Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > General Forum > News & Current Events
Register FAQDonate PW Store PW Trivia Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

News & Current Events Discuss Expert confirms that voting machines are rigged for democrats at the General Forum; EXPERT CONFIRMS THAT VOTING MACHINES ARE RIGGED FOR DEMOCRATS [QUOTE] EXPERT CONFIRMS THAT VOTING MACHINES ARE RIGGED FOR DEMOCRATS Posted ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2014, 01:48 PM
CindyB's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,331
Thanks: 9,548
Thanked 5,631 Times in 3,480 Posts
Default Expert confirms that voting machines are rigged for democrats

EXPERT CONFIRMS THAT VOTING MACHINES ARE RIGGED FOR DEMOCRATS

[QUOTE]EXPERT CONFIRMS THAT VOTING MACHINES ARE RIGGED FOR DEMOCRATS

Posted by Staff on October 28, 2014

This election cycle we have heard of numerous instances where Republican candidates and staff enter the polls only to find their votes switched to the Democrat opponent. Now there's proof of a massive conspiracy so large that the founding fathers are rolling over in their graves.

From Watchdog.org:

Cook County Board of Elections Deputy Communications Director Jim Scalzitti, told the Illinois Watchdog that, “It was a calibration error of the touch-screen on the machine.”


Now, Watchdog.org is reporting similar evidence of electronic voter fraud in the State of Maryland, where Diebold voting machines are switching Republican votes to Democrat votes:

“When I first selected my candidate on the electronic machine, it would not put the ‘x’ on the candidate I chose — a Republican — but it would put the ‘x’ on the Democrat candidate above it,” Donna Hamilton said.
“This happened multiple times with multiple selections. Every time my choice flipped from Republican to Democrat. Sometimes it required four or five tries to get the ‘x’ to stay on my real selection,” the Frederick, Md., resident said last week.

Queen Anne County Sheriff Gary Hofmann said he encountered the problem, too, personally.

“This is happening here as well. It occurred on two candidates on my machine. I am glad I checked. Many voters have reported this here as well,” Hofmann, a Republican, wrote in an email Sunday evening.

Even though election officials in both highly Democrat Party controlled states have claimed the “calibration error” excuse, a software developer and expert on touch screens used by U.S. intelligence agencies told reporters that the explanation was bogus.

“It’s a software issue, and it’s incredibly suspicious that a bug like that could slip through accidentally. It defies belief,” said Tony Heller.

“This is being used by the public for voting. Public trust is essential,” he said. “It’s completely unacceptable that an official waved it off as a calibration issue. It’s something that can be easily verified and should be.”

[/QUOT
__________________
The Democrats are not after the truth, they are after the President.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CindyB For This Useful Post:
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2014, 01:53 PM
Surly's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Midwest
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,299
Thanks: 2,822
Thanked 3,069 Times in 2,400 Posts
Default Re: Expert confirms that voting machines are rigged for democrats

Is there an echo in here? Seems to me I hear a version of this story every election. DejaVu all over again? [quote=CindyB;710187]EXPERT CONFIRMS THAT VOTING MACHINES ARE RIGGED FOR DEMOCRATS

Quote:
EXPERT CONFIRMS THAT VOTING MACHINES ARE RIGGED FOR DEMOCRATS

Posted by Staff on October 28, 2014

This election cycle we have heard of numerous instances where Republican candidates and staff enter the polls only to find their votes switched to the Democrat opponent. Now there's proof of a massive conspiracy so large that the founding fathers are rolling over in their graves.

From Watchdog.org:

Cook County Board of Elections Deputy Communications Director Jim Scalzitti, told the Illinois Watchdog that, “It was a calibration error of the touch-screen on the machine.”


Now, Watchdog.org is reporting similar evidence of electronic voter fraud in the State of Maryland, where Diebold voting machines are switching Republican votes to Democrat votes:

“When I first selected my candidate on the electronic machine, it would not put the ‘x’ on the candidate I chose — a Republican — but it would put the ‘x’ on the Democrat candidate above it,” Donna Hamilton said.
“This happened multiple times with multiple selections. Every time my choice flipped from Republican to Democrat. Sometimes it required four or five tries to get the ‘x’ to stay on my real selection,” the Frederick, Md., resident said last week.

Queen Anne County Sheriff Gary Hofmann said he encountered the problem, too, personally.

“This is happening here as well. It occurred on two candidates on my machine. I am glad I checked. Many voters have reported this here as well,” Hofmann, a Republican, wrote in an email Sunday evening.

Even though election officials in both highly Democrat Party controlled states have claimed the “calibration error” excuse, a software developer and expert on touch screens used by U.S. intelligence agencies told reporters that the explanation was bogus.

“It’s a software issue, and it’s incredibly suspicious that a bug like that could slip through accidentally. It defies belief,” said Tony Heller.

“This is being used by the public for voting. Public trust is essential,” he said. “It’s completely unacceptable that an official waved it off as a calibration issue. It’s something that can be easily verified and should be.”

[/QUOT
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Surly For This Useful Post:
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2014, 01:53 PM
Dave1's Avatar
...Fair and Balanced...
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,126
Thanks: 4,089
Thanked 5,160 Times in 3,049 Posts
Default Re: Expert confirms that voting machines are rigged for democrats

How many machines and in what states specifically…..??

~ It's only democrats that cheat…..??




That's a little to biased for me, sorry….
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dave1 For This Useful Post:
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2014, 01:56 PM
WallyWager's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Michigan
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,945
Thanks: 1,578
Thanked 9,098 Times in 5,817 Posts
Default Re: Expert confirms that voting machines are rigged for democrats

Pardon?

Quote:
Percy Bostick, 69, of Greensboro said he tried casting a vote for Democrat Kay Hagan at the Old Guilford County Courthouse, only to have the machine register Republican Thom Tillis as his choice.

"I called one of the poll workers over," Bostick said. "She said do it again. And again, I touched the screen at the proper place for Kay Hagan, and it again reported it for Thom Tillis."

On his fourth attempt, the machine registered the vote for Hagan. Another poll worker decided to cancel the ballot altogether and directed Bostick to an adjacent machine, where he was able to cast his ballot without any issues.

N.C. Voting Machines Changed Democratic Votes to Republican Ones
For the record, I don't believe either party is deliberately rigging the electronic voting machines. Bugs, errors, and glitches happen in all sorts of electronic devices. Voting machines are no exception.


__________________
"I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side." - Donald Trump, on pedophile Jeff Epstein.

Last edited by WallyWager; 11-03-2014 at 02:01 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2014, 02:21 PM
foundit66's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,616
Thanks: 10,112
Thanked 15,301 Times in 9,276 Posts
Default Re: Expert confirms that voting machines are rigged for democrats

Quote:
Originally Posted by WallyWager View Post
Pardon?
For the record, I don't believe either party is deliberately rigging the electronic voting machines. Bugs, errors, and glitches happen in all sorts of electronic devices. Voting machines are no exception.
2012 Voting Machines Altering Votes - YouTube
WV Vote Flipping Caught on Tape - YouTube
Especially since publication of such a finding (since it's so stupidly blatant in these examples) would lead to quick finger-pointing.

I find it hilarious that they think Maryland is a place to push this as a conspiracy.
If I were to want to rig some votes, I wouldn't do it in a state that was already predominantly democrat in the first place. You're taking a risk in doing something illegal when, without doing anything, the democrats are going to win big already anyways...
United States Senate election in Maryland, 2012 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
United States House of Representatives elections in Maryland, 2012 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
United States presidential election in Maryland, 2012 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Democrat votes ALREADY outweigh the Repub votes by a factor of almost two to one. So why tamper with the votes?


I think the difference is...
For Democrats, many of us see it as a problem to eliminate electronic voting machines.
For Republicans, they try to use it as an excuse to claim "fraud" and push their disenfranchisement agenda.
__________________
“Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.”
~Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2014, 03:13 PM
CindyB's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,331
Thanks: 9,548
Thanked 5,631 Times in 3,480 Posts
Default Voter Fraud: We’ve Got Proof It’s Easy

Voter Fraud: We?ve Got Proof It?s Easy | National Review Online
Quote:

JANUARY 12, 2014 6:30 PM

Voter Fraud: We’ve Got Proof It’s Easy

Undercover agents were able to vote as dead people, but election officials are attacking the agents.

By John Fund

Liberals who oppose efforts to prevent voter fraud claim that there is no fraud — or at least not any that involves voting in person at the polls.

But New York City’s watchdog Department of Investigations has just provided the latest evidence of how easy it is to commit voter fraud that is almost undetectable.

DOI undercover agents showed up at 63 polling places last fall and pretended to be voters who should have been turned away by election officials; the agents assumed the names of individuals who had died or moved out of town, or who were sitting in jail. In 61 instances, or 97 percent of the time, the testers were allowed to vote. Those who did vote cast only a write-in vote for a “John Test” so as to not affect the outcome of any contest. DOI published its findings two weeks ago in a searing 70-page report accusing the city’s Board of Elections of incompetence, waste, nepotism, and lax procedures.

The Board of Elections, which has a $750 million annual budget and a work force of 350 people, reacted in classic bureaucratic fashion, which prompted one city paper to deride it as “a 21st-century survivor of Boss Tweed–style politics.” The Board approved a resolution referring the DOI’s investigators for prosecution. It also asked the state’s attorney general to determine whether DOI had violated the civil rights of voters who had moved or are felons, and it sent a letter of complaint to Mayor Bill de Blasio. Normally, I wouldn’t think de Blasio would give the BOE the time of day, but New York’s new mayor has long been a close ally of former leaders of ACORN, the now-disgraced “community organizing” group that saw its employees convicted of voter-registration fraud all over the country during and after the 2008 election.

Greg Soumas, president of New York’s BOE, offered a justification for calling in the prosecutors: “If something was done in an untoward fashion, it was only done by DOI. We [are] unaware of any color of authority on the part of [DOI] to vote in the identity of any person other than themselves — and our reading of the election law is that such an act constitutes a felony.” The Board is bipartisan, and all but two of its members voted with Soumas. The sole exceptions were Democrat Jose Araujo, who abstained because the DOI report implicated him in hiring his wife and sister-and-law for Board jobs, and Republican Simon Shamoun.
__________________
The Democrats are not after the truth, they are after the President.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2014, 03:25 PM
FrancSevin's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: St Louis MO
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,235
Thanks: 9,489
Thanked 12,943 Times in 7,117 Posts
Default Re: Expert confirms that voting machines are rigged for democrats

Quote:
Originally Posted by WallyWager View Post
Pardon?



For the record, I don't believe either party is deliberately rigging the electronic voting machines. Bugs, errors, and glitches happen in all sorts of electronic devices. Voting machines are no exception.

2012 Voting Machines Altering Votes - YouTube

WV Vote Flipping Caught on Tape - YouTube
So what! think about it. Doesn't that mean that the election process needs scrutiny. Needs better security.

I believe it is the Dems screaming the loudest against any attempts to secure the integrity of the voting process.

BTW,,,,,Thanks for proving the point.
__________________
I am going to hang a Batman Costume in my closet. .......... Just to screw with myself when I get alzheimer's.
sola gratia, sola fide, sola scriptura.

I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN, I AM A FREEMAN, THE DEMOCRATS WORST NIGHTMARE
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2014, 03:30 PM
foundit66's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,616
Thanks: 10,112
Thanked 15,301 Times in 9,276 Posts
Default Re: Voter Fraud: We’ve Got Proof It’s Easy

You're all over the place.

There are procedures for wiping dead people from the records that NEED to be followed. Enforcing EXISTING procedures is the proper recourse when such things are noted.
And if you're pushing for that, you've got my support 110%

If you want to add OTHER measures which will disenfranchise voters, that's the wrong way to go.
__________________
“Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.”
~Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to foundit66 For This Useful Post:
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2014, 04:33 PM
Oftencold's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 18,936
Thanks: 11,660
Thanked 9,718 Times in 6,203 Posts
Default Re: Expert confirms that voting machines are rigged for democrats

[quote=Surly;710190]Is there an echo in here? Seems to me I hear a version of this story every election. DejaVu all over again? That's because the Democrat Party is corrupt and repeats its crimes as well as its "pie in the sky" promises every election cycle. There is a lesson here.
__________________
“Quod scripsi, scripsi"

╠═════════════════════════════════════╣

“Serpent's breath, charm of death and life, thy omen of making!”
Or if you're a traditionalist,
“Anál nathrach, orth’ bháis’s bethad, do chél dénmha!”
And children, say it like you mean it!

╠═════════════════════════════════════╣
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2014, 07:00 PM
CindyB's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,331
Thanks: 9,548
Thanked 5,631 Times in 3,480 Posts
Default Democratic CT State Representative Busted on 19 Charges of Voter Fraud

Bridgeport State Rep. Christina Ayala arrested on 19 voting fraud charges

Quote:
Bridgeport State Rep. Christina Ayala arrested on 19 voting fraud charges

HARTFORD >> State Rep. Christina “Tita” Ayala, D-Bridgeport, was arrested Friday on 19 voting fraud charges.

Ayala, 31, is accused of voting in local and state elections in districts she did not live, the Chief State’s Attorney’s Office said in a press release.

The arrest warrant affidavit also alleges Ayala provided fabricated evidence to state Election Enforcement Commission investigators that showed she lived at an address in a district where she voted while actually living outside the district, according to the release.

Ayala, who represents the 128th District, was elected in 2012, replacing her cousin, Andres Ayala, who was elected to the state Senate. She chose to run for reelection earlier this year, despite the voting fraud investigation, but lost a four-way primary in August.

The Elections Enforcement Commission referred the case to the Office of the Chief State’s Attorney in October 2013, recommending criminal charges.

Ayala allegedly voted in various Bridgeport Democratic Town Committee elections, a municipal primary election and a state primary election between 2009 and 2012 in districts inconsistent with the location of her residence, according to the release. She is also accused of voting in the Bridgeport state general election in 2012 in a district where she didn’t live.

According to the Connecticut Post, Ayala’s mother, Santa, was also investigated by the Elections Enforcement Commission. The commission also recommended criminal charges be filed against Santa Ayala, the Democratic registrar of voters in Bridgeport, but none have been filed as of Friday.

Christina Ayala was charged with eight counts of fraudulent voting, 10 counts of primary or enrollment violations and one count of tampering with or fabricating physical evidence.

According to the release, fraudulent voting is a felony punishable by not less than one year or more than two years in prison and a fine of $300 to $500 per count. Primary or enrollment violations and tampering with or fabricating physical evidence are class D felonies carrying a maximum prison sentence of up to five years per count.

Ayala’s arrest is not her first run-in with the law since her political career began in 2012.

She was fined $350 for a hit-and-run car accident shortly after winning the 2012 Democratic primary for the House seat. She later got into a fight with her boyfriend and faced domestic violence charges, which were dropped after she completed counseling.

In this case, Ayala was released on a promise to appear in court Oct. 7 for her arraignment.

The Associated Press contributed to this story.
__________________
The Democrats are not after the truth, they are after the President.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
are, confirms, democrats, expert, for, machines, rigged, that, voting

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0