Revealed: U.S. may put missile defence in Lithuania

[North Pole Resident]

Well.... well... well...
It's getting interesting now.... It looks like we are getting closer and closer to repeating the 1941 all over again.....


June 18, 2008
Revealed: U.S. may put missile defence in Lithuania

The U.S. is talking to Lithuania about the possibility of installing part of its missile defence system there if it fails to strike a deal with Poland, according to the chief Polish negotiator on missile defence.
Poland has agreed to base ten U.S. interceptor rockets on its soil but in exchange it is demanding billions of dollars to upgrade air defence systems.
Washington says it will look for another country if negotiations with Warsaw fail.
Russia strongly opposes the deployment of the missile defence shield, saying it threatens its security.

RussiaToday : News : Revealed: U.S. may put missile defence in Lithuania




Nato is undergoing one of the greatest changes since it was formed in 1949.
Seven eastern European countries - Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia - have been formally invited to join the alliance in 2004.
Another three countries - Croatia, Albania and Macedonia - hope to join the organisation in the next few years.

BBC News | Nato expansion

June 1941
Nazi Germany's Invasion Of The Soviet Union.



Russia At War 1941-1945 Home

[faithful_servant]

Why should something designed strictly as a defensive system concern Russia? I'm sure that if an attack was launched at them by a terroist org. could be intercepted by our system, they'd be happy to have it between them and the attack.

[North Pole Resident]

Originally Posted by faithful_servant

Why should something designed strictly as a defensive system concern Russia?

Sorry... I am confused here. Defence against who or what?

Originally Posted by faithful_servant

I'm sure that if an attack was launched at them by a terroist org. could be intercepted by our system, they'd be happy to have it between them and the attack.

Oh.... boy... Now I am even more confused. What terrorist organization are you talking about?

[faithful_servant]

Originally Posted by North Pole Resident

Sorry... I am confused here. Defence against who or what?
Anyone who would want to attack any nation in E. Europe.




Oh.... boy... Now I am even more confused. What terrorist organization are you talking about?

Any terrorist org. that would want to attack any nationin E. Europe.

[North Pole Resident]

Originally Posted by faithful_servant

Any terrorist org. that would want to attack any nationin E. Europe.

Can you name a "terrorist organization" which has the intercontinental ballistic missiles? And can you also explain WHERE do they keep them?

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/250/5...e61154aa_o.jpg

[AmericanDreamer]

Originally Posted by North Pole Resident

Can you name a "terrorist organization" which has the intercontinental ballistic missiles? And can you also explain WHERE do they keep them?

Forget the missle. Something smaller makes more sense. They can gut the missle and remove the warhead? Maybe retrofit some and put it in a suitcase??



Al'Qaida Nukes Are Here In The United States!

It's less conspicuous walking down the street with a suitcase, rather than with an ICBM



End result???

[faithful_servant]

Originally Posted by North Pole Resident

Can you name a "terrorist organization" which has the intercontinental ballistic missiles? And can you also explain WHERE do they keep them?

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/250/5...e61154aa_o.jpg

I'm just saying that being prepared is better than being taken by surpise. Would you rather spend some money to defend against a threat that may never occur or ignore the issue and hope that no one manages to pulll off an attack and kill millions of people? We're just there to make sure that any potential attackers can be stopped and millions of lives protected (Russian, Lithuanian, Polish, etc.). Why should you have a problem with protecting the live of innocent people??

[mlurp]

Originally Posted by faithful_servant

I'm just saying that being prepared is better than being taken by surpise. Would you rather spend some money to defend against a threat that may never occur or ignore the issue and hope that no one manages to pulll off an attack and kill millions of people? We're just there to make sure that any potential attackers can be stopped and millions of lives protected (Russian, Lithuanian, Polish, etc.). Why should you have a problem with protecting the live of innocent people??

What you don't understand is that Russia is messing in the middle east so when it erupts they can roll into Europe.
Putin is a czar like guy who wants more land and resources as did the other czar's.
And NPR is a bit short of a full six pack.
So why bother banging your head against a red wall?

[North Pole Resident]

Originally Posted by faithful_servant

I'm just saying that being prepared is better than being taken by surpise. Would you rather spend some money to defend against a threat that may never occur or ignore the issue and hope that no one manages to pulll off an attack and kill millions of people? We're just there to make sure that any potential attackers can be stopped and millions of lives protected (Russian, Lithuanian, Polish, etc.). Why should you have a problem with protecting the live of innocent people??

Yeah.... OK.....
I asked you two simple questions. Can you just answer them?

[saltwn]

Latvia don't need to aks no stinkin' NP if it wants missile defense.

[saltwn imitating some Hispanic chick imitating some rapper imitating a Latvian citizen]