![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Donate | PW Store | PW Trivia | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Elections Discuss Gender-baiting at the Political Forums; So now we know what the primary target of the left is in this election - women. They are creating ... |
![]() |
|
|
Share | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| The Following User Says Thank You to faithful_servant For This Useful Post: | ||
|
||||
|
Even if the Left (or the Leftist media) invented the term "Republican War on Women", it's not like women are defensive for no reason. It's not like we heard the term "War on Women" and were like, "My God! The republicans have declared war on us! We'd better vote for Obama again!"
Regardless of what one calls it, we are aware of the rash of anti-woman bills being proposed by republican politicians lately (mostly unsuccessfully, but still). If they want people to stop thinking they're waging war on women, then perhaps they should chill out with the anti-woman legislation, at least for the time being. It's not going to pass anyway, in the current political climate. |
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to 1069 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
||||
|
Might turn out to be a stupid strategy that reeks of desperation. It can define the lines in a way that might not be to there advantage.
If they're not careful they'll be saying - "You stay-at-home-moms, you're not with us. You catholic women, you're not with us. You women who are more interested in the economy, than worrying about getting free condoms, you're not with us, etc." It can exclude, more than unite. They might be unpleasantly surprised how many they exclude. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
ΜΌΛΌΝ ΛΆΒΈ (come and take them) Al Gore didn't invent the internet, but he did invent global warming |
|
||||
|
Actually I've seen those. She posted a list of 10 ways Republicans were warring with women. It was stuff like the motion to defund Planned Parenthood, or something like aborting horses while you wouldn't let them Margaret Singer the black population, or something like that.
Did you see what I did with the stilting the information there at the end of the last sentence. All but one of her links are from the radical left, and they all do that. |
|
||||
|
The imaginative "War on Women" is and already starting to backfire. It will not change Obama winning this November, but in the long run, will hurt the Democrats. Most women are intelligent enough to see right through this sham and do not care to be used as a pawn in some partisan political game.
__________________
"The oldest picture book in our possession is the midnight sky" - E. W. Maunder
|
|
||||
|
I don't think it's so "fake" when the Republicans go after issues that intimately effect women.
I especially don't think it's so fake when they hold hearings on women's contraception and NOT A SINGLE WOMAN is invited to speak. Not one ![]() So is it war on women? Well...that depends. After all, it's the right that insist that the left has an ongoing war on Christians.
__________________
DISCLAIMER: Extreme amounts of sarcasm can possibly result in inflammatory situations. Not responsible for keyboard violence, spittle on the monitor, irrational responses mistaken for momentary brilliance, one-sided rages against hypocrisy or individual members or unintended consequences such as poor personal hygiene and bad spelling. Please fasten your seatbelts and put your trays in an upright position. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Coyote For This Useful Post: | ||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Their war (and I think that is the appropriate term) on Planned Parenthood. The plethora of anti-abortion legislation going on in Republican majority states. The divisive issue on covering contraception in healthcare insurance. When you add to that fact that some of the bombastic big-mouths in their camp (ie Limbaugh) have made clear what they think of women who want contraception....and the GoP has done little to distance themselves from that attitude - what would you think? Personally speaking, easy availability of contraception is very important to me as a woman. I can understand opposition to abortion, though I usually do not agree with it. But I can not understand opposition to contraception. It is not just a religious rights issue - it's evident in other attempts designed to limit a woman's access to contraception. So, what would an intelligent woman think? I, for one, think that labeling this as "gender baiting" is a way of trying to diminish the issue.
__________________
DISCLAIMER: Extreme amounts of sarcasm can possibly result in inflammatory situations. Not responsible for keyboard violence, spittle on the monitor, irrational responses mistaken for momentary brilliance, one-sided rages against hypocrisy or individual members or unintended consequences such as poor personal hygiene and bad spelling. Please fasten your seatbelts and put your trays in an upright position. |
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Coyote For This Useful Post: | ||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I agree, and the repeated suggestion that "intelligent" women "see through" it is merely another attempt by conservatives to diminish women. Intelligent women value their right to reproductive freedom. They recognize the fact that the GOP launches continuous assaults against it, and that these assaults have, in recent months, become not only more blatant but increasingly bizarre, ludicrous, and far-fetched. It seems to me that the GOP legislators introducing half these bills don't have any expectation that they will pass, but merely wish to establish their credentials as extremist conservatives. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to 1069 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
| Tags |
| genderbaiting |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|