Funny Mr. Internet Flame, what would you know about my hygiene habits?

The answer to those three questions are the same. You couldn't, just like you apparently KNOW nothing about what you've been posting, you just want us to make assumptions based upon a string of unrelated facts. You want us to be lazy and come to the same uneducated decision you have.

You are just frustrated that someone has finally called you out on the logic you have been using. Fine. Be frustrated, but if you want to prove a point, then FLIPPIN PROVE A POINT instead of posting this absurd list of people and organizations and expect us to draw conclusions based upon that list. If you have something that the national media doesn't have, and if you think that we are too stupid to see what you see, then walk us through it step by step. But you must be too good for that, or too afraid that we could point out the flaws in your logic as you go.

Have a good day wallowing around in your mess.

bhkad · #25 (**permalink**) 09-01-2008, 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dabateman

Wow... You think you know so much. It's entertaining to see you attempt insult.

1. Ignorance of facts and letting facts be facts are two different things. A blue baseball hat is nothing more than a blue baseball hat, but you believe that we should look beyond the surface. This blue baseball hat must mean that the wearer of this hat likes baseball. Maybe it means he works in the sun. Maybe it means that he's trying to hide his face. Maybe it means that he is a Dallas Cowboys fan because it's blue... There aren't enough facts to support any of the conclusions. He hasn't given us enough answers to eliminate the assumptions I've made. He must be the Anti-Christ or at least the Manchurian Candidate.

2. I don't have a problem with the facts. I enjoy the research. I have a problem with the manner in which those people you use to support your claims half-a$ associate facts. They use flawed logic. "Jackie O wore big sunglasses. I wear big sunglasses. Therefore I am Jackie O."

3. I have a passion for learning FACTS, not illogically drawn conclusions like the one listed above.

4. I would rather debate the issue than worry about grammar. It's true. Perhaps I should be put in some facility for that because it doesn't match your belief system.

5. Funny Mr. Internet Flame, how would you know about my vanity?

6. Funny Mr. Internet Flame, how would you know about my breath?

7. Funny Mr. Internet Flame, what would you know about my hygiene habits?

The answer to those three questions are the same. You couldn't, just like you apparently KNOW nothing about what you've been posting, you just want us to make assumptions based upon a string of unrelated facts. You want us to be lazy and come to the same uneducated decision you have.

You are just frustrated that someone has finally called you out on the logic you have been using. Fine. Be frustrated, but if you want to prove a point, then FLIPPIN PROVE A POINT instead of posting this absurd list of people and organizations and expect us to draw conclusions based upon that list. If you have something that the national media doesn't have, and if you think that we are too stupid to see what you see, then walk us through it step by step. But you must be too good for that, or too afraid that we could point out the flaws in your logic as you go.

Have a good day wallowing around in your mess.

If you insist on boring us and wasting space why don't you at least do your part in helping us keep this country working the way it should.

Urge Obama to clear up the questions we have about Ayers, Rezko and the Iraqi Billionaire.

Republican * National * Committee

Obama Should Come Clean On Ayers, Rezko And the Iraqi Billionaire - WSJ.com

dabateman · #26 (**permalink**) 09-01-2008, 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhkad

If you insist on boring us and wasting space why don't you at least do your part in helping us keep this country working the way it should.

This is why I'm voting for Obama!!!

Urge Obama to clear up the questions we have about Ayers, Rezko and the Iraqi Billionaire.

I will be more than glad to once McCain clears up his positions on Christian Dominionism, his constant flip flops on social issues, and his involvement in the Georgia crisis... And he knows Cheney, so I want to know how much he supports Cheney. It's a fair question (using your logic). And his involvement with Larry Craig. That would be nice to know as well.

Republican * National * Committee

Obama Should Come Clean On Ayers, Rezko And the Iraqi Billionaire - WSJ.com

You want us to play your game, but you refuse to play by the rules you have established... Typical.

bhkad · #27 (**permalink**) 09-01-2008, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saltwn

O.K., You sold me on that one.
See? If people would all just annunciate, I'd get the picture eventually!

Enunciate?

I'm just askin.

bhkad · #28 (**permalink**) 09-01-2008, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dabateman

You want us to play your game, but you refuse to play by the rules you have established... Typical.

I show respect to those who I feel deserve it and I play only by cnredd's rules here.

He is the Forum Deity here, silly.

cnredd · #29 (**permalink**) 09-01-2008, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhkad

I show respect to those who I feel deserve it and I play only by cnredd's rules here.

He is the Forum Deity here, silly.

No...on both points...

First, the easy one...I'm far from being a deity...I put my pants on one leg at a time (And I get it right AT LEAST 60% of the time)...

Second, I'm not to be played as a defense measure...It's wrong to tell others what you can and what you can't get away with based on me..."I'll push the line until I'm told I went too far." is a horible way to debate...

Third, my signature..."You get the respect that you give."...The error in your thinking is that you are NOT not giving respect based on what other members say to you...You are not giving them respect based on their POLITICAL IDEOLOGY!...That means that nomatter how nice you are being treated nor how well they argue a toipic, you will STILL not give respect...

That's a quick way to make no friends...

And since you follow my "rules" so closely, reread this...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Forum Rules

Be Sincere. Don't post just to get people riled up. Don't disrupt the purpose of the forums which is to foster genuine, and where possible, constructive dialogue between people of opposing ideologies.

dabateman · #30 (**permalink**) 09-01-2008, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhkad

I show respect to those who I feel deserve it and I play only by cnredd's rules here.

He is the Forum Deity here, silly.

So, instead of publishing well researched information like Cnredd generally does, you post innuendo and pray it flies... Interesting.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

The Following User Says Thank You to saltwn For This Useful Post:
bhkad

The Following User Says Thank You to cnredd For This Useful Post:
saltwn

The Following User Says Thank You to dabateman For This Useful Post:
foundit66