Quote:
Originally Posted by faithful_servant
Horsecrap. If that was the case, then Clinton would have NEVER been re-elected.
|
In today's world where sex scandals have this level of an impact, probably. But then again Clinton was already President, had already experienced a couple of allegations, and had been doing a good job at the time, combined that with a weaksauced GOP opposition. So maybe not, but who knows, and why are we even talking about Bill Clinton? This is a Cain thread, not a "What if, therefore victim." thread.
Well, maybe Anthony Weiner knows. I was at Cedar Point last year when the story basically exploded, it had major coverage on all the cable news channels.
And waitaminnut, Bill Clinton did have a big sex scandal during his Presidency, and the "liberal" media had no trouble covering that from every angle either!
Quote:
Originally Posted by faithful_servant
He was a victim of the liberal media attack machine. Gingrich will be the next one in their crosshairs.
|
Victimvictimvictim, again. Everyone with an R by their name is a victim, I get that, it's been drilled into my head by the right over this entire Presidential cycle. If someone emerges as a frontrunner, and the media focuses their attention on that particular induvidual, it's not because they're leading in the polland thus gaining more of that precious spotlight and could have a good chance at
becoming our next President; no, it's a conspiracy by the upper echelons of the leftist media machine who even though they were more than willing to report on Obama on Wright/Rezko/Ayers/"bitter"/etc last time around, are at the same time also bought and paid for by the left and a tool of the Dems.
Ok, got it.
I've always been told by conservatives that personal responsibility is something they champion, I guess the exception is when the big bad "liberal" media reports something.