River said it's not a war.
well may not maybe it's genocide.

But please tell me, those of you who want this.
DO i get to CHOOSE to NOT pay for this Horror with MY tax dollars.

Not sure why i'm asking, the left thinks they have a right to go in my pocket and take their fair share for what ever they think is "good".
I don't have a say because i'm to mean and hateful and controlling to pay to kill babies in the womb, they have to do it against my wishes.

__________________
Hope is the dream of the waking man.
Aristotle

For there is hope of a tree, if it be cut down, that it will sprout again, and that the tender branch thereof will not cease.
Job 14:6-8

More were killed by birth control and fertilization assistance than by abortion.

When we use pesticide to kill insects, is it a war? Or genocide?

I wish we could choose where our tax dollars got used.

IMO, however, tax dollars shouldn't be used for any medical procedures. But, given the choice to pay for birth control or an abortion with my tax dollars and paying for the rearing of an unwanted, potentially disabled child, I'll choose paying for the birth control or abortion.

__________________


To tax the larger incomes at a higher percentage than the smaller, is to lay a tax on industry and economy; to impose a penalty on people for having worked harder and saved more than their neighbors. ~ John Stuart Mill

Gypsy Soul Memories
Scuba Diver Life
Success Freaks

Not the topic of the article but that's a SERIOUS problem too, are you with me in stopping that. or are you trying to dodge the issue at hand.

And River, if i post a request asking for money for children dying in Cambodia will you immediately say "there are more staving children in Guatemala WHY DON'T YOU HELP THEM? If you don't YOUR a Hypocrite!!!"
It's a sick argument, especially when you don't give a crap about helping either group. And are actually Promoting the death of both.

Are women getting insects killed in the womb?

But we don't get to choose (even though we should be)
Given the choice, i'd help pay for the handicapped child, however you assume the worse of the child and that most children will be some how handicapped it's just not true.

__________________
Hope is the dream of the waking man.
Aristotle

For there is hope of a tree, if it be cut down, that it will sprout again, and that the tender branch thereof will not cease.
Job 14:6-8

So why do you continue to focus on something that harms far fewer innocent wittle children?

Yes. If your idea of stomping something out is to focus on the part that does the least of what you want to stomp out then either you're a ****ing idiot or a hypocrite.

x kills 10,000,000
y kills 30,000

OO OO!! Let's focus ALL of our efforts on 'y' and ignore x!

Pahlease.

Helping what group?

Insects have more mental and physical capacity than a zef. So it would stand to reason that if you think killing something akin to a vegetable is a "war" then surely killing creatures who can actually think and feel must also be a war, no? If not, why not? Don't you care about the insects?

I assume many would be handicapped, and that IS true.

__________________


To tax the larger incomes at a higher percentage than the smaller, is to lay a tax on industry and economy; to impose a penalty on people for having worked harder and saved more than their neighbors. ~ John Stuart Mill

Gypsy Soul Memories
Scuba Diver Life
Success Freaks

__________________
Never annoy a cat. We like our meals hot and bleeding.

Vegetables don't inspire women to get baby showers, Insect don't don't inspire women to get baby showers. the scientific fact is from conception it is a human being.
not and insect not a vegetable or any other type of creature or inanimate object. What your doing is called Dehumanization, to allow yourself to maintain the slaughter. people in a coma don't "think" or "Feel" Do we kill them or do we try to effect a recovery to full use. Why not wait for the NATURALLY developing use. the use of ANY faculty is NOT the marker of Humanity.

And how would one know if a child was growing to be handicapped unless you checked.
A handicapped child is not an insect. but your suggesting that it be killed just the same.

__________________
Hope is the dream of the waking man.
Aristotle

For there is hope of a tree, if it be cut down, that it will sprout again, and that the tender branch thereof will not cease.
Job 14:6-8

Women "get baby showers" because baby stuff is so frickin' expensive.
One decent baby outfit costs twenty bucks, and a newborn will go through three or four (at least) outfits a day, and will have outgrown all of his clothes and need an entire new wardrobe by three or four months.
A crib (with mattress) costs a thousand bucks. Toys are expensive. Diapers are outrageous. Formula is at least forty bucks for two weeks' worth. They've got new parents over a barrel.
This is why women (only in the US) have baby showers.
In the UK and other industrialized nations where there is more social assistance for new parents, baby showers are not done.

Sincerely, somebody who had a baby last year.

__________________

They aren't nearly as expensive.

Yes, and?

No, it's not. A zef is most assuredly human. That's just not relevant.

Yes, they do. More than that, they have the physical capacity to think and feel.

We pull the plug on people who have lost all physical capacity for thought or feeling.

Humanity isn't the issue. Species isn't relevant.


I stated that a number of children would be born handicapped were all women forced to carry to term. That's just common sense. Women who don't want a creature growing inside them are going to continue drinking alcohol and using drugs.

An insect has more capability of thought and feeling than a zef does. That's what I'm "suggesting".

__________________


To tax the larger incomes at a higher percentage than the smaller, is to lay a tax on industry and economy; to impose a penalty on people for having worked harder and saved more than their neighbors. ~ John Stuart Mill

Gypsy Soul Memories
Scuba Diver Life
Success Freaks

"zef" "creature" "not relevant"
All of the above is classic dehumanization.

Before 1967 the Aborigines were not considered in human but wildlife. zefs

Women were considered by some learned U.K.s in the 1900s not only " not the human race they were not half the human race, but a sub-species set apart". zefs

sexual sadism was committed in the 1990's in Yugoslavia by the who Serbs claimed they were “not doing these things to fellow human beings, but to Muslims." zefs

Aristotle’s defense of slavery, where he said the human essence is characterized by the capacity for reason,
but in non-Greeks this is present only in a rudimentary form, thus making them slaves by nature. zefs


There was a theory that Native Americans were not human. This attractive notion was debated in the courts and coffeehouses of Europe for over a century before the Pope came out with his famous bull. Later on, the idea was embroidered. Indians were members of the human race but they didn’t have souls.
"Humanity isn't the issue.... Species isn't relevant. ...
they don't have ...."
Factor X
Souls, reason, the proper gender, the proper religion, the proper race, feelings, thought etc, etc, etc...

Whatever allows for some moral cover to steal, rape, experiment and kill at will.


It's dehumanization plan and simply.
The plan science clearly proves us all distinct humans from conception. , Its the PRIMARY relevant issue to our humanity. Picking an arbitrary attribute or function After that point is just BS. and for your own personal satisfaction. But what you've chosen out of the air is not a standard that's ever been applied and that YOU don't even really fight for. The unborn you believe who really do think and feel. You just lay down for when your abortion mad comrades promote abortion up to birth.

__________________
Hope is the dream of the waking man.
Aristotle

For there is hope of a tree, if it be cut down, that it will sprout again, and that the tender branch thereof will not cease.
Job 14:6-8

So when I say something is human, it's dehumanizing? LOL

Yes, I know. And?

Who's doing that?

Nothing has been "chosen out of the air". My position is based solely on biology. And no I do not "lay down" for people who support late term abortions on demand. Try again.

__________________


To tax the larger incomes at a higher percentage than the smaller, is to lay a tax on industry and economy; to impose a penalty on people for having worked harder and saved more than their neighbors. ~ John Stuart Mill

Gypsy Soul Memories
Scuba Diver Life
Success Freaks