Quote:
Originally Posted by Researcher
Holy Moly. Do you read any of this?
In 2014, Shokin had investigated Burisma for money laundering and tax irregularities, per USA TODAY.
The probe focused on 2010-12, according to the National Anti-Corruption Bureau.
Hunter Biden — who joined the board in 2014 and served on it until early 2019 — was not the subject of the investigation.
|
Thanks for pointing out Hunter's activities at Burisma weren't investigated back in 2014. Requesting Hunter's activities at Burisma be investigated by the Ukrainians in 2019 is an impeachable offense. But Hunter Biden isn't above the law.
I'll quote myself in the hope repetition will result in understanding.
Quote:
The prosecutors activities at the time of his dismissal in no way mitigate Biden’s conflict of interest.
|
Yes or no, should the US official in charge of foreign policy in the Ukraine threaten to withhold all US aid? Is that a legitimate tool of diplomacy? Is bragging about coercing the Ukrainian government a sophisticated Biden foreign policy?
If as he claims Biden is able to rally US allies to follow his lead why didn't he use his "skills" to have an ally without a blatant conflict of interest press the Ukraine to dismiss the prosecutor? The answer is that would not have allowed Biden to parade around his inflated ego.

__________________
If Democrats were confident their nominee actually received more than 80 million votes they wouldn't have more troops occupying Washington, DC than Lincoln had defending the city during the Civil War. Not Joe Biden, Kim Jung Biden.