
10-13-2011, 09:31 AM
|
|
Conservative Sage
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 5,849
Thanks: 1,926
Thanked 2,034 Times in 1,455 Posts
|
|
Re: Occupy Hand Signals
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oftencold
Perhaps, but the analogy is thin.
The American Revolution was something of an anomaly. The principles of the the Revolution did not include enfranchising the poor and uneducated, women and certainly not Indians and slaves.
It promoted the idea of transferring leadership from a distant, unconcerned ruling class, to a domestic, more sympathetic one.
We did not even begin with much of an idea of "all men being equal before the law," despite Mr. Jefferson's Declaration to the contrary.
In the Early republic, the idea of a ruling class of naturally superior men was a well established mode of thought. The idea of an empowered and enfranchised rabble was quite distasteful to the founders. The other great Republican Revolution of the period, in France, espoused the idea of "equality," which lead promptly to the Terror and thence to Napoleon.
America gradually, (but with amazing speed when compared with the general progress of social evolution throughout history,) developed the idea of an expanded franchise, but also worked to raise the sophistication and education of all social and economic classes. By this approach, we did not place automatic equal value upon the opinions of all men -- a patent absurdity, we provide almost all of our people with the tools needed to raise the value and quality of those opinions.
|
Minor point of difference, Jefferson never claimed the DoI contained new, innovative ideas. It was an aggregation of established ideas along with a coherent explanation of greivances against the Crown justifying severing their relationship with the King.
The contrast between the DoI and the OWS mob couldn't be more stark. The FF were willing to risk everything to shoulder the responsibility of being free. The OWS mob just wants another slice of government cheese to buy them off.
|