Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > Political Forums > Elections
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Elections Discuss Scaring Seniors at the Political Forums; Scaring Seniors An Obama-Biden ad says McCain supports "cutting benefits in half" for Social Security recipients. False! Summary A new ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2008, 10:46 PM
cnredd's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,389
Thanks: 202
Thanked 1,977 Times in 1,478 Posts
Default Scaring Seniors

Scaring Seniors

Quote:
An Obama-Biden ad says McCain supports "cutting benefits in half" for Social Security recipients. False!

Summary

A new Obama ad characterizes the "Bush-McCain privatization plan" as "cutting Social Security Benefits in half." This is a falsehood sure to frighten seniors who rely on their Social Security checks. In truth, McCain does not propose to cut those checks at all.

The ad refers to a Bush proposal from 2005 to hold down the growth of benefits for future retirees. Compared to the buying power of benefits paid to today's retirees, that would not have been a "cut" for anybody. It would have been a "cut" of half only in relation to benefits now promised to retirees who have yet to be born. And for average workers, that "cut" in 2075 was projected by one of Obama's own economic advisers to be 28 percent, not "half."
Remember...It was Obama himself that told us the Republicans were fearmongers...

As a side note, I found this passage terribly pathetic...This shows hows sad ads can be when it comes to "outsourcing" facts...

Quote:
The Obama-Biden campaign attempts to document their "cutting benefits in half" claim by citing a report by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities written by Jason Furman, who is currently one of Obama's top economic advisers. This won't do. What Furman's study actually says is quite different from what the ad claims.
Can you believe that?...

Obama uses one of his OWN ADVISERS as a source for the public to believe...and doesn't even get THAT right!...
__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2008, 10:58 PM
saltwn's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: small town in the Northwest- population 400 (+2)
Posts: 5,165
Thanks: 2,466
Thanked 1,472 Times in 1,024 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: Scaring Seniors

McCain would privatize Social Security. What would have happened this week if that had already been done?
__________________


________________________________________
Salty

THANKSGIVING MENUS AND TIPS

A GREAT PLACE TO SHOP
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to saltwn For This Useful Post:
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2008, 11:13 PM
cnredd's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,389
Thanks: 202
Thanked 1,977 Times in 1,478 Posts
Default Re: Scaring Seniors

Quote:
Originally Posted by saltwn View Post
McCain would privatize Social Security. What would have happened this week if that had already been done?
Ugh!...

ONCE AGAIN....

Bush's plan for privitazing A SMALL PART of Social Security (another fear tactic being used is that it exchanges Social Security for stocks - which is FALSE) are for those born AFTER 1950...

And since NO ONE is a senior citizen right now born AFTER 1950 (58 year olds are not senior citizens)...then that means that NO ONE would've had their Social Security impacting their checks with "what happened this week"...

NO ONE...ZIP...ZILCH...NADA....
__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2008, 11:44 PM
saltwn's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: small town in the Northwest- population 400 (+2)
Posts: 5,165
Thanks: 2,466
Thanked 1,472 Times in 1,024 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: Scaring Seniors

And Social Security privatization is a moot argument anyway. The congress and Washington have been robbing it blind for years and now with the economic crises, it's sure to be on the blood letting list once again.
__________________


________________________________________
Salty

THANKSGIVING MENUS AND TIPS

A GREAT PLACE TO SHOP
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2008, 03:15 AM
cnredd's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,389
Thanks: 202
Thanked 1,977 Times in 1,478 Posts
Default Re: Scaring Seniors

Quote:
Originally Posted by saltwn View Post
And Social Security privatization is a moot argument anyway. The congress and Washington have been robbing it blind for years and now with the economic crises, it's sure to be on the blood letting list once again.
If it's so moot than you'd agree that it shouldn't be used as a basis for lies by the Democratic presidential candidate...

Right?...
__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2008, 03:25 AM
Mikeyy's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southern California
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,852
Thanks: 544
Thanked 1,153 Times in 829 Posts
Default Re: Scaring Seniors

Salty wins the point. Social Security is suppose to help retirees regardless of the market. There ain't enough money blowing out of Bush's butt for that.
__________________
Talking about music is like dancing about architecture
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2008, 03:38 AM
cnredd's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,389
Thanks: 202
Thanked 1,977 Times in 1,478 Posts
Default Re: Scaring Seniors

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeyy View Post
Salty wins the point. Social Security is suppose to help retirees regardless of the market. There ain't enough money blowing out of Bush's butt for that.
False statement...

EVERY (That's right...I said "EVERY") 5 year and/or 10 year period you'd like to choose from the introduction of Social Security on has had a HIGHER rate of return than Social Security's measly 2%...

In EVERY case putting a small percentage of your money into the stocks instead of giving it to the government for them to create IOUs has GAINED more money than just putting it into Social Security as is MANDATED...
__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2008, 06:01 AM
saltwn's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: small town in the Northwest- population 400 (+2)
Posts: 5,165
Thanks: 2,466
Thanked 1,472 Times in 1,024 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: Scaring Seniors

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeyy View Post
Salty wins the point. Social Security is suppose to help retirees regardless of the market. There ain't enough money blowing out of Bush's butt for that.

You made me spit out my cigarette.
__________________


________________________________________
Salty

THANKSGIVING MENUS AND TIPS

A GREAT PLACE TO SHOP
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2008, 06:11 AM
saltwn's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: small town in the Northwest- population 400 (+2)
Posts: 5,165
Thanks: 2,466
Thanked 1,472 Times in 1,024 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: Scaring Seniors

Quote:
Originally Posted by cnredd View Post
False statement...

EVERY (That's right...I said "EVERY") 5 year and/or 10 year period you'd like to choose from the introduction of Social Security on has had a HIGHER rate of return than Social Security's measly 2%...

In EVERY case putting a small percentage of your money into the stocks instead of giving it to the government for them to create IOUs has GAINED more money than just putting it into Social Security as is MANDATED...
The thing is, that's a good theory. But when you depend on Social Security you think no. I'll stick with the old 2%
Besides, there was mention of how to handle it. Put it in a portfolio handled by some financial entity is one point that hits pragmatic seniors like a scam. And even if a person could manage their own stock preferences, you over look some of the reasons for Social Security in the first place.
That is many people can't put back a lot of savings and others won't. Stock markets are risky business for the little guy to handle and he doesn't trust handing the responsibility over.
Maybe when you get to be 65 and say you (hope not) had a catastrophe or economic down turn for your savings, and you are soley depending on that little check and medicare that they took out all these years-you make that decision. Baby boomers moms and grandpas lived through the depression and some of that generation is with us still. We are not as trusting.
__________________


________________________________________
Salty

THANKSGIVING MENUS AND TIPS

A GREAT PLACE TO SHOP

Last edited by saltwn; 09-22-2008 at 06:12 AM. Reason: spl
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2008, 10:36 AM
faithful_servant's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Beautiful conservative Central Oregon
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,383
Thanks: 160
Thanked 308 Times in 259 Posts
Default Re: Scaring Seniors

Even the lowest risk/return investments return better than the lousy ~2% that SS returns. I can put my money into a passbook savings account @3.25% today and do better than that. And that's federally insured money. Ultra-low risk investments run between 3-4% and that's substantially better than what SS is returning right now. Limit where people can invest the money to ultra-low risk stocks and you'd be outperforming SS, giving people a MORE secure retirement, you'd be taking the money out of the control of the Feds. and taking away a way for them to spend money they don't really have, and you'd be putting money into the private sector where it can grow the economy, instead of the Fed. debt.
__________________
~
~
~

Our nation has not always lived up to its ideals, yet those ideals have never ceased to guide us. They expose our flaws, and lead us to mend them. We are the beneficiaries of the work of the generations before us and it is each generation's responsibility to continue that work. - Laura Bush

God is a conservative -

Ecclesiastes 10:2--"A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Search Engine Optimization and SEO Tools
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0