Of course you don’t cause your “explaination” sucks.
You can’t really explain it at all. So you habitually drop the discussion at this stage, only to repeat your nonsense later.

You keep pulling the same stunt.
You keep trying to confuse ACCEPTABLE discrimination (in your opinion) with whether that discrimination actually exists.
It’s like a 360 degree blind spot whereby if you deem a discriminatory act as acceptable, you automatically proclaim the discrimination doesn’t exist in the first place.
Absurd!

Take for example age.
We have clear age discrimination on the issue of marriage. We, as a society, judge some people too young to understand the implications of signing a marriage contract.
Even though we approve of the age discrimination in marriage, that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

I get that you perceive “race” and “sexual orientation” as different. I do.
But the issue here is your false claim the sexual orientation discrimination does not exist in marriage.


You know, you’re pretty much admitting a fundamental failure in reading comprehension here.
Moreover, most people with even rudimentary intelligence could see that my previous statements CLEARLY acknowledge “that boys and girls are different”.

Let me quote the portion that should have clued you in on that…

SAME SEX MARRIAGE laws are discriminatory because:
A man can marry a woman.
A woman cannot marry a woman.
BASED ON GENDER, a difference in legal application is made.
Not an equal right.

__________________
“Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.”
~Abraham Lincoln