![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Donate | PW Store | PW Trivia | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| News & Current Events Discuss $11K Fine, Possible Arrest ... at the General Forum; The more we resist, the nastier they get ... at what point is flying no longer worth it? When that ... |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
The more we resist, the nastier they get ... at what point is flying no longer worth it? When that point's reached, they'll have successfully controlled our freedom of movement ... this is NOT 'accidental' ... they're 'listening' as well as 'The UN' 'listened' to 68% of the American public saying we didn't want 'DeathCare' ...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ $11,000 fine, arrest possible for some who refuse airport scans and pat downs - South Florida Sun-Sentinel.com $11,000 fine, arrest possible for some who refuse airport scans and pat downs By John Lantigua | Palm Beach Post | 8:59 a.m. EST, November 20, 2010 If you don't want to pass through an airport scanner that allows security agents to see an image of your naked body or to undergo the alternative, a thorough manual search, you may have to find another way to travel this holiday season The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is warning that any would-be commercial airline passenger who enters an airport checkpoint and then refuses to undergo the method of inspection designated by TSA will not be allowed to fly and also will not be permitted to simply leave the airport. That person will have to remain on the premises to be questioned by the TSA and possibly by local law enforcement. Anyone refusing faces fines up to $11,000 and possible arrest. "Once a person submits to the screening process, they can not just decide to leave that process," says Sari Koshetz, regional TSA spokesperson, based in Miami. Koshetz said such passengers would be questioned "until it is determined that they don't pose a threat" to the public. Palm Beach Sheriff's Office spokesperson Teri Barbera said PBSO deputies stationed at the airport would become involved when requested by the TSA. "We will handle each incident on a case-by-case basis," she said. No one will be forcibly searched or arrested "just because they refuse to go through the security procedures," Barbera said. "That may rise to the level of suspicious behavior for the TSA, but it wouldn't rise to the level of suspicious behavior for a deputy," she said. But Barbera said that if a person is judged to be a possible threat, deputies are legally permitted to detain and search that individual. "The deputies will do it at the airport just as they would do it anywhere else," she said. Once cleared by the TSA and deputies, the people will be allowed to leave, she said. Meanwhile, the American Civil Liberties Union was urging Americans to petition the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the TSA, to change the new policies. "All of us have a right to travel without such crude invasions of our privacy," the ACLU said in a statement. "Tell DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano to put in place security measures that respect passengers' privacy rights. You shouldn't have to check your rights when you check your luggage." The ACLU outlined ways for citizens to respond to TSA demands at checkpoints and also provided a form letter for filing complaints. But the TSA stuck to its guns. Testifying before Congress Wednesday, TSA Administrator John S. Pistole said inspectors at the nation's airports would enforce the new policies despite complaints that the search methods are too invasive. "We have to ensure that each person getting on every flight is secure," Pistole said. Asked by U.S. Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) about groups that objected to all forms of bodily search on religious grounds, Pistole didn't waiver: "While we respect that person's beliefs, that person's not going to get on an airplane."
__________________
You have been counted, Thought Criminal Nr. 43680527 Being Politically Correct means always having to say you're sorry. - Charles Osgood |
|
||||
|
It's not accidental. This is all about coercing us into NOT traveling freely whenever we want to wherever we want. It's about controlling our freedom of movement around our own country. This is a PLAN that's being put into effect. More important than that, though ... This disgusting police state 'laying on of hands' in a context not significantly different from sexual molestation is drawing a very clear picture for those with eyes to see it the difference between when we were a FREE and GOVERNED nation as opposed to now, when we are a RULED nation. There's a difference.
__________________
You have been counted, Thought Criminal Nr. 43680527 Being Politically Correct means always having to say you're sorry. - Charles Osgood |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Kings_Knight For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
| Tags |
| $11k, arrest, fine, possible |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|