Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > General Forum > Open Discussion
Register FAQDonate PW Store PW Trivia Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Open Discussion Discuss How I explained Democrat Thinking, and offended two coworkers. at the General Forum; Originally Posted by sunwestdog . . . So are you saying we shouldn't pay taxes at all? Or that we ...

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2011, 03:40 PM
Oftencold's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,277
Thanks: 6,669
Thanked 6,253 Times in 4,073 Posts
Default Re: How I explained Democrat Thinking, and offended two coworkers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sunwestdog View Post
. . . So are you saying we shouldn't pay taxes at all? Or that we should only pay taxes on things we individually deem worthy of our tax dollars.
If I had my way, there would be a national sales tax, and no income tax. There would be absolutely no exceptions to the tax, and it would be the same percentage for all income levels. Then people culd support tax increases, but none to which they would be immune.

Aside from that, I'd get the Government out of the business of addressing most social problems.

Again, I think you could make the case that the wealthy should help the poor. But I'd forbid you to forgo your responsibility to make your case to them, and instead rob them at gunpoint.

It seems to me that it is the Left that feels that the case cannot be made, since they are so aroused by the concept of coercion.

You want me to help the poor? Then ask me, nicely, and accept that I do so voluntarily.

Oh, and if you can't afford to send money, then I expect you to labor for the poor, get your hands dirty, literally and figuratively.

And do you know, I think you'd soon discover that a rather large segment of the people you are so concerned over are in their predicaments through their own actions, and by their continuing failure to take corrective actions.
__________________
“Quod scripsi, scripsi"



"Sometimes, the source of the beautiful dawning light that drives back the darkness, is your house burning"


Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Oftencold For This Useful Post:
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2011, 03:43 PM
winston53660's Avatar
Scholar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,781
Thanks: 303
Thanked 913 Times in 639 Posts
Default Re: How I explained Democrat Thinking, and offended two coworkers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oftencold View Post
If I had my way, there would be a national sales tax, and no income tax. There would be absolutely no exceptions to the tax, and it would be the same percentage for all income levels. Then people culd support tax increases, but none to which they would be immune.
So you want the poor to disproportionately have there buying power lowered.

Regressive taxes suck.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2011, 03:49 PM
Oftencold's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,277
Thanks: 6,669
Thanked 6,253 Times in 4,073 Posts
Default Re: How I explained Democrat Thinking, and offended two coworkers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by winston53660 View Post
So you want the poor to disproportionately have there buying power lowered.

Regressive taxes suck.
I want them to escape poverty. that requires that they learn self disciple, understand the nature of taxation, grasp responsibility and above all that they live within a thriving economy.

Have you ever live among people who are largely immune from taxation and largely supported by one Government program or other? I have.

The effect is much like a wasting disease. Their sense of control is grossly eroded. And they see the country as belonging to others. After all, they know that they pay little into it.

And in truth an even tax is hardly regressive. It is the same for all citizens, as it should be. The rich man uses far less of the Government services that a poor man does, so the case could even be made that he should pay a lower tax rate.
__________________
“Quod scripsi, scripsi"



"Sometimes, the source of the beautiful dawning light that drives back the darkness, is your house burning"


Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2011, 03:55 PM
sunwestdog's Avatar
Ridin' the short bus
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Mizzou
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,715
Thanks: 638
Thanked 1,352 Times in 914 Posts
Default Re: How I explained Democrat Thinking, and offended two coworkers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oftencold View Post
If I had my way, there would be a national sales tax, and no income tax. There would be absolutely no exceptions to the tax, and it would be the same percentage for all income levels. Then people culd support tax increases, but none to which they would be immune.

Aside from that, I'd get the Government out of the business of addressing most social problems.

Again, I think you could make the case that the wealthy should help the poor. But I'd forbid you to forgo your responsibility to make your case to them, and instead rob them at gunpoint.

It seems to me that it is the Left that feels that the case cannot be made, since they are so aroused by the concept of coercion.

You want me to help the poor? Then ask me, nicely, and accept that I do so voluntarily.

Oh, and if you can't afford to send money, then I expect you to labor for the poor, get your hands dirty, literally and figuratively.

And do you know, I think you'd soon discover that a rather large segment of the people you are so concerned over are in their predicaments through their own actions, and by their continuing failure to take corrective actions.
I'd be all for that if I thought it would work. And I'm not a huge supporter of the present welfare system we have. The system we have is broke and does more to disable the poor than enable. A social safety net needs to be in place to help those who can't make it on their own. But the current system is bleeding money and not helping where it should in all cases. Keep the net. Just fix it.

Let me suggest one more government program we should put in place. An office that helps put together those in need with those willing to help. Just a thought.
__________________
As I grow older, I grow wiser. The wiser I become, the more I understand how little I know. sunwestdog
Life isn't fair. But people should be. sunwestdog
I reject your reality and substitute my own. Adam Savage
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sunwestdog For This Useful Post:
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2011, 04:12 PM
Infidel Dog's Avatar
The New Cool
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,684
Thanks: 734
Thanked 2,104 Times in 1,472 Posts
Default Re: How I explained Democrat Thinking, and offended two coworkers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sunwestdog View Post
Here's the inaccuracy of your example. You are implying that everyone should receive equal amounts no matter what their take. That's not what dems believe. This would be akin to saying that the nations wealthy should have to give away the vast majority of their wealth so that all Americans make the same amount. No one wants that.

What most of us believe is that if you have 12 fish, you should give 2 fish to the government. If you have 6 fish, you give 1. If you have 1 fish, you give none and maybe get a nibble off the successful fisherman's catch so you can feed your family. The guy with one fish is still hungry and poor, but can survive. The guy with 12 fish (now 10) is still rich and can afford all the luxuries life has to offer. That's a far cry from socialism or equal distribution of wealth.
True, there are degrees of left. The progressive, or the Obama position on the spectrum appears to suggest you start with what you're talking about, and little by little work your way to what Often Cold is talking about.

I think OC's example is acceptable, because the people he was talking to obviously didn't understand the direction they were heading with blanket acceptance of the Progressive path.

I think Progressive Democrat Maxine Waters put it best...

Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Infidel Dog For This Useful Post:
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2011, 04:16 PM
saltwn's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: in the natural state
Posts: 41,083
Thanks: 30,638
Thanked 16,967 Times in 11,510 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: How I explained Democrat Thinking, and offended two coworkers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oftencold View Post
You know it's a good day when two coworkers storm out of your office after you explain their own political philosophy to them in terms that strike near their hearts.

Both gentleman are in addition to the jobs they have here, commercial fishermen. I explained to them that the Democrat Approach would be to equalize their catch before they sell their fish.

That is, in the interests of fairness, since they both work approximately as hard on a fishing day, if one catches twelve fish, and another catches six, the one with the twelve owes the one with six three fish.

After I explained this they both stormed out of the room without another word to me.

I'd stay away from politics at work. You're lucky the fishermen had control enough to leave you to your folly.
__________________
...
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2011, 04:46 PM
treedancer's Avatar
Guide
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: St.Louis Mo.
Gender: Male
Posts: 355
Thanks: 65
Thanked 162 Times in 117 Posts
Default Re: How I explained Democrat Thinking, and offended two coworkers.

Quote:
QUOTE=texmaster;
ROFLOL You really do need to brush up on your history.
What history would that be?

Quote:
GE is Obama's best friend turning MSNBC into the Obama cheerleader's club during the election and in return received BILLIONS from the government for "clean energy" once Obama could give them the kickbacks.

I thought we were discussing taxes.


Quote:
Their CEO is on Obama's board for creating jobs.

What do you think GE should be paying in taxes?




Quote:
Too bad he's only lost jobs in this country for GE and grew them abroad.

Good for China or India?



Quote:
But thanks for the laugh

Thanks for the strawmen.
__________________
Virtually everything on Fox News is a bedtime story that only children could believe.

Alan Grayson
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2011, 06:01 PM
Oftencold's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,277
Thanks: 6,669
Thanked 6,253 Times in 4,073 Posts
Default Re: How I explained Democrat Thinking, and offended two coworkers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by saltwn View Post
I'd stay away from politics at work. You're lucky the fishermen had control enough to leave you to your folly.
What? You may think that you're staying away from politics at work, but remember that neither the government nor the many political movements in this country grant you that consideration.
they are always aware of you as part of their calculations.

And what is this folly? I thought it a rather elegant illustration.
__________________
“Quod scripsi, scripsi"



"Sometimes, the source of the beautiful dawning light that drives back the darkness, is your house burning"


Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2011, 06:52 PM
saltwn's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: in the natural state
Posts: 41,083
Thanks: 30,638
Thanked 16,967 Times in 11,510 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: How I explained Democrat Thinking, and offended two coworkers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oftencold View Post
What? You may think that you're staying away from politics at work, but remember that neither the government nor the many political movements in this country grant you that consideration.
they are always aware of you as part of their calculations.

And what is this folly? I thought it a rather elegant illustration.
The folly part comes in when jumping into such a sensitive subject (for some) as politics with people who are (assuming these are commercial fishermen) tough as nails and have a sort of freedom thing going on. They commit many petty crimes and hide out at sea or on foreign ports indefinitely. Even if they are bound to get caught this knowledge hives them a sort of "don't give a ****" attitude.
Why I like online debating is I don't have to put up with people shouting me down or retaliating.
__________________
...
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2011, 07:10 PM
Gordon Shumway's Avatar
can you sing tenor?
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northwest Ohio
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,559
Thanks: 1,645
Thanked 2,270 Times in 1,378 Posts
Default Re: How I explained Democrat Thinking, and offended two coworkers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oftencold View Post
You know it's a good day when two coworkers storm out of your office after you explain their own political philosophy to them in terms that strike near their hearts.

Both gentleman are in addition to the jobs they have here, commercial fishermen. I explained to them that the Democrat Approach would be to equalize their catch before they sell their fish.

That is, in the interests of fairness, since they both work approximately as hard on a fishing day, if one catches twelve fish, and another catches six, the one with the twelve owes the one with six three fish.

After I explained this they both stormed out of the room without another word to me.

you skipped several steps in this process making it sound like the "12 fish" fisherman is giving directly to the "6 fish" fisherman...not in a democrat's fantasy world...

the "6 fish" fisherman would pay 16% in federal income taxes so he'd have to send about 1 fish to the federal government (this exercise does not include state & local taxes --- well, because they'd be inferior anyway in the eyes of a democrat) while the "12 fish" fisherman would pay 33% (because the tax rates would have to be progressive) meaning he'd send roughly 4 fish to the feds so they could in turn redistribute that among those who didn't fish at all but not until they've taken their cut --- so of the 5 fish sent to the federal government maybe 2 or 3 would get to the folks in need of them while the remaining would be given as gifts to unions,trial lawyers & GE
in the end they'd still complain that the "12 fish" fisherman still had so much more than the "6 fish" fisherman & we'd have rallies demanding we take more of his fish because it's a national resource & belongs to all of us.
__________________
"Free people are not equal & equal people are not free." --- Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Gordon Shumway For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
and, coworkers, democrat, explained, how, offended, thinking, two

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0