Again getting back to my assessment...

The guy's joke says they are dead.
DOES NOT give any insinuation as to how they became dead.

By this logic, if somebody says to a gay person (or sinner in general) that God will judge them, then obviously that's meant as a death threat...



It's really easy to say something is there that is not there.
You have claimed this multiple times, but it doesn't make it any less of a lie.


Yeah. He did. A very bad one nonetheless.
Gun enthusiasts sometimes say that you can take the gun from their cold dead fingers.
So that can be done...

I think the real problem here is that the gun culture (like NRA fear-mongering) has an innate level of violence inbred and therefore they are seeing this from their own perspective.
It's not an issue that the threat of murder is actually there, but you guys see it there because any talk of taking guns is a threat to you guys.



Gun enthusiasts sometimes say that you can take the gun from their cold dead fingers.
So that can be done...
It's essentially a joke at taking the claim as an offer that you agreed we could have your gun after you were dead.

Again, bad joke, but it's there.


Again, nowhere in his speech does he talk about violence to acquire guns.
But you guys want to assume that...


First of all
Seriously. You need to reread your words and take them as your own guidance.
THIS WHOLE THREAD is about gun enthusiasts assuming intentions or motives about this guy's words. You guys are acting as mind-readers to assume something he did not say.

And then you have the gall to accuse others of that???


Secondly, if you can explicitly point out what you are talking about where I did that, I'm all ears.
Until then, this is a hollow accusation.

__________________
“Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.”
~Abraham Lincoln

I had hoped that when the truth was exposed, you would do the genuine thing in coming clean.
Instead, you perpetuate this obfuscation misdirection.

I'm talking about the subject line YOU POSTED.
Democrat Candidate Jokes About Killing People Who Oppose Gun Confiscation
That is a blatant lie.


obfuscation misdirection.
Was I talking about the applause?
No.

But when I point out the subject line was a lie, you try to change the subject.


IT DOES NOT SOUND LIKE THAT
Jesus. Then you perpetuate the damn lie.

He talked about people being dead.
NOWHERE did he intimate HOW they died.

Again, to ask you the same question...
Does that mean that anytime somebody talks about another person being dead, that it's logical to assume that it's actually a death threat???


You guys still fail at comprehending what was actually the "joke".

Gun enthusiasts sometimes state: "You can take my gun from my cold, dead fingers"
It is an obvious threat against theft.
Instead of treating it as a threat against theft, this guy treated it as an offer.

Like saying "You can have my room after I go to college".
Okay. After you are dead, you said I could have your gun!

It's a bad joke, but it's not joking about murder.


Jesus.
You guys are so caught up in assuming threats and violence. Boogeymen around every damn corner.

__________________
“Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.”
~Abraham Lincoln