Report: Wis. lost 6,200 jobs in April - Page 2

Infidel Dog · #11 (**permalink**) 05-18-2012, 07:24 PM

For crying out loud. That's the same freaking survey from the OP. What are you thinking? If you post it over and over again somebody will think you've found new support for the one that's been discredited, or something?

Or is there some sort of Prog, mind magic that makes something dubious suddenly credible if you repeat it over and over again?

saltwn · #12 (**permalink**) 05-18-2012, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infidel Dog

For crying out loud. That's the same freaking survey from the OP. What are you thinking? If you post it over and over again somebody will think you've found new support for the one that's been discredited, or something?

Or is there some sort of Prog, mind magic that makes something dubious suddenly credible if you repeat it over and over again?

OP

Report says Wisconsin lost 6,200 private-sector jobs in April, added 300 government jobs | StarTribune.com
Wisconsin lost more jobs than any state - Video on msnbc.com

my last post

Disputed state survey shows April job loss - JSOnline

Infidel Dog · #13 (**permalink**) 05-18-2012, 08:37 PM

All I can do now is shake my head, and follow the trap of repeating the repeat to show it's a repeat of the discredited poll.

From the first article.

Quote:

MADISON, Wis. - Wisconsin lost nearly 6,000 jobs in April according to preliminary monthly data state labor officials released Thursday

from the second...

Quote:

preliminary data released Thursday showed that Wisconsin lost an estimated 6,200 private-sector jobs in April.

Again it's the same discredited survey, and there's nothing new. It's just saying the same thing over and over in hope anybody coming in late won't know there is a more extensive study based on hard data as opposed to the extrapolation from 3% from the discredited OP study, or that the unemployment rate has actually dropped, or that a leading economist showed several data points contradicting its claims.

And your reply is going to be what? To post another link to the exact same discredited survey I suppose.

saltwn · #14 (**permalink**) 05-18-2012, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infidel Dog

All I can do now is shake my head, and follow the trap of repeating the repeat to show it's a repeat of the discredited poll.

From the first article.

from the second...

Again it's the same discredited survey, and there's nothing new. It's just saying the same thing over and over in hope anybody coming in late won't know there is a more extensive study based on hard data as opposed to the extrapolation from 3% from the discredited OP study, or that the unemployment rate has actually dropped, or that a leading economist showed several data points contradicting its claims.

And your reply is going to be what? To post another link to the exact same discredited survey I suppose.

If you will READ the last link I gave you you will see nothing has been discredited. It is still up in the air.

Infidel Dog · #15 (**permalink**) 05-19-2012, 04:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saltwn

If you will READ the last link I gave you you will see nothing has been discredited. It is still up in the air.

Yes, but don't you understand, being "up in the air" after the BLS report is contradicted by other data is what discredits it. It's not the holy grail of proof of unemployment in Wisconsin. It's discredited as such.

It's like your second link says (which incidentally I read before I saw your first one).

Quote:

If not for the dispute over the accuracy of the numbers, the same jobs report in any other month would have ignited renewed debate about the sluggish recovery.

So you see. Your survey is disputed. To reply to the dispute by posting a repeat link to the same survey that's being disputed by other data is nuts.

AZRWinger · #16 (**permalink**) 05-20-2012, 10:40 AM

Oh the irony of recall election backers criticizing Walker for rushing out employment numbers after supporting a sham recall petition validation procedure where state election officials washed their hands of responsibilty for fraud detection and set an impossible deadline for Walker's campaign to verify the signatures. Does anyone really believe the union loving OA wouldn't have delayed validation of employment numbers favorable to Walker until after the recall election? Please.

trappedinonepartyillinois · #17 (**permalink**) 05-25-2012, 11:50 PM

As a resident of northern Illinois I want Walker to lose. The exodus of people of jobs north will stop then.

saltwn · #18 (**permalink**) 06-02-2012, 09:58 PM

Looks like he's tried more shenanigans. Hunters are upset. I'll post a thread.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

The Following User Says Thank You to Infidel Dog For This Useful Post:
MrLiberty