Once again you deflect.

If there is no way to get rid of voter fraud then it is somehow acceptable? If it is "acceptable" can we therefore be reckless in how we go about elections?

WTH,,; why then have them at all?

__________________
I am going to hang a Batman Costume in my closet. .......... Just to screw with myself when I get alzheimer's.
sola gratia, sola fide, sola scriptura.

I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN, I AM A FREEMAN, THE DEMOCRATS WORST NIGHTMARE

Once again you come up with another bogus contention.....


I NEVER said voter fraud was acceptable.....

Your question is moot...

It's not good but, it exists and always has.....

Deal with reality more often and you won't get so poutraged with things that can't be "fixed".....

Of course you didn't say it. You said " there is no way to get rid of voter fraud...."
Implying, in the context of your post, that we should except it as fact, at the very least.

Your argument is one of semantics.
Typical liberal deflctive sh!t.



I'm saying "no," we should not except that it will always exist. And that we should not employ methods that allow it. Mail voting is proven rife with fraud from both sides of the aisle.

Voting is a right, not a privilege. You have the "right" to exercise it. Whilst there are special reasons to have alternatives, the government has no need to facilitate it for those who won't put forth the energy to do it "In Person" simply as an excuse for the preventing voter suppression. Absentee ballots and mail in ballots are historically rife with fraud. In person voting is how you "fix" it!

__________________
I am going to hang a Batman Costume in my closet. .......... Just to screw with myself when I get alzheimer's.
sola gratia, sola fide, sola scriptura.

I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN, I AM A FREEMAN, THE DEMOCRATS WORST NIGHTMARE

give me a link to absentee ballots being rife with fraud.

__________________

masked, social, it is TIME for each individual to have a space heater

So why put policies in place to make it easier to commit voter fraud? Frank is correct. If you want to secure your vote, show up at the polling station and cast it.

__________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine

A lie doesn't become truth, a wrong doesn't become right, and Evil doesn't become good, just because it is accepted by the majority. - Booker T Washington

You should educate yourself on the topic at hand if you want to be taken seriously. This is NOT about absentee voting.

__________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine

A lie doesn't become truth, a wrong doesn't become right, and Evil doesn't become good, just because it is accepted by the majority. - Booker T Washington

__________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine

A lie doesn't become truth, a wrong doesn't become right, and Evil doesn't become good, just because it is accepted by the majority. - Booker T Washington

Once again, you are incorrect. Absentee ballots must be requested, by law.
Mail in ballots are not required to be requested, and can be mailed to the last known address of a registree without their prior knowledge.

Excuse me, I did not refer to absentee ballots. I was referring to mail in ballots.

To get an absentee ballot one must prove authenticity of the request and the election board must send ONE ballot in that persons name to the known address. It has ONE security code attached to that name. It can be monitored.
Shotgun blast of blank ballots require less verification going out. And far less verification coming back. Finally there is no secure chain of custody. So, with no authenticity of proper possession it is easy to stuff ballots, or destroy them.

However, since you asked there are two notable links. Here's one
https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/04/...il-in-ballots/

The other is found in the FRIGGIN OP OF THIS TREAD

TO WIT:
Both Jackson, 48, and Mendez, 45, were charged with fraud in casting mail-in votes, unauthorized possession of ballots, tampering with public records and falsifying or tampering with records, according to the statement. Mendez was additionally charged with election fraud and false registration or transfer.

__________________
I am going to hang a Batman Costume in my closet. .......... Just to screw with myself when I get alzheimer's.
sola gratia, sola fide, sola scriptura.

I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN, I AM A FREEMAN, THE DEMOCRATS WORST NIGHTMARE

Absentee ballots are sent by request of the voter. Mail in voting has every voter on the roll receiving a ballot in the mail. Doesn't matter if you haven't voted in a couple of elections or have moved, etc. The NJ election was strictly mail in there were no polling places open. It's not the same as absentee ballots.

__________________
If Democrats were confident their nominee actually received more than 80 million votes they wouldn't have more troops occupying Washington, DC than Lincoln had defending the city during the Civil War. Not Joe Biden, Kim Jung Biden.