The bogus Sarah Palin Banned Books List

I wonder how Obama feels knowing he's "so sincere" about fighting a clean race while every person around him won't listen...Not even the moderators at his own website which allow people to throw mud first without checking instead of having their posts set in a queue so the moderators can decide if a blog is out of line...

Change you can believe in...

__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd

Thats what I'm talking about. International experience. Another post that supports Sarah for POTUS.

__________________
Talking about music is like dancing about architecture

Snopes also dispels the rumor there was a list of books but does go on to say:

__________________
Frugal tip: To keep potatoes from budding, place an apple in the bag with the potatoes.

How to Fold a Shirt

Salty's Blog

Say whaaaa????

So now Barack's responsible for individual posters on his forum???


And if somebody posts something false, then "every person around Barack" isn't listening to Barack???

Wow. Imagine if we applied those standards here...

Your link is dead now, so it looks like they got to it.
Can we hold McCain responsible for the same type of crap?

I reported it to the site moderators. I am sure they deleted it.

__________________
Jesus Was A Liberal

If a certain course of action makes the mouth-breathers furious, then that’s a good policy. – The Practical Environmentalist

Nope. Sen. Obama's machine is responsible for it. The same machine that got him elected to Congress and the same machine that got him the Dem. nomination - the DNC. They can control what's goes on thier website, the same as cnredd can. But, they have chosen to do what redd has done and allow people to post stupid crap whenever they want to. The difference is that cnredd isn't running for POTUS and Sen. Obama is. The difference is that this forum is about bringing together different opinons and Sen. Obama's site is about Sen. Obama.

__________________
~
~
~

Our nation has not always lived up to its ideals, yet those ideals have never ceased to guide us. They expose our flaws, and lead us to mend them. We are the beneficiaries of the work of the generations before us and it is each generation's responsibility to continue that work. - Laura Bush

God is a conservative -

Ecclesiastes 10:2--"A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left."

Only after taking a public opinion poll, consulting with the UN and checking their Tarot cards....

__________________
~
~
~

Our nation has not always lived up to its ideals, yet those ideals have never ceased to guide us. They expose our flaws, and lead us to mend them. We are the beneficiaries of the work of the generations before us and it is each generation's responsibility to continue that work. - Laura Bush

God is a conservative -

Ecclesiastes 10:2--"A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left."

Thank you...

That's a point that's been whirling in my head the last couple of weeks...

It's not that Obama's campaign invents the bile...It's that they ALLOW it on their own site and feign responsibility when called on it...

Obama has 300 policy advisors and he can't come up with 2 website moderators?...They don't have software which would only let new blogs or posts show up once they've been greenlighted? (The software I use has that option)...

One would THINK (logically, that is), that a presidential candidate would have a website that goes by the thinking "I only want legitimate discussions on the site representing me, so I won't allow people to come by willy-nilly to spout disgusting and unfair claims, accusations, and outright smear...even if their ultimate reasoning is to help me get elected."...

Instead, they play Pontius Pilate and wash their hands of their supporters' actions...

__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd

Nahhh. Too easy...

You do realize that you're talking about a difference between a web-site admin, and ACTUAL POLICY makers.
Moreover, I am really curious as to how much traffic the Obama web-site is generating. I would imagine it would be substantial.
To lay vague blame at "Obama's machine" as if it is somehow meaningful is astounding.

I mean, Corsi PUT OUT A BOOK FILLED with lies and smears.
Whose feet do we lay THAT at?


And there you just jumped from "Obama's machine" to DIRECTLY TALKING about Obama himself.
Do you realize when you make such huge leaps?


Obama's web-site would conceivably cover virtually every aspect of the "Politics" / "Elections" scheme, and every sub-thread that has been touched by the politics.
It's about MORE than just "Obama", and includes the campaign and platform.

For somebody like you who ignores the campaign and platform, I'm not surprised you would miss that detail...


Guilty until proven innocent...
Quite frankly, considering the REAL issues in this election, I would hope that people would not get side-tracked over an online web-forum mechanics.

But hey. If this is the "blame Obama for everything" mentality, I guess that's your freedom of speech.
Last time I checked, no matter how illogical I think that is, it's still allowed and protected.

Just out of curiousity, have EITHER of you taken the time to see if that board has ANTI-OBAMA threads on it?
Possibly discussing Corsi's crap?