Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > General Forum > News & Current Events
Register FAQDonate PW Store PW Trivia Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

News & Current Events Discuss Supreme Court won’t review decision that found N.C. voting law discriminates against at the General Forum; WOW! This is quite a surprise.I guess the right-wingers/small r's are going to do governing instead of against everything.AT least ...

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2017, 01:56 PM
treedancer's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: St.Louis Mo.
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,981
Thanks: 938
Thanked 1,546 Times in 1,246 Posts
Default Supreme Court won’t review decision that found N.C. voting law discriminates against

WOW! This is quite a surprise.I guess the right-wingers/small r's are going to do governing instead of against everything.AT least in N.C.

<The Supreme Court will not consider reinstating North Carolina’s 2013 voting law that a lower court ruled discriminated against African American voters, the justices said Monday.>

<A unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit had found in 2016 that North Carolina legislators had acted “with almost surgical precision” to blunt the influence of African American voters.>

<Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. took pains to note that the court’s decision did not reach the merits of the case, but Democrats, civil rights groups and minority groups celebrated the demise of the law. It was one of numerous voting rights changes passed by Republican-led legislatures in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision striking down a key section of the Voting Rights Act that effectively removed federal oversight of states with a history of discrimination.>

"Patriotism is the exact opposite of nationalism. Nationalism is a betrayal of patriotism. By putting our own interests first, with no regard for others, we erase the very thing that a nation holds dearest, and the thing that keeps it alive: its moral values."
French President Emmanuel Macron
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to treedancer For This Useful Post:
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2017, 08:46 AM
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Okolona
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,220
Thanks: 1,645
Thanked 609 Times in 522 Posts
Red face Re: Supreme Court won’t review decision that found N.C. voting law discriminates agai

SCOTUS scuppers NC voter ID law...

U.S. Supreme Court Effectively Kills N.C.’s Voter ID Law
May 15, 2017 | Liberal activists are celebrating the end of North Carolina's 2013 election law, which required photo ID at the polls; eliminated same-day voter registration; and reduced the state’s early-voting period by one week.
On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review a federal appeals court decision that found North Carolina’s election law discriminated against African-Americans. The Supreme Court refusal means North Carolina has exhausted all its appeals, and the 2016 ruling by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals stands. “This law, enacted with what the appeals court called discriminatory intent and ‘almost surgical precision’ targeting African-American voters, is meeting its much-deserved demise,” said Dale Ho, director of the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project. “An ugly chapter in voter suppression is finally closing.” “We are grateful that the Supreme Court has decided to allow the Fourth Circuit’s ruling to stand, confirming that discrimination has no place in our democracy and elections,” said Allison Riggs, senior staff attorney with the Southern Coalition for Social Justice. “This ruling sends a strong message that lawmakers in North Carolina should stop enacting laws that discriminate based on race.”

The Democrat National Committee cheered the end of what it called a “racist” law. “That’s why we’re creating a voter protection and empowerment unit at the DNC to stand up and resist the ongoing assault on the right to vote from Trump and the GOP,” Chairman Tom Perez said in a statement on Monday. “We can’t trust Trump, Jeff Sessions, or anyone in this administration to protect access to the ballot box. Today, democracy triumphed over discrimination.” Last year, when a three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the election law, Republican leaders of the North Carolina Legislature wrote: “Since today’s decision by three partisan Democrats ignores legal precedent, ignores the fact that other federal courts have used North Carolina's law as a model, and ignores the fact that a majority of other states have similar protections in place, we can only wonder if the intent is to reopen the door for voter fraud, potentially allowing fellow Democrat politicians like Hillary Clinton and Roy Cooper to steal the election.”

Senate Leader Phil Berger (R-Rockingham) and House Speaker Tim Moore (R-Cleveland) also said the voter ID law would have ensured that any North Carolina citizen who wants to vote would have that opportunity. The law would have established a list of valid government-issued photo IDs that voters could present at their polling places; allowed anyone without a photo ID to obtain one at no cost through the Department of Motor Vehicles; and allowed anyone who still had difficulty obtaining a valid ID to fill out a reasonable impediment affidavit and still have their vote counted. It also would have aligned North Carolina with other states on matters of same-day registration and out-of-precinct voting. “More than 30 other states have voter ID requirements, and a similar law was upheld by the United States Supreme Court in 2008,” Berger and Moore noted last July.

They also said opponents of the law “failed to produce a single witness who would be unable to vote under the law in court.” President Trump carried North Carolina in the November election, getting around 50 percent of the vote to Hillary Clinton’s 46 percent.

U.S. Supreme Court Effectively Kills N.C.?s Voter ID Law
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2017, 09:02 AM
FrancSevin's Avatar
Runs with scissors
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: St Louis MO
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,551
Thanks: 9,918
Thanked 13,386 Times in 7,327 Posts
Default Re: Supreme Court won’t review decision that found N.C. voting law discriminates agai

The SCOTUS rejected a consideration of the case, not on a point of the law but because there is a question of standing. The Governor retracted to appeal, but the AG of NC attempted to go forward.

"Chief Justice John Roberts said the political situation created uncertainty over who is authorized to seek review of the lower court ruling."

The SCOTUS ruling gives no credence whatsoever to argument from either side of the case.
I am going to hang a Batman Costume in my closet. .......... Just to screw with myself when I get alzheimer's.
sola gratia, sola fide, sola scriptura.


Last edited by FrancSevin; 05-17-2017 at 09:12 AM..
Reply With Quote

against, court, decision, discriminates, found, law, review, supreme, that, voting, won’t

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0