No. It's what the article says.
Feel free to explain where you think I'm wrong.

I have to chuckle at this thread in a broader context.
Conservatives whine and byatch and mewl how they don't like getting stereo-typed as racists.
Obviously, while there are some conservatives who are racist, that doesn't mean we should paint with a broad brush...

But then how do conservatives behave in this thread?
One straight woman blocks a transgender cop and suddenly "liberals" are guilty...


Agreed.

__________________
“Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.”
~Abraham Lincoln

There comes a time when running around in circles with you is just too much of a waste of time. I’m done here.

__________________
.
If I had a dollar for every time girls found me unattractive, eventually they'd find me attractive...

So you're going to stop denying what the article is actually saying?

Oh my. I guess that's just plain awful...


We've got one straight woman who actually did the deed that night.
Later, when the article was posted some anonymous poster made statements which in no way can be counted as factual knowledge of that night.

The right has spent three pages trying to pretend that somehow can be stereo-typed onto the whole.
It's really not that difficult to recognize.

__________________
“Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.”
~Abraham Lincoln