Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > Political Forums > The Media
Register FAQDonate Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

The Media Discuss Glenn Beck Agrees US Needs Another Al Qaeda Attack To Protect Us From Immigrants? at the Political Forums; Originally Posted by Adept1 It is not polite to make fun of a persons amputations. Although I do admit that ...

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2009, 01:49 PM
Billo_Really's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,563
Thanks: 103
Thanked 746 Times in 525 Posts
Default Re: Glenn Beck Agrees US Needs Another Al Qaeda Attack To Protect Us From Immigrants?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adept1 View Post
It is not polite to make fun of a persons amputations. Although I do admit that your application did not specify my wearing of flip flops.
Nice try.

Your guilt is proven by your lack of evidence.
__________________


"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy”.

- James Madison
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2009, 01:50 PM
Billo_Really's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,563
Thanks: 103
Thanked 746 Times in 525 Posts
Default Re: Glenn Beck Agrees US Needs Another Al Qaeda Attack To Protect Us From Immigrants?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adept1 View Post
Whether I listen or not does not refute the fact that YOU DID NOT LISTEN.
Prove it!
__________________


"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy”.

- James Madison
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2009, 04:12 PM
Kizzume's Avatar
pronounced kih-zoom
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tacoma, WA USA
Gender: Male
Posts: 955
Thanks: 297
Thanked 501 Times in 324 Posts
Default Re: Glenn Beck Agrees US Needs Another Al Qaeda Attack To Protect Us From Immigrants?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adept1 View Post
Perhaps if you were to actually listen to the whole segment that you actually posted as your "source" instead of reading the misrepresentations written by other wackos you would actually learn something.
The WHOLE segment is less than 8 minutes long and from your comments it is only obvious that you NEVER listened to it.

CIA's former bin Laden expert: "The only chance we have as a country right now is for Osama bin Laden to deploy and detonate a major weapon in the United States." - Boing Boing

Yes that is from the link YOU provided but NEVER listened to.

After you listen to it I will be happy to discuss whatever misconceptions and lack of understandings you come up with.
What the hell? That red text is NOT something I posted. I didn't provide ANY sort of link! I was TRYING to find sources for the whole segment, but out of doing a search with Google News and Yahoo News, I couldn't find it. Talk about disingenuous.

Now, I've watched/listened to the segment now that I've actually heard the whole thing, thanks to the link that you supplied that I did NOT have before, and I happen to agree with much of what was being said--however, I find his comments to be a bit partisan--Glen has to bring up that the same crap was going on when Bush was in office, yet Michael seems to go on about it as if it's some democratic conspiracy to remove guns from the public as some means to fakely reduce the violence happening at our borders. It *IS* ridiculous to have national guard volunteers that are unarmed to watch the borders, and I think Obama saying that he doesn't want to militarize our borders is insane, but Bush did the same thing--not that it makes much difference, but to claim this as some sort of democrat thing is pure partisan bull****. This needs to be stopped talking about in a partisan matter and we need to find out the root of why neither Bush NOR Obama are doing anything about it.

I honestly believe that in the next 4 years we're going to be closer to a North American Union, and it's not a pretty sight.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2009, 04:15 PM
Mikeyy's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southern California
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,464
Thanks: 1,925
Thanked 3,127 Times in 2,233 Posts
Default Re: Glenn Beck Agrees US Needs Another Al Qaeda Attack To Protect Us From Immigrants?

Its ridiculous to think democrats could get that organized.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzume View Post
What the hell? That red text is NOT something I posted. I didn't provide ANY sort of link! I was TRYING to find sources for the whole segment, but out of doing a search with Google News and Yahoo News, I couldn't find it. Talk about disingenuous.

Now, I've watched/listened to the segment now that I've actually heard the whole thing, thanks to the link that you supplied that I did NOT have before, and I happen to agree with much of what was being said--however, I find his comments to be a bit partisan--Glen has to bring up that the same crap was going on when Bush was in office, yet Michael seems to go on about it as if it's some democratic conspiracy to remove guns from the public as some means to fakely reduce the violence happening at our borders. It *IS* ridiculous to have national guard volunteers that are unarmed to watch the borders, and I think Obama saying that he doesn't want to militarize our borders is insane, but Bush did the same thing--not that it makes much difference, but to claim this as some sort of democrat thing is pure partisan bull****. This needs to be stopped talking about in a partisan matter and we need to find out the root of why neither Bush NOR Obama are doing anything about it.

I honestly believe that in the next 4 years we're going to be closer to a North American Union, and it's not a pretty sight.
__________________
Don't take any of it too seriously.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2009, 04:35 PM
One
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Central Florida
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,816
Thanks: 524
Thanked 517 Times in 408 Posts
Default Re: Glenn Beck Agrees US Needs Another Al Qaeda Attack To Protect Us From Immigrants?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billo_Really View Post
Nice try.

Your guilt is proven by your lack of evidence.
So how would anyone (even you perhaps) be able to "prove" that they could "put the shoe on the other foot".
Especially since you yourself misunderstand the analogy.

I did not refer at all to "walking in another persons shoes" I refered to how another person thinks.

Also please note that everyones left foot doesn't wear a right foot shoe.
__________________
"Most people can't think, most of the remainder won't think, the small fraction who do think mostly can't do it very well. The extremely tiny fraction who think regularly, accurately, creatively and without self delusion---In the long run these are the only people that count." ***** Robert Heinlein
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2009, 04:37 PM
One
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Central Florida
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,816
Thanks: 524
Thanked 517 Times in 408 Posts
Default Re: Glenn Beck Agrees US Needs Another Al Qaeda Attack To Protect Us From Immigrants?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billo_Really View Post
Prove it!
Prove what:
That my statement is true........not necessary as it is self evident from the statement itself.
That you did not listen..........see my next post so I can "kill" you twice with the same stone.
__________________
"Most people can't think, most of the remainder won't think, the small fraction who do think mostly can't do it very well. The extremely tiny fraction who think regularly, accurately, creatively and without self delusion---In the long run these are the only people that count." ***** Robert Heinlein
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2009, 04:59 PM
One
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Central Florida
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,816
Thanks: 524
Thanked 517 Times in 408 Posts
Default Re: Glenn Beck Agrees US Needs Another Al Qaeda Attack To Protect Us From Immigrants?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzume View Post
What the hell? That red text is NOT something I posted. I didn't provide ANY sort of link! I was TRYING to find sources for the whole segment, but out of doing a search with Google News and Yahoo News, I couldn't find it. Talk about disingenuous.
Well go back yourself to those two pages you CITED and see for yourself that my posting IS among them.
Now, I've watched/listened to the segment now that I've actually heard the whole thing, thanks to the link that you supplied that I did NOT have before, and I happen to agree with much of what was being said--however, I find his comments to be a bit partisan--Glen has to bring up that the same crap was going on when Bush was in office, yet Michael seems to go on about it as if it's some democratic conspiracy to remove guns from the public as some means to fakely reduce the violence happening at our borders. It *IS* ridiculous to have national guard volunteers that are unarmed to watch the borders, and I think Obama saying that he doesn't want to militarize our borders is insane, but Bush did the same thing--not that it makes much difference, but to claim this as some sort of democrat thing is pure partisan bull****. This needs to be stopped talking about in a partisan matter and we need to find out the root of why neither Bush NOR Obama are doing anything about it. Thank you. I admit your insight here is well grounded. (after listening to the "whole" story). Notice however that you still think Glenn is "partisan" just because he is "attacking" those that are currently FAR MORE POWERFUL than GW ever was and are doing far more dangerous things to our country.
Thank you for realizing that BOTH parties are USING partisanship to keep the people out of control.


I honestly believe that in the next 4 years we're going to be closer to a North American Union, and it's not a pretty sight.
If it is wrong when one party does it it is still wrong when the other takes over. See they make YOU think that it is some kind of "partisan argument" and that prevents those of us that agree on 80% or more of the PRINCIPLES to pick at silly details while BOTH parties take OUR POWER (the power "of the people") and use it to increase their power and control. I HATE Republicans almost as much as I hate Democrats.......one is bad and the other is FAR worse. What liberals are about to discover is that they have ANNOYED the large silent and mostly conservative majority (polls still show that America is still slightly right of center on ISSUES) that tends to stay out of the petty bickering until it begins to affect them their families and their livelihood as is happening now.

Since when was it decided that no more States could join the Union? Which amendment said that? Some of us remember when the last two states were added. Come in and play BY THE RULES and it's fine with me..........It's all this "ignore and flaunt the rules" that aggravates me to no end.



Kizzume.......I'm starting to like ya........in a heterosexual way.
__________________
"Most people can't think, most of the remainder won't think, the small fraction who do think mostly can't do it very well. The extremely tiny fraction who think regularly, accurately, creatively and without self delusion---In the long run these are the only people that count." ***** Robert Heinlein
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2009, 05:53 PM
Kizzume's Avatar
pronounced kih-zoom
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tacoma, WA USA
Gender: Male
Posts: 955
Thanks: 297
Thanked 501 Times in 324 Posts
Default Re: Glenn Beck Agrees US Needs Another Al Qaeda Attack To Protect Us From Immigrants?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adept1 View Post
If it is wrong when one party does it it is still wrong when the other takes over. See they make YOU think that it is some kind of "partisan argument" and that prevents those of us that agree on 80% or more of the PRINCIPLES to pick at silly details while BOTH parties take OUR POWER (the power "of the people") and use it to increase their power and control.
You've certainly got that right.
Quote:
I HATE Republicans almost as much as I hate Democrats.......one is bad and the other is FAR worse. What liberals are about to discover is that they have ANNOYED the large silent and mostly conservative majority (polls still show that America is still slightly right of center on ISSUES) that tends to stay out of the petty bickering until it begins to affect them their families and their livelihood as is happening now.
It hasn't truly begun to affect that yet--it's about to, but it hasn't actually started yet. When it does, a lot of people are in for a surprise.
Quote:
Since when was it decided that no more States could join the Union? Which amendment said that? Some of us remember when the last two states were added. Come in and play BY THE RULES and it's fine with me..........It's all this "ignore and flaunt the rules" that aggravates me to no end.


Kizzume.......I'm starting to like ya........in a heterosexual way.
Thanks.

Actually, Glen was the one that was mentioning Bush doing the same thing. It was his guest that was pushing it being on the democrats. Glen was being very reasonable and balanced.

As far as the North American Union, it won't be playing by our rules--the people won't be involved at all it its conception if it is indeed part of "the plan". I sincerely hope it really isn't part of "the plan".
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2009, 05:58 PM
Billo_Really's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,563
Thanks: 103
Thanked 746 Times in 525 Posts
Default Re: Glenn Beck Agrees US Needs Another Al Qaeda Attack To Protect Us From Immigrants?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adept1 View Post
So how would anyone (even you perhaps) be able to "prove" that they could "put the shoe on the other foot".
Especially since you yourself misunderstand the analogy.

I did not refer at all to "walking in another persons shoes" I refered to how another person thinks.

Also please note that everyones left foot doesn't wear a right foot shoe.
Again, you have no clue what you're responding too.
__________________


"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy”.

- James Madison
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2009, 06:00 PM
Billo_Really's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,563
Thanks: 103
Thanked 746 Times in 525 Posts
Default Re: Glenn Beck Agrees US Needs Another Al Qaeda Attack To Protect Us From Immigrants?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adept1 View Post
Prove what:
That my statement is true........not necessary as it is self evident from the statement itself.
That you did not listen..........see my next post so I can "kill" you twice with the same stone.
You're statement isn't true, until you can prove it true.

Which you did not.

Not in the previous post, nor in your next one.
__________________


"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy”.

- James Madison
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
agrees, another, attack, beck, from, glenn, immigrants, needs, protect, qaeda

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.politicalwrinkles.com/media/7939-glenn-beck-agrees-us-needs-another-al-qaeda-attack-protect-us-immigrants.html
Posted By For Type Date
Hot Air Blog Archive Scheuer to Beck: The only chance of saving America is … another Al Qaeda attack This thread Refback 07-04-2009 08:50 AM

Search Engine Optimization and SEO Tools
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0