Yup...It's in the Media section for a reason...This article READS "Obama lost a ton of support with Jewish voters", but the headline READS "Nothing to see here! Everything's great!!!!"...

Obama’s Jewish support rises over past six months, AJC poll finds

They start out giving Obama a major back rub, but look at the SCORCHING NUMBERS in the real world...which should've been the headlines...

In other words, the poll shows that Obama is DOWN 17 points from his election and the Republican nominee is UP 10 points...

So when the opening line of the article says "President Obama enjoys the support of three-fifths of American Jews", it SHOULD say "Obama has support of ONLY three-fifths of American Jews, which is down from the OVER three-fourths he originally had."...

This crappy article is one, big lemonade stand for the master...

__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd

Most Jews I ever met were damn smart. Going on that assessment I'd guess they are not going to vote for Romney.

__________________

60W bulb in a 100W world...

The OP is about how the story was reported, which was made very clear in the OP. It's not about whether you think Jews are smart or dumb, it's about the crap job of reporting that passes for journalism these days. The bottom line FACT is that Pres. Obama's support by Jewish people is down SUBSTANTIALLY from when he was elected. But if you read the headline, you would think that it's up. It's called cherry-picking data to try to show the picture you want to see. Any reported with any level of integrity would have reported that while recent trends are showing improvement, his support among Jewish people is still down substantially from the last election. THAT would be good reporting. But in order for you to admit that there's a problem with the media, you'd have to accept that your blind, unreasoning hatred for anything or anyone who doesn't worship at the throne of Obama just might be ever so slightly unjustified.

__________________
Our nation has not always lived up to its ideals, yet those ideals have never ceased to guide us. They expose our flaws, and lead us to mend them. We are the beneficiaries of the work of the generations before us and it is each generation's responsibility to continue that work. - Laura Bush

Leftists and very small children don't seem to be able to understand that the Government isn't there to "fix" the economy, anymore than a tick is there to fix your dog.~Oftencold

__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd

Ironic that people who listen to Bright Bart and repeat everything Fox and Hard right news sites say as gospel would be interested in honest reporting. So I thought I'd add some reality to the debate at least.

__________________

Say what you want about Fox News and the "Hard" right.

But Andrew Breitbart has been deceased for less than two full months now.

It strikes me as rather unseemly to be frivolously corrupting his name, under the circumstances...

Because he was a liar? No. I held my tongue and didn't desecrate the thread on his death ( more than I can say happens when Liberal icons kick the bucket).
But he is fair game now, if for no other reason than he was active to the point of his demise in corrupting minds.

__________________

No, he wasn't. But wanna know who is?



Maybe not, but see how easy that is? Name calling.

Boy speak the truth about their heroes and they get antsy.
Truth hurt?

__________________

Breitbart was an ASS and being dead doesn't change that.

__________________

DISCLAIMER: Extreme amounts of sarcasm can possibly result in inflammatory situations. Not responsible for keyboard violence, spittle on the monitor, irrational responses mistaken for momentary brilliance, one-sided rages against hypocrisy or individual members or unintended consequences such as poor personal hygiene and bad spelling. Please fasten your seatbelts and put your trays in an upright position.