That's right. Only complete sentences, when posted on the internet, are true.

If you are in this country illegally, thus a criminal, are Constitutional rights violated?

You got that right........


Maybe that's the piece of this puzzle that has been missing........


Hmmm........

On both sides.

[Moderator Mode]

Spencer is not moderating you, I am. If he was moderating you, you would know it by it being offset with [Moderator Mode].

He wasn't being a smart ass, he asked you a legitimate question and YOU took it to the next level. Personal attacks against members will not be tolerated. Mods are regular posters as well and would rather NOT take action on every little thing. Indeed even individual Mods make mistakes. All the time.

Instead of trying to attack a person for something posted as a poster instead of a Mod (again, denote the offsets) then making negative references about their moderation abilities, perhaps you should let it go or report it to the moderating TEAM if you feel it is egregious. This has gone far enough. Knock it off...

[/Moderator Mode]

__________________
The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so.

-- Hitler, April 11 1942

So, you can't describe how this law violates anyone's Constitutional Rights?

__________________
“Quod scripsi, scripsi"

"Sometimes, the source of the beautiful dawning light that drives back the darkness, is your house burning"

Really? I took it to the next level? Bwahahahaha!!! He posed his response in a smartass way. Read it again without being biased.
I wasn't in the least combative. I asked a simple question. Calling me combative was an attack, in my opinion. Then telling me to chill out (in bold even) was another form of "attack." I have done nothing wrong that needed chilling out. He, on the other hand, well, I've already stated my case.

All I need is an apology. lol

I'm done.

[Moderator Mode]

I told you to knock it off. I've read it several times and still come to the conclusion that YOU were being the smartass in your second post.

As I read it...

Pink: Judge blocks part of AZ law.
Spence: Are you surprised?
Pink: No, not surprised. What, I can't post about this?
Spence: Woah. I just asked if anyone was actually surprised. I wasn't.
Pink: I'm going to get mad because I was being snarky and couldn't pass it off on Spence. I am going to prove this because I am going to attack him as a Mod to make him look bad.
Spence: Woah, calm down. Quit being snarky. I just asked if you were surprised.
Pink: (AFTER SPENCE EXPLAINED HIMSELF) I'm going to make another assault or two on Spence and refer to his modship and try to make him look bad.

Dabateman: CUT IT OUT

Pink: Continues argument...

NOW, cut it out or risk administrative vacation for both insulting a fellow poster and continuing to be a problem after being warned by a mod. It cannot be more clear.
[/Moderator Mode]

__________________
The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so.

-- Hitler, April 11 1942

If I were speaking to you as Mod you would see Moderation Mode and you know it...you've been around the boards long enough..

That's the way you interpret it but that was not my intention. I simply noted that the challenge was not unexpected and it was a (general) comment.I don't have to "back-peddle" on anything but you need to chill out.

Mods here are free to debate freely as members,we don't always have our mod hats on at all times and you know it. More careful ?!?!?...I simply said that this was not unexpected...you decided to insult me and disrespect me and call me a smartass and as a "Mod" I took no action..

Stop with the insults and drama or I WILL put my mod hat on...understood?

Thank You...

__________________

The Pessimist complains about the wind.
The Optimist expects it to change.
The Realist adjust the sails - William A. Ward

I still don't see much in the way of reason here for the administration to take on Az in this instance.
I guess the part about "checking status"
but it sounds lame to me. The admin may win but at what cost?
Meanwhile neither side is talking about the damned employers.
Why-the-hell-do-these-people-come-here-illegally-anyway???!!


(And don't anybody dare say for flucking "welfare"
They come here for jobs. )

Put about a 100 thousand dollar per person for second or even third offense of an employer. it's GAME OVER.

__________________

They are taking on AZ for Hispanic votes. Nothing more. Nothing less.