Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > General Forum > News & Current Events
Register FAQDonate PW Store PW Trivia Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

News & Current Events Discuss Intel review backs up finding that Clinton emails had ‘top secret’ information at the General Forum; Originally Posted by ShivaTD I have a long list of reasons why I'd oppose Hillary Clinton but her email account ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2015, 08:28 AM
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,866
Thanks: 10,814
Thanked 8,720 Times in 5,161 Posts
Default Re: Intel review backs up finding that Clinton emails had ‘top secret’ information

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShivaTD View Post
I have a long list of reasons why I'd oppose Hillary Clinton but her email account and classified material doesn't even rank in the top 1,000 of reasons. It is so trivial as to not even be worth discussion. How about she's a slime-bag politician being a far more important reason.
It's more honest than attempting to blame Hillary's actions on someone else.

If it's so trivial as not being worth discussion, then why the long diatribe discussing?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2015, 08:49 AM
ShivaTD's Avatar
Progressive Libertarian
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Immigrant to Arizona
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,429
Thanks: 1,492
Thanked 2,316 Times in 1,842 Posts
Default Re: Intel review backs up finding that Clinton emails had ‘top secret’ information

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbo View Post
It's more honest than attempting to blame Hillary's actions on someone else.

If it's so trivial as not being worth discussion, then why the long diatribe discussing?
Because Republicans are making a mountain out of a molehill.

Let's address something of importance like Hillary Clinton voting for the Iraq War Resolution and then claiming she didn't vote to go to war. Over 5,000 American soldiers died in a war that almost everyone admits was a mistake and that slime-bag Clinton tries to evade her responsibility for that war. As a combat veteran 5,000 dead American soldiers has a lot more meaning to me and it doesn't compare at all to emails that didn't result in anyone dying or any loss of security for the United States.

Benghazi wasn't Clinton's fault nor was there anything she could really do about it. It's a Republican witch hunt that ignored the real problems with Hillary Clinton. The emails are even more of a distraction from the real reasons for opposing Hillary Clinton, that's a problem, and that's why I voice the opinion that this is BS because it ignores what is really wrong with Hillary Clinton. Let's nail her based upon her BS politics and not some side-show about Benghazi or private emails.
__________________
"I always had a rule, if a restaurant is dirty on the outside, it's dirty on the inside." Donald Trump

"I always had a rule, if the White House is dirty on the inside, it's dirty on the outside." ShivaTD

Based upon the corruption, brutality, inhumanity, immorality, dishonesty, and incompetence of the Trump administration the White House is the dirtiest house in America and there's no known cleanser that with remove the stains of the Trump Administration.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2015, 09:13 AM
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,866
Thanks: 10,814
Thanked 8,720 Times in 5,161 Posts
Default Re: Intel review backs up finding that Clinton emails had ‘top secret’ information

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShivaTD View Post
Because Republicans are making a mountain out of a molehill.

Let's address something of importance like Hillary Clinton voting for the Iraq War Resolution and then claiming she didn't vote to go to war. Over 5,000 American soldiers died in a war that almost everyone admits was a mistake and that slime-bag Clinton tries to evade her responsibility for that war. As a combat veteran 5,000 dead American soldiers has a lot more meaning to me and it doesn't compare at all to emails that didn't result in anyone dying or any loss of security for the United States.

Benghazi wasn't Clinton's fault nor was there anything she could really do about it. It's a Republican witch hunt that ignored the real problems with Hillary Clinton. The emails are even more of a distraction from the real reasons for opposing Hillary Clinton, that's a problem, and that's why I voice the opinion that this is BS because it ignores what is really wrong with Hillary Clinton. Let's nail her based upon her BS politics and not some side-show about Benghazi or private emails.
Republicans are making a mountain out of a mountain. All the attempts to claim it's Bush's fault, everybody does it, why does it matter? are just Democrats hoping to minimize a deliberate major breach of security by a very high level official who now wants to move to the highest level. If her integrity is just a molehill, then we are even farther down the rat hole than I believe.

At the time of the Benghazi attack and resultant deaths of diplomats, the embassies were under the jurisdiction of the State Department, and State was headed by??. It damn well was Hillary's fault. It's probable that she did not originate the stand down order, or the ignore order, or the order to blame it on a video, but she did all of the above.

The rest of Hillary's baggage, going back to her time on the Nixon investigations, through her time as first lady in AK, to her actions as first lady in the WH, pale in comparison to her handling of the 4th highest position in the nation, her last public job.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jimbo For This Useful Post:
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2015, 09:16 AM
Conservative Sage
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 20,327
Thanks: 14,002
Thanked 15,372 Times in 8,803 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to AZRWinger
Default Re: Intel review backs up finding that Clinton emails had ‘top secret’ information

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShivaTD View Post
No surprise because the State Department has a long history of very lax security related to emails. A review of former Sect of State Condoleezza Rice's and other State Department officials emails also revealed the same problem of the transmission of classified and secret material in email.

It was a culture at the State Department that didn't originate with Hillary Clinton.

It can also be noted that security protocols are often situation dependent. For example I served in Vietnam and the location of ground forces was classified and always encoded for radio transmissions.... except in some cases such as air support that needed to know where the "friendly" forces were immediately and encription wasn't pragmatically possible. In private industry I handled secret information that had to be either attended or secured... unless the fire alarm went of and then you left the material on your desk and exited the building. On a "post examination" without regard for the "situation" the security protocol was violated by not if the "situation" was addressed.

Does this apply to some of the cases of security protocol being ignored at the State Department over the last several adminstrations? In some cases we can assume that it did but without specific knowledge it would be impossible to decide.
As if there is no difference between supposed deficiencies in state department classified document procedures and Hillary setting up a private server to avoid all security and record keeping requirements.

Just like with Fast and Furious you attempt to distract from the Democrat's likely illegal behavior by insisting on an endless investigation of course including Republican administration's. Even though Hillary admits she deliberately set up her own private server and we know it illegally held classified material Hillary cannot be investigated unless we drag Condi Rice in too.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2015, 09:25 AM
Conservative Sage
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 20,327
Thanks: 14,002
Thanked 15,372 Times in 8,803 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to AZRWinger
Default Re: Intel review backs up finding that Clinton emails had ‘top secret’ information

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShivaTD View Post
Because Republicans are making a mountain out of a molehill.

Let's address something of importance like Hillary Clinton voting for the Iraq War Resolution and then claiming she didn't vote to go to war. Over 5,000 American soldiers died in a war that almost everyone admits was a mistake and that slime-bag Clinton tries to evade her responsibility for that war. As a combat veteran 5,000 dead American soldiers has a lot more meaning to me and it doesn't compare at all to emails that didn't result in anyone dying or any loss of security for the United States.

Benghazi wasn't Clinton's fault nor was there anything she could really do about it. It's a Republican witch hunt that ignored the real problems with Hillary Clinton. The emails are even more of a distraction from the real reasons for opposing Hillary Clinton, that's a problem, and that's why I voice the opinion that this is BS because it ignores what is really wrong with Hillary Clinton. Let's nail her based upon her BS politics and not some side-show about Benghazi or private emails.
Claiming Hillary has no responsibility for Benghazi is utter partisan nonsense. Hillary has already publicly stated she was responsible. But to partisan Democrats responsibility carries no consequences, it is one of those political niceties they mouth prior to moving on to a Las Vegas fund raiser or Presidential campaign.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AZRWinger For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
backs, clinton, emails, finding, had, information, intel, review, secret’, that, ‘top

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0