https://www.breitbart.com/crime/2019...tormy-daniels/

Another big nothingburger.

__________________
The Democrats are not after the truth, they are after the President.

I still don't understand how people wanted Trump "arrested" or "impeached" over a possible campaign violation with a value of less than $200,000 when Obama was found guilty of campaign violations so massive that the Obama Campaign was fined OVER TWICE AS MUCH for campaign violations equaling NINE TIMES AS MUCH...

Obama 2008 campaign fined $375,000

Trump MIGHT HAVE misrepresented ONE transaction with contributions?....He should be arrested and impeached...

Obama does the same with THIRTEEN HUNDRED transactions?...Well, that's not even a "free pass"...That a "MESSIAH pass"...Remember...When it's a Democrat, it's "different"...

__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd

Yeah, but Obama's the devil incarnate according to right wing brainwashing. We should maybe expect better of Trump, who was going to drain the swamp, instead of bringing the swamp creatures with him.

Thanks for confirming the double standard.

__________________
If Democrats were confident their nominee actually received more than 80 million votes they wouldn't have more troops occupying Washington, DC than Lincoln had defending the city during the Civil War. Not Joe Biden, Kim Jung Biden.

What's the double standard? Obama's record is as pure as the driven in comparison to Trump's. Republican are continuously corrupt going back to Nixon.

Double standard? Based on your comments, you don't seem to have one. Just a one sided intractable view the result of a closed mind. The word you are looking for is "Biased"

__________________
I am going to hang a Batman Costume in my closet. .......... Just to screw with myself when I get alzheimer's.
sola gratia, sola fide, sola scriptura.

I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN, I AM A FREEMAN, THE DEMOCRATS WORST NIGHTMARE

Jerry Nadler asks Hope Hicks to clarify her “inconsistent” testimony about hush payments

Trump knew about efforts to quash stories of alleged affairs, court records show

FBI warrants show Trump's close involvement in hush money effort


Trump probably won't be charged with campaign finance fraud in office. But that doesn't make him innocent.

__________________

Of course it was "hush money" and yes, even a "cover up" but the question is, was a campaign finance crime committed? That is answered (under normal circumstances) by asking, would the hush money be paid and other actions taken, even if the person paying the hush money wasn't a candidate for office?

A "hush money" payment from personal accounts (not campaign accounts) to "cover-up" something non-criminal in and of itself, to protect personal interests, isn't criminal (again under normal circumstances, not special Nadler Rules for Donald Trump).

So, regardless of how Cohen or anyone else characterized the actions, Cohen's testimony destroyed the idea that either paying for Pecker to "catch and kill" stories, or hush money bimbo payoffs that occurred when Trump was a candidate were in fact crimes.

Cohen testified that both actions, the purposeful catching and killing of stories with / by Pecker, and various and assorted bimbo payoffs when they erupted, predated his employment with Trump.

If that is true, then the instances of catch and kill and bimbo payoffs in 2016 were just NOP for Trump, either as a private citizen or candidate, thus could not be -- as the law defines the crime -- "campaign finance violations" . . .

So it seems, Cohen plead guilty to non-crimes, . . . thanks Lanny Davis (HRC's lawyer)!

__________________

Like I said, a big, fat nothingburger

__________________
The Democrats are not after the truth, they are after the President.

Were you living abroad during the Clinton Administration? And who is the "Driven"? And who says he was pure?

__________________
"The freedom of speech is, in sum, our foremost protection against tyranny. Without it, a tyrant can work his will without any fear of his opponents uttering even one cross word."