Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > General Discussion > Health, Wellness, Sex and Body
Register FAQDonate PW Store PW Trivia Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Health, Wellness, Sex and Body Discuss The Miserable Pseudo-Science Behind Face Masks, Social Distancing And Contact Tracing at the General Discussion; This is a pretty long read, but it is worth it if you are interested in the truth. The Miserable ...

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2020, 07:24 AM
GetAClue's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Ohio
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,879
Thanks: 8,382
Thanked 5,909 Times in 3,389 Posts
Default The Miserable Pseudo-Science Behind Face Masks, Social Distancing And Contact Tracing

This is a pretty long read, but it is worth it if you are interested in the truth.

Quote:
The Miserable Pseudo-Science Behind Face Masks, Social Distancing And Contact Tracing

“The American public is being spoon-fed a steady diet of pseudo-science in order to justify the wearing of face masks, social distancing and contact tracing. Yet, the actual science points in the polar opposite direction.”

This is the concluding paragraph in an article at Technocracy News.

This is a clear sign of Technocrats-at-work. Instead, these are the ones who should be exposed, shamed and ridiculed. ”

“In sum, these dangerous and destructive policies are designed to curtail economic activity, break down social cohesion and control people. Moreover, they fit the original mission statement of Technocracy as far back as 1938:
Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population…”
Based on what we have coming from the state’s public health officials, it is apparent they are indeed Technocrats.

According to immunologists and epidemiologists California Globe has interviewed, ordering people indoors, schools closed, mandatory mask-wearing and social distancing is the opposite of what should be done for the health and well-being of society. Herd immunity is supposed to be the real health goal, while protecting those most vulnerable – in the case of coronavirus, is the elderly and infirmed confined to nursing homes.

Technocracy News explains: “Pseudo-science quickly emerged as the principal domain of Technocrats, but they soon found that scientific debate with those promoting real science was most inconvenient to their social engineering goals. The solution was simple: claim that their own pseudo-science was indeed the real science, and then refuse debate by excluding all other voices to the contrary.

Doesn’t this sound exactly like the drivel we are being fed today?

Even as hospitalizations and deaths have dropped, California Gov. Gavin Newsom had his Public Health Director issue a new mandate that all residents must wear face masks, at indoor functions, and outdoors in crowds… unless you are an Antifa rioter or homeless living on city streets.

The Governor issued an Executive Order and had his Public Health Department issue a new directive Thursday, which said this:
Over the last four months, we have learned a lot about COVID-19 transmission, most notably that people who are infected but are asymptomatic or presymptomatic play an important part in community spread. The use of face coverings by everyone can limit the release of infected droplets when talking, coughing, and/or sneezing, as well as reinforce physical distancing.
What once was a directive to flatten the curve has morphed in to “people who are infected but are asymptomatic or presymptomatic play an important part in community spread.”

California Globe reported Dr. Jeffrey Klausner, Professor of Medicine and Public Health at University of California, Los Angeles said:
“I don’t think there’s any evidence that wearing a surgical mask has any benefit to protect someone in general from exposure, or from being infected. We usually recommend people who are ill wear surgical masks to prevent transmission [to others]… it may be kind of an awareness tool, but in terms of its direct benefits, there’s no data,” Dr. Klausner added.
Dr. Brosseau and and Dr. Sietsema, both national experts on respiratory protection and infectious diseases at University of Illinois at Chicago, said, “We do not recommend requiring the general public who do not have symptoms of COVID-19-like illness to routinely wear cloth or surgical masks because, There is no scientific evidence they are effective in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission.”

The law-abiding taxpaying citizens are being “exposed, shamed and ridiculed,” and treated as if they are the lawbreakers, by the government which is supposed to work for the public and for the common good.

Lastly, attorneys Mark Meuser and Harmeet Dhillon have 15 lawsuits against Gov. Gav Newsom for abusing his state of Emergency powers. For this latest abuse and overreach, Meuser recommends that everyone download the #RecallGavin2020 petition, and get 10 neighbors to sign it. Meuser says if several hundred thousand signatures are turned in in only a few days, the Legislature, which has the power to limit Newsom’s powers, will be very afraid. It only takes 1.4 million signatures to recall the governor.

https://californiaglobe.com/section-...ntact-tracing/
__________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine

A lie doesn't become truth, a wrong doesn't become right, and Evil doesn't become good, just because it is accepted by the majority. - Booker T Washington
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GetAClue For This Useful Post:
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2020, 07:25 AM
GetAClue's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Ohio
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,879
Thanks: 8,382
Thanked 5,909 Times in 3,389 Posts
Default Re: The Miserable Pseudo-Science Behind Face Masks, Social Distancing And Contact Tra

This is a printout of the first part of the article that was referenced in the main article. It is also at the same link, but at the bottom of the page.
Quote:
California Globe is copying the entire Technocracy News article into our, in case it disappears. Technocracy News invites you to copy it, print it out this report and deliver it to every political leader, every commercial establishment, all family and friends, etc.:

The Miserable Pseudo-Science Behind Face Masks, Social Distancing And Contact Tracing

Once upon a time, there was something called science. It included the discovery of truth about nature, the elements, the universe, etc. It was practiced by honest and accountable practitioners called scientists and engineers. They often invented cool new things as a result of their studies, but generally they had no primal urge to use their knowledge to dominate other people, groups or even entire societies.

Then certain other scientists and engineers rose up and made a discovery of their own. If true science was ever-so-slightly skewed and engineering disciplines were applied to society at large, then they could indeed use their “knowledge” to dominate and control other people, groups, entire societies or even, heaven forbid, the entire planet.

The first group pursued science. The second group pursued pseudo-science.

Merriam-Webster defines pseudo-science as “a system of theories, assumptions, and methods erroneously regarded as scientific.” The Oxford dictionary clarifies by stating, “a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method.“

Pseudo-science quickly emerged as the principal domain of Technocrats, but they soon found that scientific debate with those promoting real science was most inconvenient to their social engineering goals. The solution was simple: claim that their own pseudo-science was indeed the real science, and then refuse debate by excluding all other voices to the contrary.

In the context of pseudo-science, this report will examine the three primary tools of fighting COVID-19: face masks, social distancing and contact tracing.

Face masks
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) website plainly states that cloth face masks “Will not protect the wearer against airborne transmissible infectious agents due to loose fit and lack of seal or inadequate filtration.”

But, what about surgical masks? OHSA is clear here also that they “will not protect the wearer against airborne transmissible infectious agents due to loose fit and lack of seal or inadequate filtration.”

But then right under these statements, OSHA furiously backpedaled by adding an FAQ section on COVID-19 directly underneath and stated,

OSHA generally recommends that employers encourage workers to wear face coverings at work. Face coverings are intended to prevent wearers who have Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) without knowing it (i.e., those who are asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic) from spreading potentially infectious respiratory droplets to others. This is known as source control.

Consistent with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendation for all people to wear cloth face coverings when in public and around other people, wearing cloth face coverings, if appropriate for the work environment and job tasks, conserves other types of personal protective equipment (PPE), such as surgical masks, for healthcare settings where such equipment is needed most.

So, wearing a face mask cannot protect you from getting COVID, but it is supposedly able to keep someone else from getting it from you? OSHA is speaking out of both sides of its mouth. What it calls “source control” likely puts the real motive out in the open: since you are the source, it’s about controlling YOU. There is no true scientific rationale for anyone but the sick and medical workers to wear masks.

The truly healthy have no business wearing a mask, period.

But, what about asymptomatic carriers?

On June 8, 2020, Maria Van Herkhove, PhD., head of the World Health Organization’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit released a compilation of a number of contact tracing programs from various nations and plainly stated “From the data we have, it still seems to be very rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual.”

This writer hates to think what happened to Dr. Herkhove overnight at the hands of her WHO handlers, because the next day she also furiously backpedaled and stated “I used the phrase ‘very rare,’ and I think that that’s misunderstanding to state that asymptomatic transmission globally is very rare. I was referring to a small subset of studies.”

It is clear that Dr. Herkhove’s first statement that naively repeated the clear facts of the matter did not follow the WHO’s justification for non-infectious people to wear masks. In fact, the entire mask wearing narrative hangs on the single pseudo-scientific idea that asymptomatic people can spread the virus.

In a recent Technocracy News article authored by highly-respected neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock, MD titled Face Masks Pose Serious Risks To The Healthy, he concluded, “there is insufficient evidence that wearing a mask of any kind can have a significant impact in preventing the spread of this virus.” (Blaylock represents real science.)

Nevertheless, in the face of clear evidence of the worthlessness of face masks for preventing disease,
  • States and municipalities are mandating that face masks be worn by all citizens when outside their home
  • Large and small companies are forcing their employees to wear masks
  • People at large are scared to death to not wear a face mask for fear of getting sick or being mask-shamed by others if they take it off.
A Matter of Oxygen
Face masks lower the percentage of oxygen available for inhaling.


Normal fresh air contains 20.95% oxygen. OSHA defines an oxygen deficient atmosphere as an “atmosphere with an oxygen content below 19.5% by volume.” The reason we breath air is only for our lungs to harvest the oxygen it contains so that we don’t suffocate and die.

OSHA documents the effects of the first level of oxygen deficiency from 16% to 19.5%:

At concentrations of 16 to 19.5 percent, workers engaged in any form of exertion can rapidly become symptomatic as their tissues fail to obtain the oxygen necessary to function properly (Rom, W., Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2nd ed.; Little, Brown; Boston, 1992). Increased breathing rates, accelerated heartbeat, and impaired thinking or coordination occur more quickly in an oxygen-deficient environment. Even a momentary loss of coordination may be devastating to a worker if it occurs while the worker is performing a potentially dangerous activity, such as climbing a ladder.

This writer has already encountered several store employees, forced to wear a face mask during work hours, who exhibit one or more of these exact symptoms. When asked if they relate their symptoms to wearing the mask, every single one has emphatically said “Yes!”.

Every employer and government entity that mandates the wearing of face masks are required to do two things: first, they must provide atmospheric testing to each person to measure average oxygen levels inside the mask when it is being worn and second, if oxygen is below 19.5%, they must be provided with an oxygen enriched breathing system.

To this writer’s knowledge, there has been zero testing of oxygen levels anywhere in the country even though it is plainly clear that many people are experiencing symptoms of oxygen deficiency.

Many state-level politicians are now mandating the wearing of face masks for all citizens in public places. That they have fallen prey to pseudo-science is now putting entire populations at risk for physical harm that has nothing to do with the COVID-19 virus.

Social Distancing
Adding to the fear of contagion, people across the nation are driven to practice social distancing, or staying 6 feet apart at all times. This is practiced to excess in almost every commercial establishment with markers taped or painted on the floor and shopping isles converted into one-way travel only.

Yet, two real scientists at the University of Oxford in Britain, Professors Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson, wrote in The Telegraph (UK) recently that “the two-metre rule has no basis in science.” Their article was titled There is no scientific evidence to support the disastrous two-metre rule.

According to these scientists,

The influential Lancet review provided evidence from 172 studies in support of physical distancing of one metre or more. This might sound impressive, but all the studies were retrospective and suffer from biases that undermine the reliability of their findings. Recall bias arises in research when participants do not remember previous events accurately, and it is problematic when studies look back in time at how people behaved, including how closely they stood from others.

More concerning was that only five of the 172 studies reported specifically on Covid exposure and proximity with infection. These studies included a total of merely 477 patients, with just 26 actual cases of infection. In only one study was a specific distance measure reported: “came within six feet of the index patient”. The result showed no effect of distance on contracting Covid.


Heneghan and Jefferson further noted,

On further independent inspection of 15 studies included in the review, we found multiple inconsistencies in the data, numerical mistakes and unsound methods in 13 of them. When assumptions over distance were made, we could not replicate any of them.

This is the hallmark of modern pseudo-science: inconsistencies in the data, numerical mistakes, unsound methods and inability to replicate results.

What is the real purpose of social distancing? It certainly is not to curtail contagion. The only other possibility is to curtail economic activity and prevent social cohesion. Humans are social beings, after all, and lack of close proximity leads to depression, anxiety and even serious health consequences.
__________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine

A lie doesn't become truth, a wrong doesn't become right, and Evil doesn't become good, just because it is accepted by the majority. - Booker T Washington
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2020, 07:26 AM
GetAClue's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Ohio
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,879
Thanks: 8,382
Thanked 5,909 Times in 3,389 Posts
Default Re: The Miserable Pseudo-Science Behind Face Masks, Social Distancing And Contact Tra

Page 2
Quote:
Contact Tracing
Contact tracing is an established practice in modern medicine. It is useful for the early stages of serious infectious diseases like Ebola, tuberculosis and sexually transmitted diseases like chlamydia.

Every credible expert on contact tracing says that it is effective only up to the point of mass distribution. In other words, during the early stages of a contagion or a slow moving or very serious disease.

In the case of COVID-19, the horse has already left the barn. Except to harass people, there is nothing useful that contact tracing can accomplish.

Yet, almost every state in America is implementing a wide-ranging contact tracing program that may ultimately employ some 300,000 tracers.

The Center for Disease Control website states that “Contact tracing will be conducted for close contacts (any individual within 6 feet of an infected person for at least 15 minutes) of laboratory-confirmed or probable COVID-19 patients.

Furthermore, CDC complete definition of “close contact” is,

Someone who was within 6 feet of an infected person for at least 15 minutes starting from 2 days before illness onset (or, for asymptomatic patients, 2 days prior to specimen collection) until the time the patient is isolated.

If you are “exposed” to such a person, your personal information will be collected and you will be contacted by the “tracer” to be instructed to quarantine for up to two weeks. The infected person could have been mistaken about having contact with you. They could be someone who just wants to get you in trouble. If you live in Washington state, where all restaurants are now required to record the contact information of every patron, you might not have a clue who was infected, but you will be quarantined anyway.

Now, the CDC’s declaration of “6 feet” above takes us back to social distancing, where we just learned above that there is “no effect of distance on contracting COVID” in the first place.

Thus, find that contact tracing misses the mark on two main points: first, the virus is too widespread throughout the population to make tracing effective and second, the criteria of six feet for defining a “contact” is bogus.

So, why are governors, mayors and health departments ramping up for a nationwide exercise in obtrusive contact tracing? Again, pursuing a path of pseudo-science, the intended outcome is control over people.

Conclusion
The American public is being spoon-fed a steady diet of pseudo-science in order to justify the wearing of face masks, social distancing and contact tracing. Yet, the actual science points in the polar opposite direction.

Furthermore, those who try to present the real science are shamed, ridiculed and bullied for having such narrow-minded views.

This is a clear sign of Technocrats-at-work. Instead, these are the ones who should be exposed, shamed and ridiculed.

In sum, these dangerous and destructive policies are designed to curtail economic activity, break down social cohesion and control people. Moreover, they fit the original mission statement of Technocracy as far back as 1938:

Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population…


It is highly doubtful that most state and local leaders understand the lack of real and verified science behind their actions and mandates. Nevertheless, they are implementing policies that are destructive to our economic system, harmful to our personal health and ruinous to personal liberty.

This writer suggests that you print multiple copies of this report and deliver it to every political leader, every commercial establishment, all family and friends, etc.
__________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine

A lie doesn't become truth, a wrong doesn't become right, and Evil doesn't become good, just because it is accepted by the majority. - Booker T Washington
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2020, 03:11 PM
saltwn's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Esto perpetua
Posts: 82,496
Thanks: 55,866
Thanked 26,417 Times in 18,919 Posts
Send a message via AIM to saltwn Send a message via MSN to saltwn Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: The Miserable Pseudo-Science Behind Face Masks, Social Distancing And Contact Tra

Quote:
Originally Posted by GetAClue View Post
This is a pretty long read, but it is worth it if you are interested in the truth.




https://californiaglobe.com/section-...ntact-tracing/
herd immunity is when everyone or a huge majority get vaccinated
the masks/distancing works as evidenced by when we dont do it the virus spikes
__________________
Happy 100th Birthday, Lois Dickenson Malone!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2020, 04:11 PM
Scholar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,823
Thanks: 370
Thanked 2,120 Times in 1,267 Posts
Default Re: The Miserable Pseudo-Science Behind Face Masks, Social Distancing And Contact Tra

Quote:
Originally Posted by saltwn View Post
herd immunity is when everyone or a huge majority get vaccinated
the masks/distancing works as evidenced by when we dont do it the virus spikes
Incorrect. Herd immunity is when a majority have developed an immunity to the virus or disease. Two ways to accomplish, vaccination or exposure. Unfortunately, the masks have been shown to be nothing more than a placebo. Distancing should, sorry, be a normal practice anyway. If you are closer than six feet to another person you have become a physical threat as well as a possible vector.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to loboloco For This Useful Post:
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2020, 04:55 PM
saltwn's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Esto perpetua
Posts: 82,496
Thanks: 55,866
Thanked 26,417 Times in 18,919 Posts
Send a message via AIM to saltwn Send a message via MSN to saltwn Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: The Miserable Pseudo-Science Behind Face Masks, Social Distancing And Contact Tra

Quote:
Originally Posted by loboloco View Post
Incorrect. Herd immunity is when a majority have developed an immunity to the virus or disease. Two ways to accomplish, vaccination or exposure. Unfortunately, the masks have been shown to be nothing more than a placebo. Distancing should, sorry, be a normal practice anyway. If you are closer than six feet to another person you have become a physical threat as well as a possible vector.
funny that didn't work with the plague that killed two thirds of England
staying away from the infected till the cause was found and eliminated probably saved that one third whose lives were changed forever
__________________
Happy 100th Birthday, Lois Dickenson Malone!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-28-2020, 10:35 AM
Scholar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,823
Thanks: 370
Thanked 2,120 Times in 1,267 Posts
Default Re: The Miserable Pseudo-Science Behind Face Masks, Social Distancing And Contact Tra

Quote:
Originally Posted by saltwn View Post
funny that didn't work with the plague that killed two thirds of England
staying away from the infected till the cause was found and eliminated probably saved that one third whose lives were changed forever
No social distancing in medieval England. Also, vastly different vectors. Fleas don't really care about either masks or distancing.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-28-2020, 11:30 PM
saltwn's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Esto perpetua
Posts: 82,496
Thanks: 55,866
Thanked 26,417 Times in 18,919 Posts
Send a message via AIM to saltwn Send a message via MSN to saltwn Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: The Miserable Pseudo-Science Behind Face Masks, Social Distancing And Contact Tra

Quote:
Originally Posted by loboloco View Post
No social distancing in medieval England. Also, vastly different vectors. Fleas don't really care about either masks or distancing.
yes there was social distancing. the afflicted were locked in their homes and nailed shut. people would patrol to drag back the escapees.

they did not know it was fleas till much later.

people who brought food or tended to the sick wore these:




and those medieval masks worked.
*We know this is a virus but not its properties. a cloth or industrial mask will filter your tiny nose and mouth droplets.
__________________
Happy 100th Birthday, Lois Dickenson Malone!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2020, 06:45 AM
GetAClue's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Ohio
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,879
Thanks: 8,382
Thanked 5,909 Times in 3,389 Posts
Default Re: The Miserable Pseudo-Science Behind Face Masks, Social Distancing And Contact Tra

Quote:
Originally Posted by saltwn View Post
herd immunity is when everyone or a huge majority get vaccinated
the masks/distancing works as evidenced by when we dont do it the virus spikes
Once again you show up in a thread and spew nonsense without bothering to educate yourself on the facts.
__________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine

A lie doesn't become truth, a wrong doesn't become right, and Evil doesn't become good, just because it is accepted by the majority. - Booker T Washington
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GetAClue For This Useful Post:
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2020, 12:54 PM
saltwn's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Esto perpetua
Posts: 82,496
Thanks: 55,866
Thanked 26,417 Times in 18,919 Posts
Send a message via AIM to saltwn Send a message via MSN to saltwn Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: The Miserable Pseudo-Science Behind Face Masks, Social Distancing And Contact Tra

Quote:
Originally Posted by GetAClue View Post
Once again you show up in a thread and spew nonsense without bothering to educate yourself on the facts.
this used to be a better forum till haters took over
__________________
Happy 100th Birthday, Lois Dickenson Malone!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
and, behind, contact, distancing, face, masks, miserable, pseudoscience, social, the, tracing

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0