The juiciest morsel in Mueller’s charges against Roger Stone - Page 2

saltwn · #11 (**permalink**) 01-27-2019, 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lumara

It is public knowledge that Hillary was behind the fake dossier designed to bring down Trump, so why didn't a group of armed thugs surround her home and arrest her? This double standard proves the blatant corruption in the FBI and the protected criminal class in our government, so when will something be done about that?

it's public knowledge a republican candidate PAC hired the company and dropped them when their boy bowed out. At the same time a Hillary PAC picked them up.
Gah!! @#$%^%#@# I wish y'all would read real fricken news instead of comic book versions of the truth!

saltwn · #12 (**permalink**) 01-27-2019, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cnredd

First, I don't know how you can say its not true...It's actually old news...

The Clinton Campaign paid a law firm to use as a middleman, who paid Fusion GPS, who contracted Steele for the dossier...

Clinton Campaign, DNC Helped Fund Research That Became Notorious Trump 'Dossier'

But as to the second part if your question, ("what crime was committed in compiling that information?")...

The problem here is the lack of consistency within the Mueller investigation...

If people within the Trump campaign are guilty of colluding with foreign agents to get dirt on his political opponent (Hillary), then people within the Hillary Campaign (and the Democrat National Party) are EQUALLY guilty of colluding with foreign agents to get dirt on HER political opponent (Trump)...

OR...

If people within the Hillary campaign (and the Democrat National Party) are NOT guilty, even though they colluded with foreign agents to get dirt on her political opponent (Trump), then people within the Trump Campaign are EQUALLY NOT guilty, even though they colluded with foreign agents to get dirt on his political opponent (Hillary)...

It is simply UNEQUAL application of the law to say both sides did the same thing, yet only one of them is accountable while the other gets a free pass...

I explained who hired who above.

If Hillary had become President and begun to change American policy to favor Putin, stood to gain personally, and many members of her campaign lied that they met with Russians (their meeting not a crime -lying about it to fbi and congress was),
then you can bet your ginger azz she would be investigated.
But she did not become POTUS. The other azzhole did.

Constant_Slothrop · #13 (**permalink**) 01-27-2019, 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cnredd

First, I don't know how you can say its not true...It's actually old news...

The Clinton Campaign paid a law firm to use as a middleman, who paid Fusion GPS, who contracted Steele for the dossier...

Clinton Campaign, DNC Helped Fund Research That Became Notorious Trump 'Dossier'

But as to the second part if your question, ("what crime was committed in compiling that information?")...

The problem here is the lack of consistency within the Mueller investigation...

If people within the Trump campaign are guilty of colluding with foreign agents to get dirt on his political opponent (Hillary), then people within the Hillary Campaign (and the Democrat National Party) are EQUALLY guilty of colluding with foreign agents to get dirt on HER political opponent (Trump)...

OR...

If people within the Hillary campaign (and the Democrat National Party) are NOT guilty, even though they colluded with foreign agents to get dirt on her political opponent (Trump), then people within the Trump Campaign are EQUALLY NOT guilty, even though they colluded with foreign agents to get dirt on his political opponent (Hillary)...

It is simply UNEQUAL application of the law to say both sides did the same thing, yet only one of them is accountable while the other gets a free pass...

It’s a ludicrous false equivalence. The Russians committed multiple felonies to steal the information they provided to Wikileaks on behalf of the Trump campaign. How many crimes were committed to obtain the information Steele collected?

mr wonder · #14 (**permalink**) 01-27-2019, 11:08 PM

Stone, was on the radio talking about about trying to get wikileaks info during the campaign. Assange and others at Wikileaks were also publicly saying they had more info they were going to release during the campaign.
I'm not sure whats in this "investigation" report is news.
many news outlets have covered Stones minimal contacts and attempted contacts and NON-contact with wikileaks long ago.
And found there's nothing really there.
And Sorry but the "...maybe/hopefully Muller found more..." train has yet to deliver jack.

BTW the !RUSSIA! "connection" is also missing here.

AZRWinger · #15 (**permalink**) 01-31-2019, 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Constant_Slothrop

It’s a ludicrous false equivalence. The Russians committed multiple felonies to steal the information they provided to Wikileaks on behalf of the Trump campaign. How many crimes were committed to obtain the information Steele collected?

The Russian boogeyman committed multiple felonies hacking the DNC servers... That's why we have an unaccountable, unelected special councilor acting as a fourth branch of government employing police state tactics in pursuit of destroying the Trump administration.

Jeerleader · #16 (**permalink**) 02-02-2019, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Constant_Slothrop

The Russians committed multiple felonies to steal the information they provided to Wikileaks on behalf of the Trump campaign.

All the Russians did was follow through on Democrat promises of transparency.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mr wonder For This Useful Post:
AZRWinger, GetAClue

The Following User Says Thank You to AZRWinger For This Useful Post:
GetAClue