A real 'gun control' can of worms. - Page 2

saltwn · #11 (**permalink**) 12-16-2019, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeerleader

This is going to get a bit technical, no way around it.

The ATF is having an enforcement problem when it comes to AR platform rifles.

Everyone knows that only the lower receiver is considered the “firearm”; that is the part that has the serial number on it, that is the part that requires the background check.

..
.

so he can buy blasting caps and fuses but not the actual bomb parts.
So what does he need blasting caps and fuses for?

Dog Man · #12 (**permalink**) 12-16-2019, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saltwn

so he can buy blasting caps and fuses but not the actual bomb parts.
So what does he need blasting caps and fuses for?

porch pirates

saltwn · #13 (**permalink**) 12-16-2019, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dog Man

porch pirates

there you have it then; no need. no can o worms

Jeerleader · #14 (**permalink**) 12-16-2019, 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saltwn

so he can buy blasting caps and fuses but not the actual bomb parts.
So what does he need blasting caps and fuses for?

Dog Man · #15 (**permalink**) 12-17-2019, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeerleader

I have a dog that looks just like that. she needs that cool headband though.

loboloco · #16 (**permalink**) 12-17-2019, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saltwn

so he can buy blasting caps and fuses but not the actual bomb parts.
So what does he need blasting caps and fuses for?

Well, he could be into rocketry. Or he could be using them in non-lethal ways to spook off annoyance animals. Or he could just want to pop them in his yard.

Manitou · #17 (**permalink**) 12-17-2019, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loboloco

Well, he could be into rocketry. Or he could be using them in non-lethal ways to spook off annoyance animals. Or he could just want to pop them in his yard.

Personally I would answer to any moron asking me about blasting caps and such, "Because it's none of your business if I'm not committing a crime."

Jeerleader · #18 (**permalink**) 12-17-2019, 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loboloco

Well, he could be into rocketry. Or he could be using them in non-lethal ways to spook off annoyance animals. Or he could just want to pop them in his yard.

Why even entertain her ridiculous inapplicable analogy as a reasonable discussion point?

It has no relevance to the facts of the case nor any possible usefulness.

FrancSevin · #19 (**permalink**) 12-18-2019, 08:33 AM

Salty's irrelevant hilarity aside,,,;
The only reason the government would want to disarm the citizens after 245 years is because they want to do something for which WE THE PEOPLE would shoot them.

Ya know,,,,, Like refuse to accept the results of a national election.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

The Following User Says Thank You to Jeerleader For This Useful Post:
Dog Man

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to FrancSevin For This Useful Post:
GetAClue, Jeerleader, Manitou