This is funny, almost all news coming out of the NYT's WaPo, and other liberal news organizations use anonymous sources and you liberals eat it up like it is fact, but you do not give the same credibility when it comes to conservative sites.

can anyone say HYPOCRITES!

__________________
Sometimes by losing a battle you find a new way to win the war.

Donald Trump

Remember the outpouring of joy among Trump haters and their media stogies over the Brian Ross story that General Flynn was going to testify there was collusion with the Russians in the Trump campaign? How about Buzz Feed publishing the dirty dossier with their editor proclaiming it is up to the public to decide its veracity?

The pious claims of not believing anonymous sources personally are meaningless compared to the rabid hatred in the media for Trump that inflates every imagined scandal into grounds for a treason trial. Brian Ross returns to work at a news organization so unconcerned with accurate reporting they haven't changed their verification process to prevent future errors.

But it's all good because you claim not to trust anonymous sources personally.

__________________
If Democrats were confident their nominee actually received more than 80 million votes they wouldn't have more troops occupying Washington, DC than Lincoln had defending the city during the Civil War. Not Joe Biden, Kim Jung Biden.

Actually, I believed the "story" was out that a new investigation was beginning when I posted the OP, nothing more than that.

But, you cannot help your self. So you again imply what you think I believe so you can comment on it. But your comments sparked three pages of discussion, little of which is about the topic,,,; or it's validity.

Brilliant

__________________
I am going to hang a Batman Costume in my closet. .......... Just to screw with myself when I get alzheimer's.
sola gratia, sola fide, sola scriptura.

I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN, I AM A FREEMAN, THE DEMOCRATS WORST NIGHTMARE

Yes, surely wicked Hillary and her Corrupt Administration will finally be taken down this time! Am i right guys!

And what do you think now?
About 3 and a half months later, absolutely nothing seen...

Do you still believe that investigation "was beginning"?




You think that right-wingers wanting to obfuscate and ignore a discussion on validity somehow means something?
The only thing it means is that there are too many right-wingers wanting to obfuscate and ignore a discussion on validity...

__________________
“Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.”
~Abraham Lincoln

It's kind of funny, but you could substitute Trump Russia scandal for Hillary email scandal and come to the same conclusion. Although we all know that Hillary did destroy 1,000's of emails, some of which were classified. But since Comey said she didn't intend any harm, ( before he talked to her ) she got off scott free.

So the difference is, Hillary is above the law, and they are convicting Trump of different things everyday in the court of public opinion, because they have nothing to convict him in an actual court of law.

n case you missed Redd's post on the other thread

First, government information was delivered to persons NOT "in trust"...Both Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills do not have the same security clearances as the Secretary of State, yet had access to Clinton's server...HIGHLY illegal...

Second, the fact that at least two parties knew (Three that we know of, actually) that this government information was being stored NOT in its "proper place of custody" constitute a conspiracy, which is illegal under section (g)...

Third, "gross negligence" is prosecutable..."Intent" is NOT the only reason for prosecution...

"Let the games begin"

If the story were true, we all know damn well Trump would have at least five or six tweet rant about it. He's not one for subtlety.

__________________
"I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side." - Donald Trump, on pedophile Jeff Epstein.

No. You really couldn't.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ion/906920001/


And George Bush was guilty of war crimes.
But none of that is relevant to the actual point that this is fake news.


And you guys weren't convicting Hillary in a court of public opinion???



That's the whole point.
The games are already over.
You guys keep dragging up this crap because you want to ignore what's going on with Trump...




Some of these threads simply devolve into people wanting to troll. I think many on the right knew this was a b.s. story, but wanted to push it anyways.
Cuz Hillary...

Bu-bu-bu-BUSH was the common refrain to mentioning anything about the past while Obama was in office.
With Trump in office, the past is a recurring story line.

__________________
“Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.”
~Abraham Lincoln

Finally it looks like justice will be served:

__________________
Quarantine restricts the sick. Tyranny restricts the healthy.

Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives. - Ronald Reagan