Over 100 Police Agencies PULL OUT Of Agreements To Guard DNC Convention - Page 2

saltwn · #11 (**permalink**) 07-29-2020, 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lumara

This is great! The Dems want to defund the police, so they can have their convention without police protection. That is only fair.

you really think democrats want to defund the police across the bored. how brainwashed of you.
haven't you heard people talking about sending police and a mental health person to deal with a mentally ill incident?
course not; you're too busy on fake news sites and programs and emails that hype you.

AZRWinger · #12 (**permalink**) 07-29-2020, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mellon_Collie

Probably were last year when they started planing, but now its probably more to do about nothing.

Well, if it's nothing to worry about then they shouldn't need any police presence at all. After all Democrats are the one true champions of the people.

Police agencies are understandably unhappy about being stripped of non lethal defensive measures leaving them with no options short of lethal force or leaving the violent mob in charge.

Consider that Rayshard Brooks in Atlanta might very well be alive today had the police been able to apply a chokehold to subdue him.

saltwn · #13 (**permalink**) 07-29-2020, 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AZRWinger

Well, if it's nothing to worry about then they shouldn't need any police presence at all. After all Democrats are the one true champions of the people.

Police agencies are understandably unhappy about being stripped of non lethal defensive measures leaving them with no options short of lethal force or leaving the violent mob in charge.

Consider that Rayshard Brooks in Atlanta might very well be alive today had the police been able to apply a chokehold to subdue him.

you forgot dc is gonna be virtual

Mellon_Collie · #14 (**permalink**) 07-29-2020, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AZRWinger

Well, if it's nothing to worry about then they shouldn't need any police presence at all. After all Democrats are the one true champions of the people.

Police agencies are understandably unhappy about being stripped of non lethal defensive measures leaving them with no options short of lethal force or leaving the violent mob in charge.

Consider that Rayshard Brooks in Atlanta might very well be alive today had the police been able to apply a chokehold to subdue him.

I normally avoid engaging you like the plague, but if your going to comment on me, at least read the rest of it so you have the full context.

Here let me help you...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mellon_Collie

You all do get that most of the convention is virtuale and held on-line, only about 300 people are expected to attend the in-person event.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manitou

So, those "security agreements" mentioned in the opening are nothing?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mellon_Collie

Probably were last year when they started planing, but now its probably more to do about nothing.

Now if your reading comprehension is sufficiently active, you will see I was commenting about it being an excuse to make a lot too do, since it is unlikely there will be need of the extra officer allowing them to make their point (regardless if I agree with it or not) without violating their oath, But then nuance has never been your strong suit.

AZRWinger · #15 (**permalink**) 07-30-2020, 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mellon_Collie

I normally avoid engaging you like the plague, but if your going to comment on me, at least read the rest of it so you have the full context.

Here let me help you...

Now if your reading comprehension is sufficiently active, you will see I was commenting about it being an excuse to make a lot too do, since it is unlikely there will be need of the extra officer allowing them to make their point (regardless if I agree with it or not) without violating their oath, But then nuance has never been your strong suit.

Oh ok, so you are dodging the issue of police being stripped of nonlethal force options because there will only be around 300 present at the DNC convention. Brilliant.

Are you going to address the issue of Democrats insisting police either shoot or retreat? Or, are your comprehension skills not engaged?

Dog Man · #16 (**permalink**) 07-30-2020, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mellon_Collie

You all do get that most of the convention is virtuale and held on-line, only about 300 people are expected to attend the in-person event.

So the rioters may end up outnumbering the attendees.

I'm starting to believe the Democrats are taking away non-lethal means of stopping riots in the hope that a cop will be forced to actually shoot someone.

We all know they would LOVE to use that against Trump and the Cops.

Jeerleader · #17 (**permalink**) 07-30-2020, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lumara

This is great! The Dems want to defund the police, so they can have their convention without police protection. That is only fair.

The most hilarious part of this karma overflowing story (according to AP reporting) is that the Milwaukee top cop is considering asking for "federal assistance" to secure the Democrat convention.

I hope police agencies all withdraw mutual support and, in all that is good and proper, the DNC should receive a short "we have more pressing needs than protecting those who detest us, sorry, not sorry" . . . from AG Barr.

Let those despicable, disgusting Democrats stew in the warm Molotovey embrace of their constituents.

.

Manitou · #18 (**permalink**) 07-30-2020, 01:17 PM

Away from the subject, I wonder when scientists are going to develop safe, effective sleeping gas to use against rioters. Heck, I'd settle for laughing gas. Or maybe fart gas, like in that weapon in DESPICABLE ME.

Mellon_Collie · #19 (**permalink**) 07-30-2020, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AZRWinger

Oh ok, so you are dodging the issue of police being stripped of nonlethal force options because there will only be around 300 present at the DNC convention. Brilliant.

Are you going to address the issue of Democrats insisting police either shoot or retreat? Or, are your comprehension skills not engaged?

No I am just not letting your angry little troll brain twist my words nor placate your fantasy world where all Democrats are marched off to the gas chamber.

Mellon_Collie · #20 (**permalink**) 07-30-2020, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dog Man

So the rioters may end up outnumbering the attendees.

I'm starting to believe the Democrats are taking away non-lethal means of stopping riots in the hope that a cop will be forced to actually shoot someone.

We all know they would LOVE to use that against Trump and the Cops.

What else do you see in the future oh Carnac the Magnificent

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

The Following User Says Thank You to Mellon_Collie For This Useful Post:
saltwn

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dog Man For This Useful Post:
FrancSevin, GetAClue, Lumara

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jeerleader For This Useful Post:
Dog Man, GetAClue, Lumara