What do you know about Bin Laden, you can't even spell his name right?

And I proved he worked for the CIA, by posting the link that explains how he worked for the CIA, in the words of the CIA agents, that were involved with him at the time.

Your response was to throw out some BS ad hominum regarding the website it came from, then acting like it was a valid rebuttal.

Again, you're trying to use a general definition to prove a specific issue.

You're trying to make something completely irrelevant to the conversation, relevant.

You proved no such thing sir, you provided a link from the democratic underground that made the same bull**** ass claim that you did and provided the exact same amount of evidence to support it IE 0 ****ing evidence. You are a damn liar, there were no quotes form CIA agents who were involved with him whatsoever.

Do you even know what evidence ****ing is?

You're a god damn ****ing liar, your source had no quotations from members of the CIA claiming to have worked with OBL, you posted a link to democratic underground which only made the same exact claims you made and provided absolutely 0 evidence to back it up. Flat earthers provide more ****ing evidence for their claims than you and your websites do you dumb ****.

You're trying to assert that working for the government is somehow evidence of the overt theocrat Imam Rauf being a moderate and yet you've claimed that OBL worked for the U.S. government, so unless you are claiming that OBL is a moderate then Rauf having worked for the FBI proves absolutely **** all. The man is an overt theocrat, if that is a moderate in your mind then you need serious help.

Typical ad hominum.


Another ad hominum.


Irrelevant jibberish.