Political Wrinkles

Political Wrinkles (http://www.politicalwrinkles.com/)
-   News & Current Events (http://www.politicalwrinkles.com/news-current-events/)
-   -   It Begins,,,; DOJ to re-open clinton E'mail Scndal (http://www.politicalwrinkles.com/news-current-events/53987-begins-doj-re-open-clinton-email-scndal.html)

FrancSevin 01-04-2018 03:55 PM

It Begins,,,; DOJ to re-open Clinton E'mail Scndal
 
I expect this to end with no one charged but,,,;
IT BEGINS=> DOJ Reopens Hillary Clinton Email Investigation

Perhaps, at the very least, the truth will see the light of day.

foundit66 01-04-2018 05:52 PM

Re: It Begins,,,; DOJ to re-open clinton E'mail Scndal
 
When will people learn to stop following the meaningless click-bait garbage?

"Gateway Pundit" references a "Daily Beast" article.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/justic...s-emails-again

Looking at the article, they refuse to name any source. :rolls
And when they go for official comment:
A spokesperson for the Justice Department declined to comment for this story.
:rolls

On a more real level, can Repubs actually pick a side on this issue?
Or is this just an obvious eternal distraction to be employed when Trump supporters find it convenient?

First they are chanting (before the election) that Hillary should be locked up.
Trump gets elected and says he has no such interest. Repubs follow suit.
Trump says he's not interested in pursuing case against Clinton

Now, supposedly, they want an investigation again?
Over a year later, they want to start up what has already been put to bed?
:rolls

FrancSevin 01-04-2018 07:54 PM

Re: It Begins,,,; DOJ to re-open clinton E'mail Scndal
 
I had never been particularly enamoured with Bannon. Or Trump in the campaigns. But Trump was the better of the two candidates in the final run. And he has been a surprisingly good Executive so far.

Bannon, on the other hand has lost all luster and now he is losing any credibility. Even Brieghtbart is looking at separation from him. He will be lucky to end up a footnote of a footnote in history. His wounds are self inflicted and will likely prove mortal.

treedancer 01-04-2018 08:15 PM

Re: It Begins,,,; DOJ to re-open Clinton E'mail Scndal
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by FrancSevin (Post 924333)
I expect this to end with no one charged but,,,;
IT BEGINS=> DOJ Reopens Hillary Clinton Email Investigation

Perhaps, at the very least, the truth will see the light of day.

:yawn When you have a name fer "An ally of Attorney General Jeff Sessions" get back to me.:wave

FrancSevin 01-05-2018 10:32 AM

Re: It Begins,,,; DOJ to re-open Clinton E'mail Scndal
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by treedancer (Post 924358)
:yawn When you have a name fer "An ally of Attorney General Jeff Sessions" get back to me.:wave

I mentioned no such person. Why do I have to come up with a name for a nemesis you invented?

BTW, Jeff Sessions doesn't need an ally. What he needs is a pair of balls.

foundit66 01-05-2018 10:47 AM

Re: It Begins,,,; DOJ to re-open Clinton E'mail Scndal
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by FrancSevin (Post 924391)
I mentioned no such person. Why do I have to come up with a name for a nemesis you invented?

:rolls

You are really so quick to believe what is convenient you don't even look at the situation...

"Gateway Pundit" references a "Daily Beast" article.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/justic...er&via=desktop

Looking at the article, they refuse to name any source.
What treedancer is referencing is the absurd description Daily Beast gave for their anonymous source. The one the validity of this article hinges on...
An ally of Attorney General Jeff Sessions who is familiar with the thinking at the Justice Department’s Washington headquarters ...
:rolls

So to repeat treedancer's assessment: "When you have a name fer "An ally of Attorney General Jeff Sessions" get back to me."

Dog Man 01-05-2018 11:28 AM

Re: It Begins,,,; DOJ to re-open clinton E'mail Scndal
 
I heard that quite a bit of possible evidence burned up in the recent fire at the Clintons.

I'm sure it's just a coincidence. ;)

Dog Man 01-05-2018 11:32 AM

Re: It Begins,,,; DOJ to re-open Clinton E'mail Scndal
 
[QUOTE=foundit66;924393]:rolls


Looking at the article, they refuse to name any source.
What treedancer is referencing is the absurd description Daily Beast gave for their anonymous source.

So are you saying that you don't believe anonymous sources? I guess turn about is not fair play huh?

foundit66 01-05-2018 12:05 PM

Re: It Begins,,,; DOJ to re-open clinton E'mail Scndal
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dog Man (Post 924397)
I heard that quite a bit of possible evidence burned up in the recent fire at the Clintons.
I'm sure it's just a coincidence.

I find no coincidence in people making up stories to suit their agendas... :rolls


Quote:

Originally Posted by Dog Man
So are you saying that you don't believe anonymous sources? I guess turn about is not fair play huh?

Would you care to document what you're talking about in reference to me?
Or is this just another example of somebody making up a statement to suit their agenda...

Never mind. I already know the answer... :rolls
Cause the real solution to this would be to demand intellectual honesty on both sides. Not to use it as a ploy to try to justify bad behavior.

I heard somewhere that the right was all about personal responsibility. I don't find that to be true as too many throw out the "but the other guy ..." excuses.

FrancSevin 01-05-2018 12:52 PM

Re: It Begins,,,; DOJ to re-open Clinton E'mail Scndal
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foundit66 (Post 924393)
:rolls

You are really so quick to believe what is convenient you don't even look at the situation...

"Gateway Pundit" references a "Daily Beast" article.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/justic...er&via=desktop

Looking at the article, they refuse to name any source.
What treedancer is referencing is the absurd description Daily Beast gave for their anonymous source. The one the validity of this article hinges on...
An ally of Attorney General Jeff Sessions who is familiar with the thinking at the Justice Department’s Washington headquarters ...
:rolls

So to repeat treedancer's assessment: "When you have a name fer "An ally of Attorney General Jeff Sessions" get back to me."

Apparently you assigned your own meanings to what I said so you could criticize.

Are you that desperate for confrontations?.

This dishonesty of yours, makes you no fun at all to play with,,,; it is why I refrain from interactions with you.

Again I ask,,; Why do I have to look for one? And "AG" Sessions shouldn't need one. He is the boss at the DOJ. What he needs are Balls.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0