Political Wrinkles

Political Wrinkles (http://www.politicalwrinkles.com/)
-   Elections (http://www.politicalwrinkles.com/elections/)
-   -   Shields and Brooks on the election's 'parity of sleaze' (http://www.politicalwrinkles.com/elections/48600-shields-brooks-elections-parity-sleaze.html)

saltwn 10-29-2016 02:40 AM

Shields and Brooks on the election's 'parity of sleaze'
 

Republicans don't want a landslide so they can try to keep the senate

300 H and H 10-29-2016 07:24 AM

Re: Shields and Brooks on the election's 'parity of sleaze'
 
Just another reason to defund public broad casting. :mad

It is owned by the left wing, and adds credibility to the left wing liars. :mad

Fuq you lefties and your corruption of all that is sacred. May you rot in hell. :thumbsup

Regards, Kirk

cnredd 10-29-2016 11:03 AM

Re: Shields and Brooks on the election's 'parity of sleaze'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 300 H and H (Post 847479)
Fuq you lefties and your corruption of all that is sacred. May you rot in hell. :thumbsup

Regards, Kirk

Seriously...You need to switch to decaf...:(

zoriolus 10-29-2016 12:00 PM

Re: Shields and Brooks on the election's 'parity of sleaze'
 
That interview was arrogant, condescending, and "sleazy".

saltwn 10-29-2016 01:15 PM

Re: Shields and Brooks on the election's 'parity of sleaze'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 300 H and H (Post 847479)
Just another reason to defund public broad casting. :mad

It is owned by the left wing, and adds credibility to the left wing liars. :mad

Fuq you lefties and your corruption of all that is sacred. May you rot in hell. :thumbsup

Regards, Kirk

In fact we should also publicly fund elections is that what you're saying?
I do agree with that; that way at least we hear a little bias , not a whole truckload :thumbsup

zoriolus 10-29-2016 02:18 PM

Re: Shields and Brooks on the election's 'parity of sleaze'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 300 H and H (Post 847479)
Just another reason to defund public broad casting. :mad

It is owned by the left wing, and adds credibility to the left wing liars. :mad

Fuq you lefties and your corruption of all that is sacred. May you rot in hell. :thumbsup

Regards, Kirk

NPR and PBS have their own sleazy history. Didn't Nina Totenberg try to submarine Clarence Thomas with the Anita Hill story days before his confirmation hearing? I'm not sure if our tax dollars funded that or not.

saltwn 10-29-2016 02:31 PM

Re: Shields and Brooks on the election's 'parity of sleaze'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by zoriolus (Post 847521)
NPR and PBS have their own sleazy history. Didn't Nina Totenberg try to submarine Clarence Thomas with the Anita Hill story days before his confirmation hearing? I'm not sure if our tax dollars funded that or not.

so many straight lines in that :slapme :p
but seriously thank God for Anita Hill and sexual harassment laws.:thumbsup


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0