Snopes - not worth the powder to blow it up.

__________________
The Democrats are not after the truth, they are after the President.

https://www.factcheck.org/2018/03/me...ed-snopes-com/

In my opinion Snopes IS very liberally biased. But when you use misinformation to make that point, it weakens your argument rather than strengthens it.

Snopes and Soros go together like shlt and stink. I see no misinformation anywhere.

I'm sorry. I mean Snopes, Soros, and Facebook go together like shlt, stink and loud farts.

The misinformation is:

1. Factcheck.org exposed them. They didn't. Maybe they should have, but they didn't.
2. The people in the photos are in any way related to snopes. They aren't.
3. That snopes doesn't have any employees. They do.

Yes, Snopes is very liberally biased. I agree with that 100%. I don't know if they have any connection to Soros or not. It's certainly possible.

However, spreading misinformation in this way, weakens the argument the OP is trying to make. If you refuse to see that, then you are letting your own bias dictate what you believe instead of critical thought.

So that really isn't a picture of the Snopes guy?

They probably didn't have any employees for quite some time after they began.

All I care about is the Soros-Snopes connection.

https://www.owler.com/company/snopes

__________________
The Democrats are not after the truth, they are after the President.

No, they aren't even the same guy in both pictures. Neither of them is Mickleson, the CEO of snopes...

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/F..._NY_Bajnai.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/F...drew_Baron.jpg

When it snopes first started it was just Mickleson and his wife Barbara. Back then though, they didn't do all the political fact checking they do now. They pretty much stuck to urban legends and it was much better.

Mickleson and his wife have been divorced for some time. Barbara sold her shares in snopes (which ended up being used as part of a take over attempt) and they have 15 employees.

I have no idea if there is any connection with Soros or not. I'm not aware of one.

No critical thought is needed to place those three entities into a benjo ditch, and MY information (opinion, if anybody wishes) is what I am referring to. Like I said, those three entities go together like shlt, stink, and loud farts.; Soros, for one, is one level below maggot snot.

Oh I agree...

I was only referring to this statement, "I see no misinformation anywhere."

Factcheck.org did NOT expose them, the people in the picture are NOT the CEO of Snopes, and Snopes does have employees.

Claims to the contrary ARE misinformation.

My whole point is that using misinformation to make the argument that Snopes is liberally biased weakens the argument.

Which IS unfortunate, because Snopes IS VERY liberally biased.

This story about Snopes and Soros is not true, I checked Snopes and they said so.

__________________
"The freedom of speech is, in sum, our foremost protection against tyranny. Without it, a tyrant can work his will without any fear of his opponents uttering even one cross word."

Snoops is 100% more accurate than King Donald's daily Tweets.....



A picture of a hand shake goes a long way with close minded folks, indeed...

Typical right wing propaganda, they know their ilk.....