Democrats and Media Do Not Want to Weaken Facebook, Just Commandeer its Power to Censor

"The social media giant hurts America and the world, this narrative maintains, by permitting misinformation to spread (presumably more so than cable outlets and mainstream newspapers do virtually every week); fostering body image neurosis in young girls through Instagram (presumably more so than fashion magazines, Hollywood and the music industry do with their glorification of young and perfectly-sculpted bodies); promoting polarizing political content in order to keep the citizenry enraged, balkanized and resentful and therefore more eager to stay engaged (presumably in contrast to corporate media outlets, which would never do such a thing); and, worst of all, by failing to sufficiently censor political content that contradicts liberal orthodoxies and diverges from decreed liberal Truth. On Tuesday, Haugen's star turn took her to Washington, where she spent the day testifying before the Senate about Facebook's dangerous refusal to censor even more content and ban even more users than they already do."

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/dem...do-not-want-to

Yuppers...

From the OP

The so-called whistle blower isn't campaigning against Facebook censorship she is arguing for a more extensive program of suppression. It's a typical Marxist Democrat approach criticizing Facebook for allowing choices to be made that displease the ruling elites. The public cannot define the public interest that's exclusively left to the Democrat hegemony which lives in mortal fear of the free exchange of ideas.

__________________
If Democrats were confident their nominee actually received more than 80 million votes they wouldn't have more troops occupying Washington, DC than Lincoln had defending the city during the Civil War. Not Joe Biden, Kim Jung Biden.

How long before we hear the left say, "If you are against censorship, you are a Fascist / Nazi"

__________________
Political Correctness, is Fascism masquerading as manners - George Carlin.