Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > General Forum > News & Current Events
Register FAQDonate PW Store PW Trivia Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

News & Current Events Discuss Jan. 6th Commitee hearing at the General Forum; Originally Posted by AZRWinger She is dead because she was shot for trespassing in the halls of the imperial Congress. ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2021, 03:07 PM
saltwn's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Esto perpetua
Posts: 88,753
Thanks: 57,365
Thanked 26,960 Times in 19,388 Posts
Send a message via AIM to saltwn Send a message via MSN to saltwn Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: Jan. 6th Commitee hearing

Quote:
Originally Posted by AZRWinger View Post
She is dead because she was shot for trespassing in the halls of the imperial Congress. She wasn't fighting with Praetorians. She didn’t even so much as break a window. Worse, a secret inquiry by the Biden regime commended the her executioner by keeping their name secret and refused to bring charges. It's open season on anyone deemed disloyal to Kim Jung Biden.

You are wrong about the police in riot gear. Even the edited video released by the regime shows they were in the background when the murderous assassin opened fire.

Elsewhere in the Capitol police held the doors open for the protesters and even acted as amicable tour guides. But that's not good enough for the bloodthirsty Marxist Democrats.
So. I see you watched Rome on some streaming channel. And I guess you're a fan boy now.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #82 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2021, 10:25 AM
Dog Man's Avatar
Down Boy!
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Southern Nevada
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,552
Thanks: 11,315
Thanked 9,473 Times in 6,244 Posts
Default Re: Jan. 6th Commitee hearing

Quote:
Originally Posted by AZRWinger View Post
She is dead because she was shot for trespassing in the halls of the imperial Congress. She wasn't fighting with Praetorians. She didn’t even so much as break a window. Worse, a secret inquiry by the Biden regime commended the her executioner by keeping their name secret and refused to bring charges. It's open season on anyone deemed disloyal to Kim Jung Biden.

You are wrong about the police in riot gear. Even the edited video released by the regime shows they were in the background when the murderous assassin opened fire.

Elsewhere in the Capitol police held the doors open for the protesters and even acted as amicable tour guides. But that's not good enough for the bloodthirsty Marxist Democrats.
https://www.westernjournal.com/ashli...233493ad3fef83

Yes, there were three SWAT officers behind her, and other Capital cops with the shooter, No one else was reacting and she was just hanging out with the rest of the people.

She was NOT engaged in any activity that would constitute her murder. She was not starting fires, or throwing Molotov cocktails at police like during the 2020 Riots.

From the story:
Shooting randomly into a crowd is reckless.

Roberts told Sperry he has several witnesses who were with Babbitt and did not hear the officer issue “any kind of warning.”

Roberts made the very compelling point that if Byrd had indeed issued a warning, why did no one react to it? His investigators, he told Sperry, had examined video which showed that none of the officers who were in the hallway with the shooter reacted before he pulled the trigger. He said none of them took cover or crouched or pulled their own guns as would have been expected had they heard a warning. Instead, he said that, just prior to the shooting, they’d been casually milling about in the lobby.

“Those other officers were within earshot. If he’s yelling, they certainly aren’t showing any reaction to it,” he said. “If he was giving any kind of warning, why didn’t they react?”

A veteran Capitol Police officer, who reportedly spoke to Sperry on the condition of anonymity, said, “I’m not sure how he was justified shooting her when there was a SWAT team right behind her. They saw no immediate threat.” Sperry explained the SWAT team consisted of “three heavily armed USCP officers who had positioned themselves between the doors and the mob.”

This is an issue that Republicans have brought up repeatedly. They would like to see members of the SWAT team testify before the House select committee. Arizona Rep. Paul Gosar said, “They were right next to her and saw no threat, certainly no lethal threat. Why were there no warnings given or escalation of command and force in proper law enforcement technique?”

"The fact is, Ashli Babbitt was NOT a threat."
__________________
Political Correctness, is Fascism masquerading as manners - George Carlin.

Last edited by Dog Man; 08-09-2021 at 10:32 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #83 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2021, 11:01 AM
Constant_Slothrop's Avatar
Scholar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,998
Thanks: 14
Thanked 652 Times in 587 Posts
Default Re: Jan. 6th Commitee hearing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dog Man View Post
https://www.westernjournal.com/ashli...233493ad3fef83

Yes, there were three SWAT officers behind her, and other Capital cops with the shooter, No one else was reacting and she was just hanging out with the rest of the people.

She was NOT engaged in any activity that would constitute her murder. She was not starting fires, or throwing Molotov cocktails at police like during the 2020 Riots.

From the story:
Shooting randomly into a crowd is reckless.

Roberts told Sperry he has several witnesses who were with Babbitt and did not hear the officer issue “any kind of warning.”

Roberts made the very compelling point that if Byrd had indeed issued a warning, why did no one react to it? His investigators, he told Sperry, had examined video which showed that none of the officers who were in the hallway with the shooter reacted before he pulled the trigger. He said none of them took cover or crouched or pulled their own guns as would have been expected had they heard a warning. Instead, he said that, just prior to the shooting, they’d been casually milling about in the lobby.

“Those other officers were within earshot. If he’s yelling, they certainly aren’t showing any reaction to it,” he said. “If he was giving any kind of warning, why didn’t they react?”

A veteran Capitol Police officer, who reportedly spoke to Sperry on the condition of anonymity, said, “I’m not sure how he was justified shooting her when there was a SWAT team right behind her. They saw no immediate threat.” Sperry explained the SWAT team consisted of “three heavily armed USCP officers who had positioned themselves between the doors and the mob.”

This is an issue that Republicans have brought up repeatedly. They would like to see members of the SWAT team testify before the House select committee. Arizona Rep. Paul Gosar said, “They were right next to her and saw no threat, certainly no lethal threat. Why were there no warnings given or escalation of command and force in proper law enforcement technique?”

"The fact is, Ashli Babbitt was NOT a threat."
Watch the video. The SWAT team was not right behind her. They were at the back of the mob. Several people among the mob saw the officer pull his gun and yelled warnings to the entire group that the guy had drawn his gun, and it was after that that Babbitt tried to climb through the broken window into the Speakers Lobby. She wasn't "just hanging out." She was trying to break into a secured area that was protected by an armed Capitol officer, who was charged with protecting the members of Congress and staff who were just off the lobby.
Reply With Quote
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2021, 11:25 AM
Dog Man's Avatar
Down Boy!
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Southern Nevada
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,552
Thanks: 11,315
Thanked 9,473 Times in 6,244 Posts
Default Re: Jan. 6th Commitee hearing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Constant_Slothrop View Post
Watch the video. The SWAT team was not right behind her. They were at the back of the mob. Several people among the mob saw the officer pull his gun and yelled warnings to the entire group that the guy had drawn his gun, and it was after that that Babbitt tried to climb through the broken window into the Speakers Lobby. She wasn't "just hanging out." She was trying to break into a secured area that was protected by an armed Capitol officer, who was charged with protecting the members of Congress and staff who were just off the lobby.
So according to you Counselor, Ashli was outside when he yelled a warning (which no one responded to) and after that, she climbed in the window, and he shot her. Please post the video you have, that backs that claim.
__________________
Political Correctness, is Fascism masquerading as manners - George Carlin.
Reply With Quote
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2021, 11:48 AM
Constant_Slothrop's Avatar
Scholar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,998
Thanks: 14
Thanked 652 Times in 587 Posts
Default Re: Jan. 6th Commitee hearing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dog Man View Post
So according to you Counselor, Ashli was outside when he yelled a warning (which no one responded to) and after that, she climbed in the window, and he shot her. Please post the video you have, that backs that claim.
She was standing right by the broken window in the door to the Speakers Lobby. The fact is that, even if she didn’t hear the officer, she sure as hell heard the other people shouting that the cop had drawn his weapon.

And she was in the hallway, not “outside.” Have you even bothered to watch the video of this?
Reply With Quote
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 08-10-2021, 09:52 AM
Dog Man's Avatar
Down Boy!
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Southern Nevada
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,552
Thanks: 11,315
Thanked 9,473 Times in 6,244 Posts
Default Re: Jan. 6th Commitee hearing

[QUOTE=Constant_Slothrop;1007326]She was standing right by the broken window in the door to the Speakers Lobby. The fact is that, even if she didn’t hear the officer, she sure as hell heard the other people shouting that the cop had drawn his weapon.

And she was in the hallway, not “outside.” Have you even bothered to watch the video of this?[/QUOTE]

I have only watched the approved version. Can you post the video you are
talking about?
__________________
Political Correctness, is Fascism masquerading as manners - George Carlin.
Reply With Quote
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2021, 10:16 PM
cnredd's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Gender: Male
Posts: 57,384
Thanks: 2,468
Thanked 39,661 Times in 21,998 Posts
Default Re: Jan. 6th Commitee hearing

Think the MSM will taut this anytime soon?...

Of course not...When the DoJ hides this stuff, the MSM wants to cuddle with them...

Jan 6 Prosecutors admit to possession of “images of officers hugging or fist-bumping rioters, posing for photos with rioters, and moving bike racks”

Quote:
Jan 6 Prosecutors admit to possession of “images of officers hugging or fist-bumping rioters, posing for photos with rioters, and moving bike racks”.

This week, federal prosecutors quietly revealed that they possess evidence that may sink their prosecutions of many of those who were present at the Capitol on January 6.

This under-the-radar admission was made in a filing in the case of United States v. Couy Griffin. Griffin – an elected county commissioner for Otero County, New Mexico, a former pastor, and the founder of “Cowboys for Trump” – is charged with entering a restricted area outside the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

On Jan. 6, Griffin and a videographer traveled to Washington, D.C. to protest the results of the 2020 Presidential Election. After attending the Stop the Steal rally at The Ellipse, Griffin headed toward the Capitol as the crowd formed around fencing which had been set up in anticipation of the presidential inauguration.

...The Department of Justice appears to have an double standard when it comes to enforcing 18 U.S.C. § 1752. Recall that hundreds of protesters “broke through Capitol Police barricades” before “storming” the Capitol Building and the Supreme Court during the Justice Kavanaugh confirmation hearings.

One photo from Roll Call shows some of those protesters standing in the same “restricted area” the government alleges Griffin “illegally entered.”
Yet none of these protesters was charged under 18 USC § 1752 despite the fact that Congress was disrupted when the protesters invaded the Capitol Building in the middle of the confirmation hearings. Instead, they were charged with D.C. Code §22-1307 – a local law that carries a maximum of 90 days in jail.


John Adams said that ours is a government of laws and not of men. Yet it becomes clearer every day that the opposite is true – the entrenched bureaucrats at the Department of Justice have one set of rules for those it views as enemies of Democrats and another for those they view as their political allies. And we know which category Couy Griffin falls into.

...After explaining that the government possesses “[t]housands of hours” of video footage from a variety of sources, they conceded these materials include recordings of Capitol Police Officers allowing protesters to enter the so-called “restricted” area into which Griffin is alleged to have trespassed.

The prosecutors stated:

Quote:
“[W]e are not in a position to turn over the universe of information we possess for Defendant to review. Although we are aware that we possess some information that the defense may view as supportive of arguments that law enforcement authorized defendants (including Defendant) to enter the restricted grounds, e.g., images of officers hugging or fist-bumping rioters, posing for photos with rioters, and moving bike racks, we are not in a position to state whether we have identified all such information”
__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cnredd For This Useful Post:
  #88 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2021, 06:51 AM
GetAClue's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Ohio
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,847
Thanks: 14,221
Thanked 10,550 Times in 6,041 Posts
Default Re: Jan. 6th Commitee hearing

Quote:
Originally Posted by cnredd View Post
Think the MSM will taut this anytime soon?...

Of course not...When the DoJ hides this stuff, the MSM wants to cuddle with them...

Jan 6 Prosecutors admit to possession of “images of officers hugging or fist-bumping rioters, posing for photos with rioters, and moving bike racks”
This and many other cases would be thrown out of court if a moral and impartial judge was hearing the case. The prosecution cannot withhold exculpatory evidence from the defense while prosecuting that same defendant.
__________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine

A lie doesn't become truth, a wrong doesn't become right, and Evil doesn't become good, just because it is accepted by the majority. - Booker T Washington
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GetAClue For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
6th, commitee, hearing, jan

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0