Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > General Forum > News & Current Events
Register FAQDonate PW Store PW Trivia Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

News & Current Events Discuss Judge Rules In Favor of Man Who Shot Down Drone at the General Forum; Originally Posted by mr. wonder you can't seem to remember what you said from one post to the next. your ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-2015, 06:23 PM
foundit66's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,620
Thanks: 10,112
Thanked 15,311 Times in 9,282 Posts
Default Re: Judge Rules In Favor of Man Who Shot Down Drone

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr. wonder View Post
you can't seem to remember what you said from one post to the next.

your point here is "With a gun?" "SHOOTING a gun""...with a gun.."
not just "harming property" but harming pro try "WITH A GUN" is what YOU said.
no strawmen here -as usual-- you're just attempting to dodge the point.

My point was not fixating exclusively on the gun.
My point is you can protect your property in a variety of ways. If you have a car on your property, you don't protect your property by shooting the car or beating it with a bat or devolving to any other violence to harm the car.

Suppose somebody were to take a shortcut across your property daily in their car. Without your permission.
Does that mean you have the right to shoot the car (or use other forms of violence) as long as the car is on your property?



Quote:
Originally Posted by mr. wonder View Post
there was no harm to others, just the drone.
your overreacting to the use of guns.
So if I take a baseball bat or a gun to a car parked on my property, is that okay?


Quote:
Originally Posted by mr. wonder
your assuming that the drone hovering over the property with a camera on your kids is NO RISK.
Well u-known you're right. it's not a risk. the offense/crime against privacy is not at risk, it's ALREADY occurred.
And it's time to take action to remedy the offense.
Your reply only proves my point that the action is PUNITIVE instead of protective.


If you're reacting out of a desire to "remedy" an "offense", you're admitting you're not "protecting" anything but rather just looking for retribution.
__________________
“Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.”
~Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
down, drone, favor, judge, man, rules, shot, who

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0