That is a platform for both parties and something both support. Unless you want to now say Democrats are anti-military, which your handbook says you are not allowed to say.

Oh come on. Stop with this nonsense. Republicans are not anti-gay. I may not believe in their overall stance on the issue, but I am not going to be deceitful and misleading by calling them "anti-gay." Big difference.

__________________

You keep dodging the issue I originally brought up. you dodge it by focusing on personally berating me.
It is a given Republicans blow their loudest horns for war and military might, always a new war on the horizon and don't talk much of peace especially lately when the constituency is so pro gun and anti Muslims.

Democrats on the other hand -look at history- have argued for peace and diplomacy while ending any war they must engage in as swiftly and decisively as possible.
All of the websites, news orgs and blogs plus the Republican people themselves are vocally pro military.
While in reality it is those who go to war with great reluctance who are usually wiser. Eisenhower is the modern exception of a reluctant wise Republican.
Why don't any of Romney's children serve? Didn't she and her spouse teach them the honor and responsibility that comes with being a Republican? Or is it just a fluke? That would have been a more valid question for Goldberg to ask.
Which of course was my original point and comment.

__________________
...

The OA didn't prevent the attack that killed the ambassador and 3 other Americans either. After 911 Bush didn't blame a video and trundle off to a fund raiser, he mobilized the Federal government to find out who was responsible directing the effort from the Presidency. Obama appointed a committee to do a report after the election naturally.