Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > Political Forums > Elections
Register FAQDonate Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Elections Discuss Brown vs Coakley at the Political Forums; Independent and party groups were set to spend nearly $5 million on television ads in the final weeks leading up ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2010, 12:42 AM
saltwn's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: town in the Northwest- Home of the National Fiddle Finals!
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,729
Thanks: 8,655
Thanked 4,753 Times in 3,251 Posts
Default Brown vs Coakley

Quote:
Independent and party groups were set to spend nearly $5 million on television ads in the final weeks leading up to Tuesday's special election between state Attorney General Martha Coakley (D) and state Sen. Scott Brown (R)...
...According to ad-buy information provided to the Fix, there are 13 -- yes, 13 -- groups paying for ads in the race's final days...
washingtonpost.com


__________________

I did not win the Powerball again!


"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
--Jonathan Swift
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2010, 12:47 AM
saltwn's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: town in the Northwest- Home of the National Fiddle Finals!
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,729
Thanks: 8,655
Thanked 4,753 Times in 3,251 Posts
Default Re: Brown vs Coakley

From real clear politics:


RealClearPolitics - Election 2010 - Massachusetts Senate - Special Election
__________________

I did not win the Powerball again!


"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
--Jonathan Swift
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2010, 02:20 AM
cnredd's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,367
Thanks: 399
Thanked 5,881 Times in 4,089 Posts
Default Re: Brown vs Coakley

The Dems SHOULD'VE won this in their sleep, but they didn't count on 2 things...

1) The Dems (nationwide) have unexpectedly enegized their opponents more then themselves...

2) The Dems nominated a complete moron (First Kerry, now Coakley...What is it with Massechusetts Dems???? )...

If you'll notice, most of the stuff you see both here on the forums and the outside is NOT what a great guy Brown is...

...But what a dipstick Martha Coakley is...
__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2010, 03:03 AM
cnredd's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,367
Thanks: 399
Thanked 5,881 Times in 4,089 Posts
Default Re: Brown vs Coakley

Quote:
Originally Posted by saltwn View Post
Quote:
Independent and party groups were set to spend nearly $5 million on television ads in the final weeks leading up to Tuesday's special election between state Attorney General Martha Coakley (D) and state Sen. Scott Brown (R)...
washingtonpost.com
if you go further down the article you'll see something VERY interesting...

Quote:
Coakley's ad advantage comes from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which is set to spend $1.4 million on ads in the final week of the race -- a staggering sum given the overwhelming Democratic tilt of the Bay State, and yet another sign of how worried the party is. (The National Republican Senatorial Committee is not running ads in the state.)

The other major Democratic groups in the mix are labor-affiliated. The Service Employees International Union is up with $549,000 in ads, and Citizens for Strength and Security, which is funded by unions, is spending $425,000 on ads.
So out of the $5 million in last minute ads, about 50% come directly from The DNCC (as compared to the NRCC's 0%) and from unions that are using workers' paid dues ()...
__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2010, 03:20 AM
saltwn's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: town in the Northwest- Home of the National Fiddle Finals!
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,729
Thanks: 8,655
Thanked 4,753 Times in 3,251 Posts
Default Re: Brown vs Coakley

Quote:
Originally Posted by cnredd View Post
if you go further down the article you'll see something VERY interesting...

So out of the $5 million in last minute ads, about 50% come directly from The DNCC (as compared to the NRCC's 0%) and from unions that are using workers' paid dues ()...
They should not be worried, but demographics changes and the economy, Obama's bad press over health care work together to make this a race.
If the GOP had the same situation they would send in the big money (situation as in holding on to a slim majority with a party President).
As for union money, I am sure union members are aware they back Democrats.
__________________

I did not win the Powerball again!


"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
--Jonathan Swift
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2010, 10:06 AM
faithful_servant's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Beautiful conservative Central Oregon
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,418
Thanks: 963
Thanked 1,775 Times in 1,348 Posts
Default Re: Brown vs Coakley

Quote:
Originally Posted by saltwn View Post
They should not be worried, but demographics changes and the economy, Obama's bad press over health care work together to make this a race.
If the GOP had the same situation they would send in the big money (situation as in holding on to a slim majority with a party President).
As for union money, I am sure union members are aware they back Democrats.
IT'S NOT ABOUT HOLDING ONTO TO A SLIM MAJORITY, IT'S MAINTAINING TOTAL CONTROL INSTEAD OF ACTAULLY WORKING WITH THE REPS.

When did a 60% majority become a "slim majority"?? When did it become OK to bribe people for being union members?? That's what happening right now, the union members are being bribed with being excluded from paying the same taxes the rest of us will have to pay in order to get thier support. Are you OK with that, salty??? Are you OK with there being two classes of citizens in America - those who have pay for healthcare and those who don't???
__________________
~
~
~

Our nation has not always lived up to its ideals, yet those ideals have never ceased to guide us. They expose our flaws, and lead us to mend them. We are the beneficiaries of the work of the generations before us and it is each generation's responsibility to continue that work. - Laura Bush

Giving a liberal facts is like throwing bacon at a vegetarian. All it does it piss off the vegetarian and waste good bacon.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2010, 10:27 AM
Reverend_hellh0und's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 387
Thanks: 58
Thanked 68 Times in 49 Posts
Default Re: Brown vs Coakley

The fact the dems don't have this one a lock, should tell them they are not doing right by this nation.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2010, 11:27 AM
Mikeyy's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southern California
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,461
Thanks: 1,923
Thanked 3,122 Times in 2,230 Posts
Default Re: Brown vs Coakley

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverend_hellh0und View Post
The fact the dems don't have this one a lock, should tell them they are not doing right by this nation.
If you could show me that if we didn't have the majority on the left that the right would really work on legislation in a bipartisan basis I would vote republican. Seriously. The left will lose their majority but I am not optimistic it will push them to work together. I don't really think thats possible at all anymore. We are too partisan as a nation for any politicians to risk reaching out.
I'm not saying this is the rights fault. I think its both parties at fault. And probably all our faults for not demanding more from our own leadership.
__________________
Don't take any of it too seriously.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2010, 11:29 AM
Reverend_hellh0und's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 387
Thanks: 58
Thanked 68 Times in 49 Posts
Default Re: Brown vs Coakley

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeyy View Post
If you could show me that if we didn't have the majority on the left that the right would really work on legislation in a bipartisan basis I would vote republican. Seriously. The left will lose their majority but I am not optimistic it will push them to work together. I don't really think thats possible at all anymore. We are too partisan as a nation for any politicians to risk reaching out.
I'm not saying this is the rights fault. I think its both parties at fault. And probably all our faults for not demanding more from our own leadership.




I think what or who is "right" and who is "left" in our government today is too blury for it to matter....
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2010, 11:30 AM
Mikeyy's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southern California
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,461
Thanks: 1,923
Thanked 3,122 Times in 2,230 Posts
Default Re: Brown vs Coakley

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverend_hellh0und View Post
I think what or who is "right" and who is "left" in our government today is too blury for it to matter....
two sides of the same coin. Or how about same horse different jocky.
__________________
Don't take any of it too seriously.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
brown, coakley

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Search Engine Optimization and SEO Tools
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0