One organizer of ‘A Day Without a Woman’ is a convicted terrorist - Page 3

AZRWinger · #21 (**permalink**) 02-27-2017, 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShivaTD

1995 THEN - VETTING PROCESSES NOT SO GOOD

2001 - INTERNATIONAL FOREIGN TERRORIST ATTACK ON US SOIL BY FOREIGNERS (Mostly Saudis) WITH VISAS.

2002-2016 HUGE IMPROVEMENTS IN OUR VISA AND IMMIGRANT VETTING PROCESS MADE BY THE BUSH AND OBAMA ADMINISTRATIONS.

2002-2016 - NO INTERNATIONAL TERRORIST ATTACKS ON US SOIL BECAUSE OF EXCELLENT IMPROVEMENTS IN VISA AND IMMIGRANT VETTING PROCESSES BY TWO SUCCESSIVE ADMINISTRATIONS.

2017 NOW - VETTING PROCESSES FOR BOTH VISAS AND IMMIGRANTS IS EXCEPTIONALLY GOOD

I'm beginning to wonder of some Republicans can even read a calendar when they can't tell the difference between what happened 20 years ago and what's going on today.

The female San Bernardino terrorist shooter had a spousal status without giving a valid address back home or having her social media entries reviewed. My, what wonderful vetting. No need to wonder if Leftists can read simple facts, they cannot.

saltwn · #22 (**permalink**) 02-27-2017, 07:34 PM

So this gal isn't leading any march. I think it's several people who are just average voters

Hairy Jello · #23 (**permalink**) 02-27-2017, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbo

If you lie about your past in order to become a citizen, why are you not in jail instead of organizing marches?

I'm more stunned libs are defending this terrorist pig.

Then again I'm not that stunned.

ShivaTD · #24 (**permalink**) 03-03-2017, 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbo

You just gotta love that allegedly word when justifying the actions of a terrorist.

I don't have any information confirming that she's a terrorist. All we have is a conviction by a prejudicial Israeli military court that denies "due process of the law" to Palestinians Arabs and that her attorney claims her confession was secured a by acts of torture.

I do not nor could I ever be convinced to support acts of terrorism against a civilian population but if there was ever an argument to be considered that would rationalize acts of terrorism against a civilian population it would be the brutal and tyrannical oppression of the Palestinian Arabs by the Israeli government. I will continue to condemn acts of terrorism against any civilian population but.... I will never condemn the attacks against the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) by the Palestinian Arabs. The IDF is a legitimate military enemy of the Palestinian Arabs because it's the official organization of tyranny employed by the Israeli government.

The brutal tyranny of Israel over the Palestinian Arabs must be ended. The Palestinian Arabs have a "Right to Exist" in their own nation of Palestine and Israel, a government with no sovereign territory of it's own, is violating the Right to Exist for the Palestinian Arabs.

There's only one solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict and that is for the UN Security Council to authorize military force (US lead NATO forces) to impose the conditions of UNGA Resolution 181 where Jerusalem is established as an international city and the balance of all the remaining territory of Palestine (as established when Transjordan was separated under the British Mandatory) is divided as equally as pragmatically possible based upon the mutual consent of the Palestinian Arabs and the Palestinian (Israeli) Jews.

The tyranny of Israel has existed for far too long and must come to an end.

jimbo · #25 (**permalink**) 03-03-2017, 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShivaTD

I don't have any information confirming that she's a terrorist. All we have is a conviction by a prejudicial Israeli military court that denies "due process of the law" to Palestinians Arabs and that her attorney claims her confession was secured a by acts of torture.

I do not nor could I ever be convinced to support acts of terrorism against a civilian population but if there was ever an argument to be considered that would rationalize acts of terrorism against a civilian population it would be the brutal and tyrannical oppression of the Palestinian Arabs by the Israeli government. I will continue to condemn acts of terrorism against any civilian population but.... I will never condemn the attacks against the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) by the Palestinian Arabs. The IDF is a legitimate military enemy of the Palestinian Arabs because it's the official organization of tyranny employed by the Israeli government.

The brutal tyranny of Israel over the Palestinian Arabs must be ended. The Palestinian Arabs have a "Right to Exist" in their own nation of Palestine and Israel, a government with no sovereign territory of it's own, is violating the Right to Exist for the Palestinian Arabs.

There's only one solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict and that is for the UN Security Council to authorize military force (US lead NATO forces) to impose the conditions of UNGA Resolution 181 where Jerusalem is established as an international city and the balance of all the remaining territory of Palestine (as established when Transjordan was separated under the British Mandatory) is divided as equally as pragmatically possible based upon the mutual consent of the Palestinian Arabs and the Palestinian (Israeli) Jews.

The tyranny of Israel has existed for far too long and must come to an end.

So change allegedly to claims if you prefer. I guess that makes it all better.

The rest of your rant against Israel is just opinion.

The Arabs, given the choice and opportunity, would continue the total eradication of Jews started in the '30's by another tyrant. Their actions and words prove this.

That's another opinion.

zoriolus · #26 (**permalink**) 03-03-2017, 09:09 AM

[QUOTE=ShivaTD;875522]I don't have any information confirming that she's a terrorist. All we have is a conviction by a prejudicial Israeli military court that denies "due process of the law" to Palestinians Arabs and that her attorney claims her confession was secured a by acts of torture.
[QUOTE]

There was no evidence of torture or mistreatment. The trial was monitored by International Red Cross who said it was fair and that the defendant was given every opportunity to make a defense. It wasn't a "kangaroo court". The investigators found explosive bricks and associated bomb components in Rasmea's room and house. There was physical evidence, witnesses, and her own confession within 3 days after her arrest. She was a ringleader, not an innocent victim.

Rasmieh Rasmea Yousef Odeh | Trial | Conviction | Sentence

Pretty Flamingo · #27 (**permalink**) 03-03-2017, 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShivaTD

I don't have any information confirming that she's a terrorist. All we have is a conviction by a prejudicial Israeli military court that denies "due process of the law" to Palestinians Arabs and that her attorney claims her confession was secured a by acts of torture.

I do not nor could I ever be convinced to support acts of terrorism against a civilian population but if there was ever an argument to be considered that would rationalize acts of terrorism against a civilian population it would be the brutal and tyrannical oppression of the Palestinian Arabs by the Israeli government. I will continue to condemn acts of terrorism against any civilian population but.... I will never condemn the attacks against the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) by the Palestinian Arabs. The IDF is a legitimate military enemy of the Palestinian Arabs because it's the official organization of tyranny employed by the Israeli government.

The brutal tyranny of Israel over the Palestinian Arabs must be ended. The Palestinian Arabs have a "Right to Exist" in their own nation of Palestine and Israel, a government with no sovereign territory of it's own, is violating the Right to Exist for the Palestinian Arabs.

There's only one solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict and that is for the UN Security Council to authorize military force (US lead NATO forces) to impose the conditions of UNGA Resolution 181 where Jerusalem is established as an international city and the balance of all the remaining territory of Palestine (as established when Transjordan was separated under the British Mandatory) is divided as equally as pragmatically possible based upon the mutual consent of the Palestinian Arabs and the Palestinian (Israeli) Jews.

The tyranny of Israel has existed for far too long and must come to an end.

Hey Shivva - defend this bitch.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmea_Odeh

.

Pretty Flamingo · #28 (**permalink**) 03-03-2017, 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbo

So change allegedly to claims if you prefer. I guess that makes it all better.

The rest of your rant against Israel is just opinion.

The Arabs, given the choice and opportunity, would continue the total eradication of Jews started in the '30's by another tyrant. Their actions and words prove this.

That's another opinion.

You have to excuse Shivva. He admits to overthinking; however it has warped his knowledge of facts and history. Just ignore his ramblings.

.

CindyB · #29 (**permalink**) 03-03-2017, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbo

You just gotta love that allegedly word when justifying the actions of a terrorist.

Many leftists are nothing but dirty anti-Semites that try (and fail) to hide behind their phony liberal 'tolerance'.
I have yet to see a tolerant liberal. If they could they would repeal the 1st Amendment right along with the 2nd one.

CindyB · #30 (**permalink**) 03-03-2017, 05:24 PM

https://spectator.org/the-women-move...-donna-hylton/

Quote:

The Women Movement’s Embrace of Rape-Torturer Psychopath Donna Hylton

January 25, 2017, 11:51 am

The Women Who Speak for Women

a Twitter, on a Reddit forum, I stumbled over this horrifying story: Donna Hylton, a woman who spent time in prison for participating in the kidnapping, rape, murder, and ransoming of a gay man, spoke at the Women’s March as an advocate for women of color.

Here, Donna Hylton, is being interviewed by CGTN or the Chinese Government Television Network:

Here she is at the Women’s March (go to 12:05 in the video to see her otherwise be stuck watching Cecile Richards):

What did this woman do? From Psychology Today, this:

Vigliarole believed the three girls were prostitutes who were going to have sex with him. Instead, they picked him up on March 8 in Elmhurst, Queens, at Maria’s home, and drugged him to make him drowsy. Then they drove him to Selma’s apartment in Harlem. The apartment had already been prepared for an extended torture session: The closet door had been cut, a pot put in it for use as a toilet, the windows boarded.

For the next 15 to 20 days (police aren’t sure just when Vigliarole died), the man was starved, burned, beaten, and tortured. (Even 10 years later, Spurling could recall Rita’s chilling response when they questioned her about shoving a three-foot metal bar up Vigliarole’s rear: “He was a homo anyway.” How did she know? “When I stuck the bar up his rectum he wiggled.”)

The three girls took turns watching the man. It was Donna who delivered a ransom note and tape to a friend of Vigliarole’s, who was able to get a partial license plate number of the car she was driving. He notified the police, who traced the plate to a rental car facility. On April 6 the suspects were arrested, and detectives spent 36 hours straight interviewing the seven men and women. “We had to keep going back and forth and catch them in lies,” said Spurling. “It was a never-ending circle of lies.”

Spurling himself interviewed Donna: “I couldn’t believe this girl who was so intelligent and nice-looking could be so unemotional about what she was telling me she and her friends had done. They’d squeezed the victim’s testicles with a pair of pliers, beat him, burned him. Actually, I thought the judge’s sentence was lenient. Once a jailbird, always a jailbird.”

***

But there was another moment, on our second day together, when she slipped verbally, and said in an almost irritable way, “He [the victim] was going to die anyway, so . . .” and then she caught herself. I just looked at her. All her previous protestations that when arrested she’d had no idea Vigliarole was dead were clearly lies.
During this interview with the psychologist, Donna Hylton lied and said she was nowhere near the man who died. Evidence disputes this:

Once arrested, Hylton and her friends were put in a holding pen. “I told [the police] these people were going to kill my daughter, we had to find my daughter. I was having nightmares and couldn’t sleep. And it was in all the papers, and people would point to me and say. “There she is,’ like I was some kind of morbid overnight celebrity, the leader of this girl gang. When they told me the victim was dead I just broke down. I didn’t believe it. Look, I know I did something wrong, but I didn’t kill anybody and I didn’t want anybody killed. I wasn’t out for anything evil, maybe love, maybe acceptance.”

Hylton’s signed statement, and the recollections of Detective Spurling, tell a different story. “All the girls’s hairs were on the bedsheet they wrapped him in,” recalled Spurling, “so they were all on the bed with him, or maybe having sex with him.” Rita and Theresa recalled hearing Hylton reading the ransom statement, while Vigliarole’s captors held a knife to his throat and tried to force him to repeat it after them into a tape recorder. She was indeed sighted as the deliverer of the ransom note and tape. [Emphasis added.]

In retrospect, says Mel Paroff, law secretary to Judge Torres, “she was a secondary character, not a mastermind. She didn’t realize the gravity of what she was involved in.” Spurling agrees: “I don’t think the girls were hard-core. They thought they could use their beauty to get what they wanted.”
Donna Hylton has a website where she focuses on women’s issues and prison reform:

Donna Hylton is a women’s rights activist and criminal justice reform advocate. Donna speaks publicly about the issues facing incarcerated women and girls and the significant impact the significant increase in the female prison population is having on families, children and our communities.
Donna Hylton is beautiful. She is intelligent. She was abused. Her interviewer called her “hypnotic” which is often how psychopaths are described.

She is quite beautiful, but more than beautiful–she has a hypnotic kind of sweetness that made it hard to concentrate on what she was saying. I preferred simply to watch her, as one might watch a monologist on an empty stage, lit by a single, bare bulb. “I don’t know why,” she’d said on that first visit, “but I keep feeling things are going to get better. It’s like a fairy tale. There’s going to be a happy-ever-after.” [Emphasis added.]
Here’s a quick definition of a psychopath:

Psychopaths display different traits depending on their disorder, but common signs include superficial charm, a grandiose notion of self-worth, the need for stimulation and impulsiveness, pathological lying, the ability to manipulate others and a lack of remorse and empathy.Dec 31, 2015
She is a hypnotic beauty who also participated in the 20-day torture of a man and was an accessory to murder. She drove the ransom note. She never called police. She didn’t attempt to stop the inhumanity of what was happening.

And then, when interviewed about it, she lied.

At the Women’s March, there was no mention of the man who lost his life because of her actions. There was no humility–only defiance. Donna Hylton presented herself as a victim but did not mention her role as victimizer.

Hylton has written a memoir and Rosario Dawson wants to play her.

So, fairytales really do come true for psychopathic torturers–at least they have for Women’s March poster child Donna Hylton.

A heroine for leftist women

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

The Following User Says Thank You to zoriolus For This Useful Post:
jimbo

The Following User Says Thank You to Pretty Flamingo For This Useful Post:
Infidel